Compare Samsung Galaxy A32 5G vs OUKITEL U23

Samsung Galaxy A32 5G vs OUKITEL U23 Comparison - Compare Size, Cameras, Specs, Features, Price of Samsung Galaxy A32 5G with OUKITEL U23.
Name	Samsung Galaxy A32 5G	OUKITEL U23

Antutu benchmark	290582	83177
CPU	MediaTek Dimensity 720	MediaTek Helio P23
Diagonal size	6.5 "	6.18 "
Resolution	1600x720	2246х1080
Multi-touch (number of touches)	10	10
RAM	4 Gb	6 Gb
Bezel-less	Yes	Yes
ROM	64 GB	64 GB
External memory	MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb	MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb
Rear camera	48 Mp	16 Mp
Camera	Four cameras	Dual Camera
Sensor model
dxomark mobile ranking
dxomark (photo)
dxomark (video)
Front (selfie) camera	13 Mp	8 Mp
Battery	5000 mAh	3500 mAh
Wireless charging	No	Yes
Network	5 G	4 G
WiFi	Yes	Yes
Bluetooth	Yes	Yes
NFC	Yes	No
Navigation (Positioning)	GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS	GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS
Notifications Led		Yes
Fingerprint's scanner	Yes	Yes
Operating system (OS)	Android 11	Android 8.1
Material	Plastic	Metal frame and glass case
Weight	205 g	201 g
Dimensions	164.2 x 76.1 x 9.1 mm	153.8 x 75.9 x 8.7 mm
Price	235.00€ ($272.37) See Details	159.11€ ($184.41) See Details

Samsung Galaxy A32 5G vs OUKITEL U23: Camera comparison.

In this table, you can compare the Samsung Galaxy A32 5G’s camera vs OUKITEL U23’s camera, see the difference between the 48Mp sensor and the 16Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.

Name	Samsung Galaxy A32 5G	OUKITEL U23
Rear camera	48 Mp	16 Mp
Sensor model
Flash	Dual LED flash	Dual LED flash
Front (selfie) camera	13 Mp	8 Mp
Flash	No	No

Samsung Galaxy A32 5G vs OUKITEL U23: battery life comparison.

Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Samsung Galaxy A32 5G vs OUKITEL U23, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.

Name	Samsung Galaxy A32 5G	OUKITEL U23
Battery	5000 mAh	3500 mAh
Type	Non-removable	Non-removable
Stand-by time	6-7 days	5-6 days
Battery Life	5-6 days	2-3 days
Working hours in hard mode	14-15 hours	6-7 hours
Talk time	30 hours	25 hours
Fast charging	Yes	Yes
Wireless charging	No	Yes

Samsung Galaxy A32 5G vs OUKITEL U23: Antutu benchmark comparison.

Samsung Galaxy A32 5G in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 290582 score points which is 249.35% faster than the OUKITEL U23, which got 83177. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.

Samsung Galaxy A32 5G

6.5 inches (1600x720) Curved Glass / Dimensity 720 / 4Gb / 64GB / 48Mp / 5000mAh

235.00€

$272.37

290582

OUKITEL U23

6.18 inches (2246х1080) Curved Glass / Helio P23 / 6Gb / 64GB / 16Mp / 3500mAh

159.11€

$184.41

83177

Samsung Galaxy A32 5G vs OUKITEL U23: Geekbench benchmark comparison.

Samsung Galaxy A32 5G in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 505 points score in "Single-core" of against the OUKITEL U23 which got 168, it is 200.60% faster. In "Multi-core" score 1659 vs 961 (72.63% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.

Samsung Galaxy A32 5G

6.5 inches (1600x720) Curved Glass / Dimensity 720 / 4Gb / 64GB / 48Mp / 5000mAh

235.00€

$272.37

505 / 1659

OUKITEL U23

6.18 inches (2246х1080) Curved Glass / Helio P23 / 6Gb / 64GB / 16Mp / 3500mAh

159.11€

$184.41

168 / 961

What is the difference between Samsung Galaxy A32 5G and OUKITEL U23? (compare specs) (which is better)

The main differences, why it is better to choose the Samsung Galaxy A32 5G (advantages)

Good performance: Is 249.35% faster in the Antutu test (207405 score difference).
Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 48Mp compared to 16Mp
Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 13Mp vs 8Mp .
NFC supports.
More battery capacity: 5000mAh vs 3500mAh (a difference of 1500mAh).
Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.

Why it is better not to take Samsung Galaxy A32 5G (disadvantages)

Does not have wireless charging support.

The main differences, why it is better to choose the OUKITEL U23 (advantages)

Best weight: 4 grams less (201 vs 205).
Has a higher screen resolution: 2246х1080 vs 1600x720.
Have wireless charging supports.

Why it is better not to take OUKITEL U23 (disadvantages)

Does not support NFC.
Does not have Headphone Jack. Need audio 3.5mm headphone jack adapter

The advantages of both models

Have fast charging supports.

Samsung Galaxy A32 5G related comparisons

OUKITEL U23 related comparisons

Rate this page: 1-5

4.50/5 of 370

Frequent comparisons