Compare OUKITEL WP35S vs OUKITEL C32
| Name | OUKITEL WP35S | OUKITEL C32 |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Antutu benchmark | 239884 | 165488 |
| CPU | MediaTek Helio G85 | UNISOC Tiger T606 |
| Diagonal size | 6.56 " | 6.51 " |
| Resolution | 1612х720 | 1600x720 |
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 10 |
| RAM | 6 Gb | 8 Gb |
| Bezel-less | No | Yes |
| ROM | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| External memory | MicroSD (TF), support of card up to 2Tb | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb |
| Rear camera | 48 Mp | 20 Mp |
| Camera | Triple Camera | Triple Camera |
| Sensor model | Omnivision OV48B | Sony IMX376 |
| dxomark mobile ranking | ||
| dxomark (photo) | ||
| dxomark (video) | ||
| Front (selfie) camera | 16 Mp | 5 Mp |
| Battery | 11000 mAh | 5150 mAh |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Network | 4 G | 4 G |
| WiFi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS |
| Notifications Led | No | No |
| Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | Yes |
| Operating system (OS) | Android 14 | Android 12 |
| Material | Plastics and rubber | Plastic |
| Weight | 360 g | 198 g |
| Dimensions | 172.2 x 81 x 14.9 mm | 164 x 76 x 9.2 mm |
| Price |
Notify me when it goes on sale.
View all OUKITEL models here
Alternatives to the OUKITEL WP35S: OUKITEL K9 Pro - Compare OUKITEL C25 - Compare OUKITEL WP5 4/32Gb - Compare |
86.58€ ($99.99) See Details |
OUKITEL WP35S vs OUKITEL C32: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the OUKITEL WP35S’s camera vs OUKITEL C32’s camera, see the difference between the 48Mp Omnivision OV48B sensor and the 20Mp Sony IMX376 sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | OUKITEL WP35S | OUKITEL C32 |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 48 Mp | 20 Mp |
| Sensor model | Omnivision OV48B | Sony IMX376 |
| Flash | Dual LED flash | LED flash |
| Front (selfie) camera | 16 Mp | 5 Mp |
| Flash | No | No |
OUKITEL WP35S vs OUKITEL C32: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the OUKITEL WP35S vs OUKITEL C32, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | OUKITEL WP35S | OUKITEL C32 |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 11000 mAh | 5150 mAh |
| Type | Non-removable | Non-removable |
| Stand-by time | 6-7 days | 6-7 days |
| Battery Life | 3-4 days | 2-3 days |
| Working hours in hard mode | 10-12 hours | 8-9 hours |
| Talk time | 30 hours | 30 hours |
| Fast charging | Yes | No |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
OUKITEL WP35S vs OUKITEL C32: Antutu benchmark comparison.
OUKITEL WP35S in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 239884 score points which is 44.96% faster than the OUKITEL C32, which got 165488. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
OUKITEL WP35S vs OUKITEL C32: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
OUKITEL WP35S in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 391 points score in "Single-core" of against the OUKITEL C32 which got 315, it is 24.13% faster. In "Multi-core" score 1368 vs 1183 (15.64% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between OUKITEL WP35S and OUKITEL C32? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the OUKITEL WP35S (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 44.96% faster in the Antutu test (74396 score difference).
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 48Mp Omnivision OV48B compared to 20Mp Sony IMX376
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 16Mp vs 5Mp .
- NFC supports.
- Has a higher screen resolution: 1612х720 vs 1600x720.
- More battery capacity: 11000mAh vs 5150mAh (a difference of 5850mAh).
- Have water resistant supports.
- Have fast charging supports.
Why it is better not to take OUKITEL WP35S (disadvantages)
- Does not have Headphone Jack. Need audio 3.5mm headphone jack adapter
The main differences, why it is better to choose the OUKITEL C32 (advantages)
- Best weight: 162 grams less (198 vs 360).
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Why it is better not to take OUKITEL C32 (disadvantages)
- Does not support NFC.
- Does not have water resistant supports.
- Does not have fast charging support
The advantages of both models
OUKITEL WP35S related comparisons
- Compare OUKITEL WP35 vs OUKITEL WP35S
- Compare OUKITEL WP35S vs OUKITEL K13 Pro
- Compare OUKITEL WP35S vs OUKITEL K3 Pro
- Compare OUKITEL WP33 Pro vs OUKITEL WP35S
- Compare OUKITEL WP35S vs OUKITEL C21 Pro
OUKITEL C32 related comparisons
- Compare OUKITEL C31 Pro vs OUKITEL C32
- Compare OUKITEL C33 vs OUKITEL C32
- Compare OUKITEL C32 vs Blackview Oscal C80
- Compare OUKITEL C36 vs OUKITEL C32
- Compare OUKITEL C32 vs Cubot P60