Compare Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb vs Ramos M7-c

Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb vs Ramos M7-c Comparison - Compare Size, Cameras, Specs, Features, Price of Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb with Ramos M7-c.
Name	Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb	Ramos M7-c

Antutu benchmark	38695
CPU	MediaTek MT6753	MediaTek MT6753
Diagonal size	5 "	5 "
Resolution	1280x720	1280x720
Multi-touch (number of touches)	5	5
RAM	3 Gb	2 Gb
Bezel-less	No	No
ROM	16 GB	16 GB
External memory	MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 128Gb	MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 32Gb
Rear camera	8 Mp	13 Mp
Camera	Single camera	Single camera
Sensor model
dxomark mobile ranking
dxomark (photo)
dxomark (video)
Front (selfie) camera	2 Mp	5 Mp
Battery	5020 mAh	5000 mAh
Wireless charging
Network	4 G	4 G
WiFi	Yes	Yes
Bluetooth	Yes	Yes
NFC	No
Navigation (Positioning)	GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS	GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS
Notifications Led	Yes
Fingerprint's scanner	Yes
Operating system (OS)	Android 7.0	Android 5.1
Material	Metal
Weight	149 g	162 g
Dimensions	144 x 70,1 x 8,6 mm	142 x 70 x 9,6 mm
Price	Discontinued. View all Vernee models here Alternatives to the Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb:	Notify me when it goes on sale. View all Ramos models here Alternatives to the Ramos M7-c:

Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb vs Ramos M7-c: Camera comparison.

In this table, you can compare the Vernee Thor E’s camera vs Ramos M7-c’s camera, see the difference between the 8Mp sensor and the 13Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.

Name	Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb	Ramos M7-c
Rear camera	8 Mp	13 Mp
Sensor model
Flash	LED flash
Front (selfie) camera	2 Mp	5 Mp
Flash	No

Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb vs Ramos M7-c: battery life comparison.

Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Vernee Thor E vs Ramos M7-c, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.

Name	Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb	Ramos M7-c
Battery	5020 mAh	5000 mAh
Type	Non-removable	Removable
Stand-by time	6-7 days
Battery Life	3-4 days
Working hours in hard mode	10-12 hours
Talk time	30 hours
Fast charging	Yes
Wireless charging

Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb vs Ramos M7-c: Antutu benchmark comparison.

Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 38695 score points which is 100.00% faster than the Ramos M7-c, which got 0. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.

Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb

5 inches (1280x720) Curved Glass / MT6753 / 3Gb / 16GB / 8Mp / 5020mAh

0.00€

$0.00

38695

Ramos M7-c

5" (1280x720) / MT6753 / 2Gb / 16GB / 13Mp / 5000mAh

On Sale Soon

Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb vs Ramos M7-c: Geekbench benchmark comparison.

Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 116 points score in "Single-core" of against the Ramos M7-c which got 112, it is 3.57% faster. In "Multi-core" score 603 vs 610 (-1.15% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.

Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb

5 inches (1280x720) Curved Glass / MT6753 / 3Gb / 16GB / 8Mp / 5020mAh

0.00€

$0.00

116 / 603

Ramos M7-c

5" (1280x720) / MT6753 / 2Gb / 16GB / 13Mp / 5000mAh

On Sale Soon

112 / 610

What is the difference between Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb and Ramos M7-c? (compare specs) (which is better)

The main differences, why it is better to choose the Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb (advantages)

Best weight: 13 grams less (149 vs 162).
More battery capacity: 5020mAh vs 5000mAh (a difference of 20mAh).
Have fast charging supports.

Why it is better not to take Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb (disadvantages)

The main differences, why it is better to choose the Ramos M7-c (advantages)

Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 13Mp compared to 8Mp
Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 5Mp vs 2Mp .

Why it is better not to take Ramos M7-c (disadvantages)

Does not have fast charging support

The advantages of both models

Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.

Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb related comparisons

Ramos M7-c related comparisons

Rate this page: 1-5

4.63/5 of 296

Frequent comparisons