0
Compare:
Compare with:
Please enter model name or part of it
 
AED درهم BHD دب BRL R$ CNY ¥ CZK Kč DKK kr EUR € GBP £ IDR Rp ILS ₪ INR ₹ JPY ¥ KRW ₩ KWD د.ك NOK kr PLN zł QAR ريال RUB руб SAR SAR SEK kr TRY ₺ UAH грн
You were probably searching for:
Reviews

Compare Oppo A11K vs Xiaomi Redmi 3SS

Oppo A11K vs Xiaomi Redmi 3SS Comparison - Compare Size, Cameras, Specs, Features, Price of Oppo A11K with Xiaomi Redmi 3SS.

Name Oppo A11K Xiaomi Redmi 3SS
Oppo A11K Xiaomi Redmi 3SS
Antutu benchmark 102077
CPU MediaTek Helio P35 Qualcomm Snapdragon 616
Diagonal size 6.2 " 5 "
Resolution 1520x720 1280x720
Multi-touch (number of touches) 10 5
RAM 2 Gb 2 Gb
Bezel-less No No
ROM 32 GB 16 GB
External memory MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb
Rear camera 13 Mp 13 Mp
Camera Dual Camera Single camera
Sensor model
dxomark mobile ranking
dxomark (photo)
dxomark (video)
Front (selfie) camera 5 Mp 5 Mp
Battery 4230 mAh 4000 mAh
Wireless charging No
Network 4 G G
WiFi Yes Yes
Bluetooth Yes
NFC No
Navigation (Positioning) GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS
Notifications Led No
Fingerprint's scanner No
Operating system (OS) Android 9.0
Material Plastic
Weight 165 g 143 g
Dimensions 156 x 76 x 8 mm 139,3 x 69,6 x 8,5 mm
  Price Discontinued. View all Oppo models here
Alternatives to the Oppo A11K:
Oppo A15 - Compare
Oppo A31 - Compare
Oppo A52 - Compare
Notify me when it goes on sale. View all Xiaomi models here
Alternatives to the Xiaomi Redmi 3SS:
Xiaomi 13 Pro 8/128GB - Compare
Xiaomi Poco F5 8/256GB - Compare
Xiaomi 12 Lite 6/128GB - Compare

Oppo A11K vs Xiaomi Redmi 3SS: Camera comparison.

In this table, you can compare the Oppo A11K’s camera vs Xiaomi Redmi 3SS’s camera, see the difference between the 13Mp sensor and the 13Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.

Name Oppo A11K Xiaomi Redmi 3SS
Rear camera 13 Mp 13 Mp
Sensor model
Flash LED flash
Front (selfie) camera 5 Mp 5 Mp
Flash No

Oppo A11K vs Xiaomi Redmi 3SS: battery life comparison.

Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Oppo A11K vs Xiaomi Redmi 3SS, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.

Name Oppo A11K Xiaomi Redmi 3SS
Battery 4230 mAh 4000 mAh
Type Non-removable Removable
Stand-by time 6-7 days
Battery Life 3-4 days
Working hours in hard mode 10-12 hours
Talk time 30 hours
Fast charging No
Wireless charging No

Oppo A11K vs Xiaomi Redmi 3SS: Antutu benchmark comparison. Oppo A11K vs Xiaomi Redmi 3SS: Antutu benchmark comparison.

Oppo A11K in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 102077 score points which is 100.00% faster than the Xiaomi Redmi 3SS, which got 0. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.

0.00€
$0.00
 
Xiaomi Redmi 3SS
5" (1280x720) / Snapdragon 616 / 2Gb / 16GB / 13Mp / 4000mAh
On Sale Soon
On Sale Soon
 

Oppo A11K vs Xiaomi Redmi 3SS: Geekbench benchmark comparison.

Oppo A11K in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 176 points score in "Single-core" of against the Xiaomi Redmi 3SS which got 114, it is 54.39% faster. In "Multi-core" score 1004 vs 532 (88.72% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.

0.00€
$0.00
 
Xiaomi Redmi 3SS
5" (1280x720) / Snapdragon 616 / 2Gb / 16GB / 13Mp / 4000mAh
On Sale Soon
On Sale Soon
 

What is the difference between Oppo A11K and Xiaomi Redmi 3SS? (compare specs) (which is better)

The main differences, why it is better to choose the Oppo A11K (advantages)

  • Has a higher screen resolution: 1520x720 vs 1280x720.
  • More battery capacity: 4230mAh vs 4000mAh (a difference of 230mAh).

Why it is better not to take Oppo A11K (disadvantages)

The main differences, why it is better to choose the Xiaomi Redmi 3SS (advantages)

  • Best weight: 22 grams less (143 vs 165).

Why it is better not to take Xiaomi Redmi 3SS (disadvantages)

The advantages of both models

  • Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.

Oppo A11K related comparisons

Xiaomi Redmi 3SS related comparisons

Rate this page: 1-5
4.50/5 of 2
Frequent comparisons