Compare OUKITEL WP300 vs OUKITEL Y4800
Name | OUKITEL WP300 | OUKITEL Y4800 |
---|---|---|
![]() |
![]() |
|
Antutu benchmark | 516855 | 149833 |
CPU | MediaTek Dimensity 7050 | MediaTek Helio P70 |
Diagonal size | 6.78 " | 6.3 " |
Resolution | 2460x1080 | 2340x1080 |
Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 10 |
RAM | 12 Gb | 6 Gb |
Bezel-less | No | Yes |
ROM | 512 GB | 128 GB |
External memory | MicroSD (TF), support of card up to 2Tb | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb |
Rear camera | 108 Mp | 48 Mp |
Camera | Dual Camera | Dual Camera |
Sensor model | Samsung HM6 | Sony IMX582 |
dxomark mobile ranking | ||
dxomark (photo) | ||
dxomark (video) | ||
Front (selfie) camera | 32 Mp | 16 Mp |
Battery | 16000 mAh | 4000 mAh |
Wireless charging | No | No |
Network | 5 G | 4 G |
WiFi | Yes | Yes |
Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
NFC | Yes | No |
Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS |
Notifications Led | Yes | Yes |
Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | Yes |
Operating system (OS) | Android 15 | Android 9.0 |
Material | Plastics and rubber | Metal frame and plastic case |
Weight | 500 g | 170 g |
Dimensions | 177.3 x 82.4 x 23.2 mm | 157 x 74.8 x 8.25 mm |
Price |
Notify me when it goes on sale.
View all OUKITEL models here
Alternatives to the OUKITEL WP300: OUKITEL C31 3/16GB - Compare OUKITEL WP200 Pro - Compare OUKITEL K16 - Compare |
189.21€ ($211.20) See Details |
OUKITEL WP300 vs OUKITEL Y4800: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the OUKITEL WP300’s camera vs OUKITEL Y4800’s camera, see the difference between the 108Mp Samsung HM6 sensor and the 48Mp Sony IMX582 sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
Name | OUKITEL WP300 | OUKITEL Y4800 |
---|---|---|
Rear camera | 108 Mp | 48 Mp |
Sensor model | Samsung HM6 | Sony IMX582 |
Flash | Dual LED flash | Dual LED flash |
Front (selfie) camera | 32 Mp | 16 Mp |
Flash | No | No |
OUKITEL WP300 vs OUKITEL Y4800: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the OUKITEL WP300 vs OUKITEL Y4800, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
Name | OUKITEL WP300 | OUKITEL Y4800 |
---|---|---|
Battery | 16000 mAh | 4000 mAh |
Type | Non-removable | Non-removable |
Stand-by time | 8-9 days | 6-7 days |
Battery Life | 5-6 days | 3-4 days |
Working hours in hard mode | 10-12 hours | 8-9 hours |
Talk time | 30 hours | 30 hours |
Fast charging | Yes | Yes |
Wireless charging | No | No |
OUKITEL WP300 vs OUKITEL Y4800: Antutu benchmark comparison.
OUKITEL WP300 in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 516855 score points which is 244.95% faster than the OUKITEL Y4800, which got 149833. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
OUKITEL WP300 vs OUKITEL Y4800: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
OUKITEL WP300 in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 826 points score in "Single-core" of against the OUKITEL Y4800 which got 310, it is 166.45% faster. In "Multi-core" score 2966 vs 1399 (112.01% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between OUKITEL WP300 and OUKITEL Y4800? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the OUKITEL WP300 (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 244.95% faster in the Antutu test (367022 score difference).
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 108Mp Samsung HM6 compared to 48Mp Sony IMX582
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 32Mp Sony IMX616 vs 16Mp .
- NFC supports.
- Has a higher screen resolution: 2460x1080 vs 2340x1080.
- More battery capacity: 16000mAh vs 4000mAh (a difference of 12000mAh).
- Have water resistant supports.
Why it is better not to take OUKITEL WP300 (disadvantages)
- Does not have infrared blaster supports.
- Does not have Headphone Jack. Need audio 3.5mm headphone jack adapter
The main differences, why it is better to choose the OUKITEL Y4800 (advantages)
- Best weight: 330 grams less (170 vs 500).
- Have infrared blaster supports.
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Why it is better not to take OUKITEL Y4800 (disadvantages)
- Does not support NFC.
- Does not have water resistant supports.
The advantages of both models
- Have fast charging supports.
OUKITEL WP300 related comparisons
- Compare OUKITEL WP300 vs OUKITEL WP20 Pro
- Compare OUKITEL WP300 vs OUKITEL C25
- Compare OUKITEL WP300 vs OUKITEL C18 Pro
- Compare OUKITEL WP300 vs OUKITEL WP7
- Compare OUKITEL WP300 vs OUKITEL WP6
OUKITEL Y4800 related comparisons
- Compare Elephone Soldier vs OUKITEL Y4800
- Compare OUKITEL Y4800 vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Global
- Compare Ulefone Armor 6E vs OUKITEL Y4800
- Compare OUKITEL U23 vs OUKITEL Y4800
- Compare OUKITEL Y4800 vs Doogee N20