Compare OUKITEL WP35 vs Cubot KingKong Ace 3
| Name | OUKITEL WP35 | Cubot KingKong Ace 3 |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Antutu benchmark | 380911 | 229844 |
| CPU | MediaTek Dimensity 6100+ | MediaTek Helio G88 |
| Diagonal size | 6.6 " | 6.58 " |
| Resolution | 2408x1080 | 2408x1080 |
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 10 |
| RAM | 8 Gb | 8 Gb |
| Bezel-less | No | No |
| ROM | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| External memory | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb | MicroSD (TF), support of card up to 2Tb |
| Rear camera | 64 Mp | 100 Mp |
| Camera | Triple Camera | Triple Camera |
| Sensor model | Sony IMX686 | |
| dxomark mobile ranking | ||
| dxomark (photo) | ||
| dxomark (video) | ||
| Front (selfie) camera | 16 Mp | 32 Mp |
| Battery | 11000 mAh | 5100 mAh |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Network | 5 G | 4 G |
| WiFi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS |
| Notifications Led | No | No |
| Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | Yes |
| Operating system (OS) | Android 14 | Android 14 |
| Material | Plastics and rubber | Plastics and rubber |
| Weight | 360 g | 284 g |
| Dimensions | 172.2 x 81 x 15.3 mm | 173.9 x 81.8 x 12.7 mm |
| Price |
Notify me when it goes on sale.
View all OUKITEL models here
Alternatives to the OUKITEL WP35: OUKITEL WP30 Pro - Compare OUKITEL K9 Pro - Compare OUKITEL Y1000 - Compare |
Notify me when it goes on sale.
View all Cubot models here
Alternatives to the Cubot KingKong Ace 3: Cubot X9 - Compare Cubot King Kong 5 Pro - Compare Cubot King Kong Star - Compare |
OUKITEL WP35 vs Cubot KingKong Ace 3: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the OUKITEL WP35’s camera vs Cubot KingKong Ace 3’s camera, see the difference between the 64Mp Sony IMX686 sensor and the 100Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | OUKITEL WP35 | Cubot KingKong Ace 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 64 Mp | 100 Mp |
| Sensor model | Sony IMX686 | |
| Flash | Dual LED flash | LED flash |
| Front (selfie) camera | 16 Mp | 32 Mp |
| Flash | No | No |
OUKITEL WP35 vs Cubot KingKong Ace 3: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the OUKITEL WP35 vs Cubot KingKong Ace 3, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | OUKITEL WP35 | Cubot KingKong Ace 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 11000 mAh | 5100 mAh |
| Type | Non-removable | Non-removable |
| Stand-by time | 6-7 days | 6-7 days |
| Battery Life | 3-4 days | 2-3 days |
| Working hours in hard mode | 10-12 hours | 8-9 hours |
| Talk time | 30 hours | 30 hours |
| Fast charging | Yes | Yes |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
OUKITEL WP35 vs Cubot KingKong Ace 3: Antutu benchmark comparison.
OUKITEL WP35 in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 380911 score points which is 65.73% faster than the Cubot KingKong Ace 3, which got 229844. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
OUKITEL WP35 vs Cubot KingKong Ace 3: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
OUKITEL WP35 in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 644 points score in "Single-core" of against the Cubot KingKong Ace 3 which got 398, it is 61.81% faster. In "Multi-core" score 1938 vs 1411 (37.35% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between OUKITEL WP35 and Cubot KingKong Ace 3? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the OUKITEL WP35 (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 65.73% faster in the Antutu test (151067 score difference).
- More battery capacity: 11000mAh vs 5100mAh (a difference of 5900mAh).
Why it is better not to take OUKITEL WP35 (disadvantages)
- Does not have Headphone Jack. Need audio 3.5mm headphone jack adapter
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Cubot KingKong Ace 3 (advantages)
- Best weight: 76 grams less (284 vs 360).
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 100Mp compared to 64Mp Sony IMX686
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 32Mp vs 16Mp .
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Why it is better not to take Cubot KingKong Ace 3 (disadvantages)
The advantages of both models
- NFC supports.
- Have water resistant supports.
- Have fast charging supports.
OUKITEL WP35 related comparisons
- Compare OUKITEL WP35 vs OUKITEL WP39
- Compare OUKITEL WP35 vs OUKITEL WP35S
- Compare OUKITEL WP35 vs OUKITEL WP33 Pro
- Compare OUKITEL WP35 vs OUKITEL WP21
- Compare OUKITEL WP35 vs OUKITEL C35
Cubot KingKong Ace 3 related comparisons
- Compare Cubot KingKong Ace 3 vs Cubot KingKong Power
- Compare Cubot KingKong AX vs Cubot KingKong Ace 3
- Compare Cubot KingKong Ace 3 vs Cubot S200
- Compare Cubot KingKong X vs Cubot KingKong Ace 3
- Compare Cubot X90 vs Cubot KingKong Ace 3