Compare Oppo Find X3 8/128GB vs OUKITEL Y4800
| Name | Oppo Find X3 8/128GB | OUKITEL Y4800 |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Antutu benchmark | 658770 | 149833 |
| CPU | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 | MediaTek Helio P70 |
| Diagonal size | 6.7 " | 6.3 " |
| Resolution | 3216x1440 | 2340x1080 |
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 10 |
| RAM | 8 Gb | 6 Gb |
| Bezel-less | Yes | Yes |
| ROM | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| External memory | No | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb |
| Rear camera | 50 Mp | 48 Mp |
| Camera | Four cameras | Dual Camera |
| Sensor model | Sony IMX766 | Sony IMX582 |
| dxomark mobile ranking | ||
| dxomark (photo) | ||
| dxomark (video) | ||
| Front (selfie) camera | 32 Mp | 16 Mp |
| Battery | 4500 mAh | 4000 mAh |
| Wireless charging | Yes | No |
| Network | 5 G | 4 G |
| WiFi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS |
| Notifications Led | No | Yes |
| Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | Yes |
| Operating system (OS) | Android 11 | Android 9.0 |
| Material | Metal frame and glass case | Metal frame and plastic case |
| Weight | 193 g | 170 g |
| Dimensions | 163.6 x 74 x 8.3 mm | 157 x 74.8 x 8.25 mm |
| Price | 532.48€ ($614.99) See Details | 182.86€ ($211.20) See Details |
Oppo Find X3 8/128GB vs OUKITEL Y4800: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Oppo Find X3’s camera vs OUKITEL Y4800’s camera, see the difference between the 50Mp Sony IMX766 sensor and the 48Mp Sony IMX582 sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | Oppo Find X3 8/128GB | OUKITEL Y4800 |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 50 Mp | 48 Mp |
| Sensor model | Sony IMX766 | Sony IMX582 |
| Flash | Dual LED flash | Dual LED flash |
| Front (selfie) camera | 32 Mp | 16 Mp |
| Flash | No | No |
Oppo Find X3 8/128GB vs OUKITEL Y4800: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Oppo Find X3 vs OUKITEL Y4800, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | Oppo Find X3 8/128GB | OUKITEL Y4800 |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 4500 mAh | 4000 mAh |
| Type | Non-removable | Non-removable |
| Stand-by time | 6-7 days | 6-7 days |
| Battery Life | 3-4 days | 3-4 days |
| Working hours in hard mode | 10-12 hours | 8-9 hours |
| Talk time | 30 hours | 30 hours |
| Fast charging | Yes | Yes |
| Wireless charging | Yes | No |
Oppo Find X3 8/128GB vs OUKITEL Y4800: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Oppo Find X3 8/128GB in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 658770 score points which is 339.67% faster than the OUKITEL Y4800, which got 149833. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Oppo Find X3 8/128GB vs OUKITEL Y4800: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Oppo Find X3 8/128GB in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 933 points score in "Single-core" of against the OUKITEL Y4800 which got 310, it is 200.97% faster. In "Multi-core" score 3278 vs 1399 (134.31% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Oppo Find X3 8/128GB and OUKITEL Y4800? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Oppo Find X3 8/128GB (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 339.67% faster in the Antutu test (508937 score difference).
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 50Mp Sony IMX766 compared to 48Mp Sony IMX582
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 32Mp Sony IMX616 vs 16Mp .
- NFC supports.
- Has a higher screen resolution: 3216x1440 vs 2340x1080.
- More battery capacity: 4500mAh vs 4000mAh (a difference of 500mAh).
- Have water resistant supports.
- Have wireless charging supports.
Why it is better not to take Oppo Find X3 8/128GB (disadvantages)
- Does not have infrared blaster supports.
- Does not have Headphone Jack. Need audio 3.5mm headphone jack adapter
The main differences, why it is better to choose the OUKITEL Y4800 (advantages)
- Best weight: 23 grams less (170 vs 193).
- Have infrared blaster supports.
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Why it is better not to take OUKITEL Y4800 (disadvantages)
- Does not support NFC.
- Does not have water resistant supports.
- Does not have wireless charging support.
The advantages of both models
- Have fast charging supports.
Oppo Find X3 8/128GB related comparisons
- Compare Oppo Find X3 vs Oppo Find X3 Pro
- Compare OnePlus 8 vs Oppo Find X3
- Compare Oppo Find X3 vs Oppo Reno 4 5G
- Compare Oppo Reno Ace 2 vs Oppo Find X3
- Compare Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro vs Oppo Find X3
OUKITEL Y4800 related comparisons
- Compare Elephone Soldier vs OUKITEL Y4800
- Compare OUKITEL Y4800 vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Global
- Compare Ulefone Armor 6E vs OUKITEL Y4800
- Compare OUKITEL U23 vs OUKITEL Y4800
- Compare OUKITEL Y4800 vs Doogee N20