0
Compare:
Compare with:
Please enter model name or part of it
 
AED درهم BHD دب BRL R$ CNY ¥ CZK Kč DKK kr EUR € GBP £ IDR Rp ILS ₪ INR ₹ JPY ¥ KRW ₩ KWD د.ك NOK kr PLN zł QAR ريال RUB руб SAR درهم SEK kr TRY ₺ UAH грн
You were probably searching for:
Reviews

Compare Oppo Find X2 vs Doogee DG500C (Discovery)

Oppo Find X2 vs Doogee DG500C (Discovery) Comparison - Compare Size, Cameras, Specs, Features, Price of Oppo Find X2 with Doogee DG500C (Discovery).

Name Oppo Find X2 Doogee DG500C (Discovery)
Oppo Find X2 Doogee DG500C (Discovery)
Antutu benchmark 505499
CPU Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
Diagonal size 6.7 " "
Resolution 3168x1440
Multi-touch (number of touches) 10
RAM 12 Gb Gb
Bezel-less Yes
ROM 256 GB GB
External memory No
Rear camera 48 Mp Mp
Camera Triple Camera Single camera
Sensor model Sony IMX586
dxomark mobile ranking
dxomark (photo)
dxomark (video)
Front (selfie) camera 32 Mp Mp
Battery 4200 mAh mAh
Wireless charging No
Network 5 G G
Sim cards
WiFi Yes
Bluetooth Yes
NFC Yes
Navigation (Positioning) GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS
Notifications Led Yes
Fingerprint's scanner No
Operating system (OS) Android 10.0 (Q)
Material Metal frame and glass case
Weight 180 g g
Dimensions 164.9 x 74.5 x 8.7 mm mm
  Price 899.00€ ($963.49) See Details Discontinued. View all Doogee models here
Alternatives to the Doogee DG500C (Discovery):
Doogee S96 Pro - Compare
Doogee V11 - Compare
Doogee S40 3/32Gb - Compare

Oppo Find X2 vs Doogee DG500C (Discovery): Camera comparison.

In this table, you can compare the Oppo Find X2’s camera vs Doogee DG500C (Discovery)’s camera, see the difference between the 48Mp Sony IMX586 sensor and the Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.

Name Oppo Find X2 Doogee DG500C (Discovery)
Rear camera 48 Mp Mp
Sensor model Sony IMX586
Flash Dual LED flash
Front (selfie) camera 32 Mp Mp
Flash No

Oppo Find X2 vs Doogee DG500C (Discovery): battery life comparison.

Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Oppo Find X2 vs Doogee DG500C (Discovery), compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.

Name Oppo Find X2 Doogee DG500C (Discovery)
Battery 4200 mAh mAh
Type Non-removable
Stand-by time 6-7 days
Battery Life 3-4 days
Working hours in hard mode 10-12 hours
Talk time 30 hours
Fast charging Yes
Wireless charging No

Oppo Find X2 vs Doogee DG500C (Discovery): Antutu benchmark comparison. Oppo Find X2 vs Doogee DG500C (Discovery): Antutu benchmark comparison.

Oppo Find X2 in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 505499 score points which is 100.00% faster than the Doogee DG500C (Discovery), which got 0. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.

Oppo Find X2
6.7" (3168x1440) Gorilla glass / Snapdragon 865 / 12Gb / 256GB / 48Mp Sony IMX586 / 4200mAh
899.00€
$963.49
 
109.25€
$117.09
 

Oppo Find X2 vs Doogee DG500C (Discovery): Geekbench benchmark comparison.

Oppo Find X2 in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 913 points score in "Single-core" of against the Doogee DG500C (Discovery) which got 0, it is 100.00% faster. In "Multi-core" score 3308 vs 0 (100.00% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.

Oppo Find X2
6.7" (3168x1440) Gorilla glass / Snapdragon 865 / 12Gb / 256GB / 48Mp Sony IMX586 / 4200mAh
899.00€
$963.49
 

What is the difference between Oppo Find X2 and Doogee DG500C (Discovery)? (compare specs) (which is better)

The main differences, why it is better to choose the Oppo Find X2 (advantages)

  • NFC supports.
  • Have fast charging supports.

Why it is better not to take Oppo Find X2 (disadvantages)

The main differences, why it is better to choose the Doogee DG500C (Discovery) (advantages)

Why it is better not to take Doogee DG500C (Discovery) (disadvantages)

  • Does not support NFC.
  • Does not have fast charging support

The advantages of both models

Oppo Find X2 related comparisons

Doogee DG500C (Discovery) related comparisons

Rate this page: 1-5
4.82/5 of 11
Frequent comparisons