Compare OUKITEL WP300 vs OUKITEL C51
| Name | OUKITEL WP300 | OUKITEL C51 |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Antutu benchmark | 516855 | 228954 |
| CPU | MediaTek Dimensity 7050 | UNISOC Tiger T606 |
| Diagonal size | 6.78 " | 6.8 " |
| Resolution | 2460x1080 | 1600x720 |
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 10 |
| RAM | 12 Gb | 6 Gb |
| Bezel-less | No | Yes |
| ROM | 512 GB | 128 GB |
| External memory | MicroSD (TF), support of card up to 2Tb | MicroSD (TF), support of card up to 2Tb |
| Rear camera | 108 Mp | 13 Mp |
| Camera | Dual Camera | Triple Camera |
| Sensor model | Samsung HM6 | |
| dxomark mobile ranking | ||
| dxomark (photo) | ||
| dxomark (video) | ||
| Front (selfie) camera | 32 Mp | 5 Mp |
| Battery | 16000 mAh | 5150 mAh |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Network | 5 G | 4 G |
| WiFi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS |
| Notifications Led | Yes | No |
| Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | Yes |
| Operating system (OS) | Android 15 | Android 13 |
| Material | Plastics and rubber | Plastic |
| Weight | 500 g | 205 g |
| Dimensions | 177.3 x 82.4 x 23.2 mm | 167.2 x 76.7 x 8.9 mm |
| Price | 236.96€ ($278.30) See Details |
Notify me when it goes on sale.
View all OUKITEL models here
Alternatives to the OUKITEL C51: OUKITEL K9 Pro - Compare OUKITEL K13 Pro - Compare OUKITEL WP23 - Compare |
OUKITEL WP300 vs OUKITEL C51: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the OUKITEL WP300’s camera vs OUKITEL C51’s camera, see the difference between the 108Mp Samsung HM6 sensor and the 13Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | OUKITEL WP300 | OUKITEL C51 |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 108 Mp | 13 Mp |
| Sensor model | Samsung HM6 | |
| Flash | Dual LED flash | LED flash |
| Front (selfie) camera | 32 Mp | 5 Mp |
| Flash | No | No |
OUKITEL WP300 vs OUKITEL C51: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the OUKITEL WP300 vs OUKITEL C51, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | OUKITEL WP300 | OUKITEL C51 |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 16000 mAh | 5150 mAh |
| Type | Non-removable | Non-removable |
| Stand-by time | 8-9 days | 6-7 days |
| Battery Life | 5-6 days | 2-3 days |
| Working hours in hard mode | 10-12 hours | 10-12 hours |
| Talk time | 30 hours | 30 hours |
| Fast charging | Yes | Yes |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
OUKITEL WP300 vs OUKITEL C51: Antutu benchmark comparison.
OUKITEL WP300 in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 516855 score points which is 125.75% faster than the OUKITEL C51, which got 228954. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
OUKITEL WP300 vs OUKITEL C51: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
OUKITEL WP300 in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 826 points score in "Single-core" of against the OUKITEL C51 which got 337, it is 145.10% faster. In "Multi-core" score 2966 vs 1287 (130.46% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between OUKITEL WP300 and OUKITEL C51? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the OUKITEL WP300 (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 125.75% faster in the Antutu test (287901 score difference).
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 108Mp Samsung HM6 compared to 13Mp
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 32Mp Sony IMX616 vs 5Mp .
- NFC supports.
- Has a higher screen resolution: 2460x1080 vs 1600x720.
- More battery capacity: 16000mAh vs 5150mAh (a difference of 10850mAh).
- Have water resistant supports.
Why it is better not to take OUKITEL WP300 (disadvantages)
- Does not have Headphone Jack. Need audio 3.5mm headphone jack adapter
The main differences, why it is better to choose the OUKITEL C51 (advantages)
- Best weight: 295 grams less (205 vs 500).
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Why it is better not to take OUKITEL C51 (disadvantages)
- Does not support NFC.
- Does not have water resistant supports.
The advantages of both models
- Have fast charging supports.
OUKITEL WP300 related comparisons
- Compare OUKITEL WP200 Pro vs OUKITEL WP300
- Compare OUKITEL WP300 vs OUKITEL WP7
- Compare OUKITEL WP30 Pro vs OUKITEL WP300
- Compare OUKITEL WP300 vs OUKITEL WP20 Pro
- Compare OUKITEL WP300 vs OUKITEL C25
OUKITEL C51 related comparisons
- Compare OUKITEL C50 vs OUKITEL C51
- Compare OUKITEL C51 vs OUKITEL C21
- Compare OUKITEL C51 vs OUKITEL C32
- Compare OUKITEL WP10 vs OUKITEL C51
- Compare OUKITEL C51 vs OUKITEL K15 Pro