Compare Samsung Galaxy A72 6/128GB vs Oppo Reno 4F
| Name | Samsung Galaxy A72 6/128GB | Oppo Reno 4F |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Antutu benchmark | 277688 | 206923 |
| CPU | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G | MediaTek Helio P95 |
| Diagonal size | 6.7 " | 6.43 " |
| Resolution | 2400x1080 | 2400x1080 |
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 10 |
| RAM | 6 Gb | 8 Gb |
| Bezel-less | Yes | Yes |
| ROM | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| External memory | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb |
| Rear camera | 64 Mp | 48 Mp |
| Camera | Four cameras | Four cameras |
| Sensor model | Sony IMX586 | |
| dxomark mobile ranking | ||
| dxomark (photo) | ||
| dxomark (video) | ||
| Front (selfie) camera | 32 Mp | 16 Mp |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 4000 mAh |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Network | 4 G | 4 G |
| WiFi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS |
| Notifications Led | No | Yes |
| Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | Yes |
| Operating system (OS) | Android 11 | Android 10.0 (Q) |
| Material | Metal frame and plastic case | Metal frame and glass case |
| Weight | 203 g | 164 g |
| Dimensions | 165 x 77,4 x 8,4 mm | 160.14 x 73.7 x 7.48 mm |
| Price |
Notify me when it goes on sale.
View all Samsung models here
Alternatives to the Samsung Galaxy A72 6/128GB: Samsung Galaxy A34 5G 6/256GB - Compare Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra 12/128GB - Compare Samsung Galaxy A80 - Compare |
Notify me when it goes on sale.
View all Oppo models here
Alternatives to the Oppo Reno 4F: Oppo Reno 9 Pro 5G - Compare Oppo K10 Pro 5G 8/256GB - Compare Oppo K10 5G 8/256GB - Compare |
Samsung Galaxy A72 6/128GB vs Oppo Reno 4F: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Samsung Galaxy A72’s camera vs Oppo Reno 4F’s camera, see the difference between the 64Mp sensor and the 48Mp Sony IMX586 sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | Samsung Galaxy A72 6/128GB | Oppo Reno 4F |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 64 Mp | 48 Mp |
| Sensor model | Sony IMX586 | |
| Flash | Dual LED flash | Dual LED flash |
| Front (selfie) camera | 32 Mp | 16 Mp |
| Flash | No | No |
Samsung Galaxy A72 6/128GB vs Oppo Reno 4F: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Samsung Galaxy A72 vs Oppo Reno 4F, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | Samsung Galaxy A72 6/128GB | Oppo Reno 4F |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 4000 mAh |
| Type | Non-removable | Non-removable |
| Stand-by time | 6-7 days | 6-7 days |
| Battery Life | 3-4 days | 3-4 days |
| Working hours in hard mode | 8-9 hours | 8-9 hours |
| Talk time | 30 hours | 30 hours |
| Fast charging | Yes | Yes |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
Samsung Galaxy A72 6/128GB vs Oppo Reno 4F: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Samsung Galaxy A72 6/128GB in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 277688 score points which is 34.20% faster than the Oppo Reno 4F, which got 206923. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Samsung Galaxy A72 6/128GB vs Oppo Reno 4F: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Samsung Galaxy A72 6/128GB in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 551 points score in "Single-core" of against the Oppo Reno 4F which got 403, it is 36.72% faster. In "Multi-core" score 1745 vs 1485 (17.51% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Samsung Galaxy A72 6/128GB and Oppo Reno 4F? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Samsung Galaxy A72 6/128GB (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 34.20% faster in the Antutu test (70765 score difference).
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 64Mp compared to 48Mp Sony IMX586
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 32Mp vs 16Mp .
- More battery capacity: 5000mAh vs 4000mAh (a difference of 1000mAh).
- Have water resistant supports.
Why it is better not to take Samsung Galaxy A72 6/128GB (disadvantages)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Oppo Reno 4F (advantages)
- Best weight: 39 grams less (164 vs 203).
Why it is better not to take Oppo Reno 4F (disadvantages)
- Does not have water resistant supports.
The advantages of both models
- NFC supports.
- Have fast charging supports.
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Samsung Galaxy A72 6/128GB related comparisons
- Compare Samsung Galaxy A72 vs Samsung Galaxy A72 5G
- Compare Samsung Galaxy S20 FE vs Samsung Galaxy A72
- Compare Samsung Galaxy S20 vs Samsung Galaxy A72
- Compare Samsung Galaxy A53 5G vs Samsung Galaxy A72
- Compare Samsung Galaxy S20 Plus vs Samsung Galaxy A72
Oppo Reno 4F related comparisons
- Compare Oppo Reno 4F vs Oppo A95
- Compare Oppo Reno 4F vs Realme 8
- Compare Oppo Reno 4F vs Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
- Compare Oppo Reno 4F vs Oppo A54 4G
- Compare Oppo A93 vs Oppo Reno 4F