Compare OUKITEL WP300 vs OUKITEL C16 Pro
| Name | OUKITEL WP300 | OUKITEL C16 Pro |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Antutu benchmark | 516855 | 52117 |
| CPU | MediaTek Dimensity 7050 | MediaTek Helio A22 |
| Diagonal size | 6.78 " | 5.71 " |
| Resolution | 2460x1080 | 1520x720 |
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 5 |
| RAM | 12 Gb | 3 Gb |
| Bezel-less | No | No |
| ROM | 512 GB | 32 GB |
| External memory | MicroSD (TF), support of card up to 2Tb | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 128Gb |
| Rear camera | 108 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Camera | Dual Camera | Dual Camera |
| Sensor model | Samsung HM6 | |
| dxomark mobile ranking | ||
| dxomark (photo) | ||
| dxomark (video) | ||
| Front (selfie) camera | 32 Mp | 5 Mp |
| Battery | 16000 mAh | 2600 mAh |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Network | 5 G | 4 G |
| WiFi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS |
| Notifications Led | Yes | Yes |
| Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | Yes |
| Operating system (OS) | Android 15 | Android 9.0 |
| Material | Plastics and rubber | Plastic |
| Weight | 500 g | 153 g |
| Dimensions | 177.3 x 82.4 x 23.2 mm | 146,4 x 70,3 x 9,5 mm |
| Price |
Notify me when it goes on sale.
View all OUKITEL models here
Alternatives to the OUKITEL WP300: OUKITEL C19 - Compare OUKITEL WP28 - Compare OUKITEL WP5000 - Compare |
63.75€ ($73.89) See Details |
OUKITEL WP300 vs OUKITEL C16 Pro: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the OUKITEL WP300’s camera vs OUKITEL C16 Pro’s camera, see the difference between the 108Mp Samsung HM6 sensor and the 8Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | OUKITEL WP300 | OUKITEL C16 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 108 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Sensor model | Samsung HM6 | |
| Flash | Dual LED flash | Dual LED flash |
| Front (selfie) camera | 32 Mp | 5 Mp |
| Flash | No | No |
OUKITEL WP300 vs OUKITEL C16 Pro: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the OUKITEL WP300 vs OUKITEL C16 Pro, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | OUKITEL WP300 | OUKITEL C16 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 16000 mAh | 2600 mAh |
| Type | Non-removable | Removable |
| Stand-by time | 8-9 days | 5-6 days |
| Battery Life | 5-6 days | 1,5-2 days |
| Working hours in hard mode | 10-12 hours | 5-6 hours |
| Talk time | 30 hours | 25 hours |
| Fast charging | Yes | No |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
OUKITEL WP300 vs OUKITEL C16 Pro: Antutu benchmark comparison.
OUKITEL WP300 in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 516855 score points which is 891.72% faster than the OUKITEL C16 Pro, which got 52117. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
OUKITEL WP300 vs OUKITEL C16 Pro: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
OUKITEL WP300 in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 826 points score in "Single-core" of against the OUKITEL C16 Pro which got 161, it is 413.04% faster. In "Multi-core" score 2966 vs 538 (451.30% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between OUKITEL WP300 and OUKITEL C16 Pro? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the OUKITEL WP300 (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 891.72% faster in the Antutu test (464738 score difference).
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 108Mp Samsung HM6 compared to 8Mp
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 32Mp Sony IMX616 vs 5Mp .
- NFC supports.
- Has a higher screen resolution: 2460x1080 vs 1520x720.
- More battery capacity: 16000mAh vs 2600mAh (a difference of 13400mAh).
- Have water resistant supports.
- Have fast charging supports.
Why it is better not to take OUKITEL WP300 (disadvantages)
- Does not have Headphone Jack. Need audio 3.5mm headphone jack adapter
The main differences, why it is better to choose the OUKITEL C16 Pro (advantages)
- Best weight: 347 grams less (153 vs 500).
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Why it is better not to take OUKITEL C16 Pro (disadvantages)
- Does not support NFC.
- Does not have water resistant supports.
- Does not have fast charging support
The advantages of both models
OUKITEL WP300 related comparisons
- Compare OUKITEL WP300 vs OUKITEL WP7
- Compare OUKITEL WP300 vs OUKITEL C25
- Compare OUKITEL WP300 vs OUKITEL WP20 Pro
- Compare OUKITEL WP300 vs OUKITEL WP6
- Compare OUKITEL WP300 vs OUKITEL C18 Pro
OUKITEL C16 Pro related comparisons
- Compare Lenovo K5 Pro vs OUKITEL C16 Pro
- Compare OUKITEL C16 Pro vs UMIDIGI A3S
- Compare OUKITEL C12 Pro vs OUKITEL C16 Pro
- Compare Vernee M3 vs OUKITEL C16 Pro
- Compare Doogee N10 vs OUKITEL C16 Pro