Compare OUKITEL WP300 vs Samsung Galaxy A17 5G
Name | OUKITEL WP300 | Samsung Galaxy A17 5G |
---|---|---|
![]() |
![]() |
|
Antutu benchmark | 516855 | 413273 |
CPU | MediaTek Dimensity 7050 | Samsung Exynos 1330 |
Diagonal size | 6.78 " | 6.7 " |
Resolution | 2460x1080 | 2340x1080 |
Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 10 |
RAM | 12 Gb | 4 Gb |
Bezel-less | No | Yes |
ROM | 512 GB | 128 GB |
External memory | MicroSD (TF), support of card up to 2Tb | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb |
Rear camera | 108 Mp | 50 Mp |
Camera | Dual Camera | Triple Camera |
Sensor model | Samsung HM6 | |
dxomark mobile ranking | ||
dxomark (photo) | ||
dxomark (video) | ||
Front (selfie) camera | 32 Mp | 13 Mp |
Battery | 16000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
Wireless charging | No | No |
Network | 5 G | 5 G |
WiFi | Yes | Yes |
Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
NFC | Yes | Yes |
Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS |
Notifications Led | Yes | No |
Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | Yes |
Operating system (OS) | Android 15 | Android 15 |
Material | Plastics and rubber | Plastic |
Weight | 500 g | 192 g |
Dimensions | 177.3 x 82.4 x 23.2 mm | 164.4 x 77.9 x 7.5 mm |
Price | 237.83€ ($278.31) See Details |
Notify me when it goes on sale.
View all Samsung models here
Alternatives to the Samsung Galaxy A17 5G: Samsung Galaxy M12 3/32GB - Compare Samsung Galaxy A51 4/64Gb - Compare Samsung Galaxy A34 5G 6/256GB - Compare |
OUKITEL WP300 vs Samsung Galaxy A17 5G: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the OUKITEL WP300’s camera vs Samsung Galaxy A17 5G’s camera, see the difference between the 108Mp Samsung HM6 sensor and the 50Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
Name | OUKITEL WP300 | Samsung Galaxy A17 5G |
---|---|---|
Rear camera | 108 Mp | 50 Mp |
Sensor model | Samsung HM6 | |
Flash | Dual LED flash | LED flash |
Front (selfie) camera | 32 Mp | 13 Mp |
Flash | No | No |
OUKITEL WP300 vs Samsung Galaxy A17 5G: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the OUKITEL WP300 vs Samsung Galaxy A17 5G, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
Name | OUKITEL WP300 | Samsung Galaxy A17 5G |
---|---|---|
Battery | 16000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
Type | Non-removable | Non-removable |
Stand-by time | 8-9 days | 6-7 days |
Battery Life | 5-6 days | 3-4 days |
Working hours in hard mode | 10-12 hours | 8-9 hours |
Talk time | 30 hours | 30 hours |
Fast charging | Yes | Yes |
Wireless charging | No | No |
OUKITEL WP300 vs Samsung Galaxy A17 5G: Antutu benchmark comparison.
OUKITEL WP300 in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 516855 score points which is 25.06% faster than the Samsung Galaxy A17 5G, which got 413273. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
OUKITEL WP300 vs Samsung Galaxy A17 5G: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
OUKITEL WP300 in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 826 points score in "Single-core" of against the Samsung Galaxy A17 5G which got 764, it is 8.12% faster. In "Multi-core" score 2966 vs 2327 (27.46% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between OUKITEL WP300 and Samsung Galaxy A17 5G? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the OUKITEL WP300 (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 25.06% faster in the Antutu test (103582 score difference).
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 108Mp Samsung HM6 compared to 50Mp
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 32Mp Sony IMX616 vs 13Mp .
- Has a higher screen resolution: 2460x1080 vs 2340x1080.
- More battery capacity: 16000mAh vs 5000mAh (a difference of 11000mAh).
- Have water resistant supports.
Why it is better not to take OUKITEL WP300 (disadvantages)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Samsung Galaxy A17 5G (advantages)
- Best weight: 308 grams less (192 vs 500).
Why it is better not to take Samsung Galaxy A17 5G (disadvantages)
- Does not have water resistant supports.
The advantages of both models
- NFC supports.
- Have fast charging supports.
OUKITEL WP300 related comparisons
- Compare OUKITEL WP200 Pro vs OUKITEL WP300
- Compare OUKITEL WP300 vs OUKITEL WP7
- Compare OUKITEL WP30 Pro vs OUKITEL WP300
- Compare OUKITEL WP300 vs OUKITEL WP20 Pro
- Compare OUKITEL WP300 vs OUKITEL C25
Samsung Galaxy A17 5G related comparisons
- Compare Samsung Galaxy A34 5G vs Samsung Galaxy A17 5G
- Compare Samsung Galaxy A54 5G vs Samsung Galaxy A17 5G
- Compare Samsung Galaxy M54 5G vs Samsung Galaxy A17 5G
- Compare Samsung Galaxy A16 5G vs Samsung Galaxy A17 5G
- Compare Samsung Galaxy A17 5G vs Samsung Galaxy S10