Compare Samsung Galaxy S10e vs OUKITEL K9
| Name | Samsung Galaxy S10e | OUKITEL K9 |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Antutu benchmark | 390544 | 82987 |
| CPU | Samsung Exynos 9820 | MediaTek Helio P35 |
| Diagonal size | 5.8 " | 7.12 " |
| Resolution | 2280x1080 | 2244x1080 |
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 10 |
| RAM | 6 Gb | 4 Gb |
| Bezel-less | Yes | Yes |
| ROM | 128 GB | 64 GB |
| External memory | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb |
| Rear camera | 12 Mp | 16 Mp |
| Camera | Dual Camera | Dual Camera |
| Sensor model | Samsung SAK2L4 | Sony IMX298 |
| dxomark mobile ranking | ||
| dxomark (photo) | ||
| dxomark (video) | ||
| Front (selfie) camera | 10 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Battery | 3100 mAh | 6000 mAh |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Network | 4 G | 4 G |
| WiFi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS |
| Notifications Led | No | Yes |
| Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | Yes |
| Operating system (OS) | Android 10.0 (Q) | Android 9.0 |
| Material | Metal frame and glass case | Metal frame and plastic case |
| Weight | 150 g | g |
| Dimensions | 142,2 x 69,9 x 7,9 mm | mm |
| Price | 373.22€ ($399.99) See Details | 145.55€ ($155.99) See Details |
Samsung Galaxy S10e vs OUKITEL K9: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Samsung Galaxy S10e’s camera vs OUKITEL K9’s camera, see the difference between the 12Mp Samsung SAK2L4 sensor and the 16Mp Sony IMX298 sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | Samsung Galaxy S10e | OUKITEL K9 |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 12 Mp | 16 Mp |
| Sensor model | Samsung SAK2L4 | Sony IMX298 |
| Flash | Dual LED flash | Dual LED flash |
| Front (selfie) camera | 10 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Flash | No | No |
Samsung Galaxy S10e vs OUKITEL K9: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Samsung Galaxy S10e vs OUKITEL K9, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | Samsung Galaxy S10e | OUKITEL K9 |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 3100 mAh | 6000 mAh |
| Type | Non-removable | Non-removable |
| Stand-by time | 5-6 days | 6-7 days |
| Battery Life | 2-3 days | 3-4 days |
| Working hours in hard mode | 6-7 hours | 10-12 hours |
| Talk time | 30 hours | 30 hours |
| Fast charging | Yes | Yes |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
Samsung Galaxy S10e vs OUKITEL K9: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Samsung Galaxy S10e in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 390544 score points which is 370.61% faster than the OUKITEL K9, which got 82987. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Samsung Galaxy S10e vs OUKITEL K9: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Samsung Galaxy S10e in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 558 points score in "Single-core" of against the OUKITEL K9 which got 175, it is 218.86% faster. In "Multi-core" score 2468 vs 642 (284.42% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Samsung Galaxy S10e and OUKITEL K9? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Samsung Galaxy S10e (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 370.61% faster in the Antutu test (307557 score difference).
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 10Mp vs 8Mp .
- NFC supports.
- Has a higher screen resolution: 2280x1080 vs 2244x1080.
- Have water resistant supports.
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Why it is better not to take Samsung Galaxy S10e (disadvantages)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the OUKITEL K9 (advantages)
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 16Mp Sony IMX298 compared to 12Mp Samsung SAK2L4
- More battery capacity: 6000mAh vs 3100mAh (a difference of 2900mAh).
Why it is better not to take OUKITEL K9 (disadvantages)
- Does not support NFC.
- Does not have water resistant supports.
- Does not have Headphone Jack. Need audio 3.5mm headphone jack adapter
The advantages of both models
- Have fast charging supports.
Samsung Galaxy S10e related comparisons
- Compare Samsung Galaxy S10e vs Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
- Compare Samsung Galaxy S22 vs Samsung Galaxy S10e
- Compare Sharp AQUOS S2 vs Samsung Galaxy S10e
- Compare Samsung Galaxy A71 vs Samsung Galaxy S10e
- Compare Blackview BV9700 Pro vs Samsung Galaxy S10e
OUKITEL K9 related comparisons
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 vs OUKITEL K9
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 Global vs OUKITEL K9
- Compare Xiaomi Mi Max 3 vs OUKITEL K9
- Compare OUKITEL K9 vs UMIDIGI F1 Play
- Compare Blackview BV9500 Pro vs OUKITEL K9