Compare OUKITEL WP39 Pro vs OUKITEL C35
| Name | OUKITEL WP39 Pro | OUKITEL C35 |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Antutu benchmark | 378795 | 231352 |
| CPU | MediaTek Dimensity 6300 | UNISOC Tiger T616 |
| Diagonal size | 6.6 " | 6.56 " |
| Resolution | 2400x1080 | 1600x720 |
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 10 |
| RAM | 12 Gb | 12 Gb |
| Bezel-less | No | Yes |
| ROM | 512 GB | 256 GB |
| External memory | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb | MicroSD (TF), support of card up to 2Tb |
| Rear camera | 64 Mp | 50 Mp |
| Camera | Triple Camera | Dual Camera |
| Sensor model | Sony IMX682 | Samsung S5KJN1 |
| dxomark mobile ranking | ||
| dxomark (photo) | ||
| dxomark (video) | ||
| Front (selfie) camera | 32 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Battery | 11000 mAh | 5150 mAh |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Network | 5 G | 4 G |
| WiFi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS |
| Notifications Led | No | No |
| Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | Yes |
| Operating system (OS) | Android 14 | Android 13 |
| Material | Plastics and rubber | Plastic |
| Weight | 368 g | 199 g |
| Dimensions | 172.2 x 81 x 14.9 mm | 163.75 x 75.4 x 9.18 mm |
| Price |
Notify me when it goes on sale.
View all OUKITEL models here
Alternatives to the OUKITEL WP39 Pro: OUKITEL C32 - Compare OUKITEL C31 3/16GB - Compare OUKITEL WP12 - Compare |
128.74€ ($149.21) See Details |
OUKITEL WP39 Pro vs OUKITEL C35: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the OUKITEL WP39 Pro’s camera vs OUKITEL C35’s camera, see the difference between the 64Mp Sony IMX682 sensor and the 50Mp Samsung S5KJN1 sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | OUKITEL WP39 Pro | OUKITEL C35 |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 64 Mp | 50 Mp |
| Sensor model | Sony IMX682 | Samsung S5KJN1 |
| Flash | LED flash | LED flash |
| Front (selfie) camera | 32 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Flash | No | No |
OUKITEL WP39 Pro vs OUKITEL C35: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the OUKITEL WP39 Pro vs OUKITEL C35, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | OUKITEL WP39 Pro | OUKITEL C35 |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 11000 mAh | 5150 mAh |
| Type | Non-removable | Non-removable |
| Stand-by time | 8-9 days | 6-7 days |
| Battery Life | 3-4 days | 2-3 days |
| Working hours in hard mode | 14-15 hours | 10-12 hours |
| Talk time | 30 hours | 30 hours |
| Fast charging | Yes | Yes |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
OUKITEL WP39 Pro vs OUKITEL C35: Antutu benchmark comparison.
OUKITEL WP39 Pro in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 378795 score points which is 63.73% faster than the OUKITEL C35, which got 231352. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
OUKITEL WP39 Pro vs OUKITEL C35: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
OUKITEL WP39 Pro in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 644 points score in "Single-core" of against the OUKITEL C35 which got 377, it is 70.82% faster. In "Multi-core" score 1973 vs 1368 (44.23% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between OUKITEL WP39 Pro and OUKITEL C35? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the OUKITEL WP39 Pro (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 63.73% faster in the Antutu test (147443 score difference).
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 64Mp Sony IMX682 compared to 50Mp Samsung S5KJN1
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 32Mp Sony IMX616 vs 8Mp .
- Has a higher screen resolution: 2400x1080 vs 1600x720.
- More battery capacity: 11000mAh vs 5150mAh (a difference of 5850mAh).
- Have water resistant supports.
Why it is better not to take OUKITEL WP39 Pro (disadvantages)
- Does not have Headphone Jack. Need audio 3.5mm headphone jack adapter
The main differences, why it is better to choose the OUKITEL C35 (advantages)
- Best weight: 169 grams less (199 vs 368).
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Why it is better not to take OUKITEL C35 (disadvantages)
- Does not have water resistant supports.
The advantages of both models
- NFC supports.
- Have fast charging supports.
OUKITEL WP39 Pro related comparisons
- Compare OUKITEL WP200 Pro vs OUKITEL WP39 Pro
- Compare OUKITEL WP39 Pro vs OUKITEL C31 Pro
- Compare OUKITEL WP39 Pro vs OUKITEL C18 Pro
- Compare OUKITEL WP39 Pro vs OUKITEL K3 Pro
- Compare OUKITEL WP39 Pro vs OUKITEL WP26
OUKITEL C35 related comparisons
- Compare OUKITEL C35 vs OUKITEL C36
- Compare OUKITEL C35 vs OUKITEL C33
- Compare UMIDIGI A15 vs OUKITEL C35
- Compare Samsung Galaxy A55 5G vs OUKITEL C35
- Compare OUKITEL C35 vs OUKITEL C32