Compare Samsung Galaxy A15 5G vs IIIF150 B2 Ultra
Name | Samsung Galaxy A15 5G | IIIF150 B2 Ultra |
---|---|---|
![]() |
![]() |
|
Antutu benchmark | 387883 | 367366 |
CPU | MediaTek Dimensity 6100+ | MediaTek Helio G99 |
Diagonal size | 6.5 " | 6.78 " |
Resolution | 2340x1080 | 2408x1080 |
Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 10 |
RAM | 8 Gb | 12 Gb |
Bezel-less | Yes | No |
ROM | 256 GB | 256 GB |
External memory | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb |
Rear camera | 50 Mp | 200 Mp |
Camera | Triple Camera | Dual Camera |
Sensor model | Samsung ISOCELL HP3 | |
dxomark mobile ranking | ||
dxomark (photo) | ||
dxomark (video) | ||
Front (selfie) camera | 13 Mp | 32 Mp |
Battery | 5000 mAh | 15000 mAh |
Wireless charging | No | No |
Network | 5 G | 4 G |
WiFi | Yes | Yes |
Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
NFC | Yes | Yes |
Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS |
Notifications Led | No | Yes |
Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | Yes |
Operating system (OS) | Android 14 | Android 13 |
Material | Plastic | Plastics and rubber |
Weight | 200 g | 465 g |
Dimensions | 160.1 x 76.8 x 8.4 mm | 176.4 x 81.8 x 19.9 mm |
Price |
Notify me when it goes on sale.
View all Samsung models here
Alternatives to the Samsung Galaxy A15 5G: Samsung Galaxy A01 - Compare Samsung Galaxy A53 5G 8/256GB - Compare Samsung Galaxy A54 5G 8/128GB - Compare |
Discontinued.
View all IIIF150 models here
Alternatives to the IIIF150 B2 Ultra: IIIF150 H2022 - Compare IIIF150 B1 Pro - Compare IIIF150 B3 Pro - Compare |
Samsung Galaxy A15 5G vs IIIF150 B2 Ultra: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Samsung Galaxy A15 5G’s camera vs IIIF150 B2 Ultra’s camera, see the difference between the 50Mp sensor and the 200Mp Samsung ISOCELL HP3 sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
Name | Samsung Galaxy A15 5G | IIIF150 B2 Ultra |
---|---|---|
Rear camera | 50 Mp | 200 Mp |
Sensor model | Samsung ISOCELL HP3 | |
Flash | LED flash | Dual LED flash |
Front (selfie) camera | 13 Mp | 32 Mp |
Flash | No | No |
Samsung Galaxy A15 5G vs IIIF150 B2 Ultra: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Samsung Galaxy A15 5G vs IIIF150 B2 Ultra, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
Name | Samsung Galaxy A15 5G | IIIF150 B2 Ultra |
---|---|---|
Battery | 5000 mAh | 15000 mAh |
Type | Non-removable | Non-removable |
Stand-by time | 6-7 days | 8-9 days |
Battery Life | 3-4 days | 5-6 days |
Working hours in hard mode | 8-9 hours | 10-12 hours |
Talk time | 30 hours | 30 hours |
Fast charging | Yes | Yes |
Wireless charging | No | No |
Samsung Galaxy A15 5G vs IIIF150 B2 Ultra: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Samsung Galaxy A15 5G in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 387883 score points which is 5.58% faster than the IIIF150 B2 Ultra, which got 367366. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Samsung Galaxy A15 5G vs IIIF150 B2 Ultra: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Samsung Galaxy A15 5G in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 651 points score in "Single-core" of against the IIIF150 B2 Ultra which got 595, it is 9.41% faster. In "Multi-core" score 1973 vs 1921 (2.71% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Samsung Galaxy A15 5G and IIIF150 B2 Ultra? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Samsung Galaxy A15 5G (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 5.58% faster in the Antutu test (20517 score difference).
- Best weight: 265 grams less (200 vs 465).
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Why it is better not to take Samsung Galaxy A15 5G (disadvantages)
- Does not have water resistant supports.
The main differences, why it is better to choose the IIIF150 B2 Ultra (advantages)
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 200Mp Samsung ISOCELL HP3 compared to 50Mp
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 32Mp vs 13Mp .
- Has a higher screen resolution: 2408x1080 vs 2340x1080.
- More battery capacity: 15000mAh vs 5000mAh (a difference of 10000mAh).
- Have water resistant supports.
Why it is better not to take IIIF150 B2 Ultra (disadvantages)
- Does not have Headphone Jack. Need audio 3.5mm headphone jack adapter
The advantages of both models
- NFC supports.
- Have fast charging supports.
Samsung Galaxy A15 5G related comparisons
- Compare Samsung Galaxy A15 5G vs Samsung Galaxy A24 4G
- Compare Samsung Galaxy A15 5G vs Samsung Galaxy A05s
- Compare Samsung Galaxy A34 5G vs Samsung Galaxy A15 5G
- Compare Samsung Galaxy A15 5G vs Samsung Galaxy A14 5G
- Compare Samsung Galaxy A15 5G vs Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
IIIF150 B2 Ultra related comparisons
- Compare IIIF150 B2 Ultra vs IIIF150 B2 Pro
- Compare IIIF150 B2 Ultra vs IIIF150 B1 Pro
- Compare IIIF150 B2 Ultra vs IIIF150 Raptor
- Compare IIIF150 B2 Ultra vs IIIF150 R2022
- Compare IIIF150 B2 Ultra vs Cubot King Kong Star