Compare Ulefone Armor 9E vs Samsung Galaxy A20
| Name | Ulefone Armor 9E | Samsung Galaxy A20 |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Antutu benchmark | 223811 | 90211 |
| CPU | MediaTek Helio P90 | Samsung Exynos 7884B |
| Diagonal size | 6.3 " | 6.4 " |
| Resolution | 2340x1080 | 1560x720 |
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 10 |
| RAM | 8 Gb | 3 Gb |
| Bezel-less | No | Yes |
| ROM | 128 GB | 32 GB |
| External memory | MicroSD (TF), support of card up to 2Tb | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb |
| Rear camera | 64 Mp | 13 Mp |
| Camera | Four cameras | Dual Camera |
| Sensor model | Samsung GW1 | |
| dxomark mobile ranking | ||
| dxomark (photo) | ||
| dxomark (video) | ||
| Front (selfie) camera | 8 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Battery | 6600 mAh | 4000 mAh |
| Wireless charging | Yes | No |
| Network | 4 G | 4 G |
| WiFi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS |
| Notifications Led | Yes | No |
| Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | Yes |
| Operating system (OS) | Android 10.0 (Q) | Android 10.0 (Q) |
| Material | Plastics and rubber | Plastic |
| Weight | 320 g | 169 g |
| Dimensions | 168.2 x 82 x 15 mm | 158,4 x 74,7 x 7,8 mm |
| Price | 340.31€ ($366.46) See Details | 84.93€ ($91.46) See Details |
Ulefone Armor 9E vs Samsung Galaxy A20: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Ulefone Armor 9E’s camera vs Samsung Galaxy A20’s camera, see the difference between the 64Mp Samsung GW1 sensor and the 13Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | Ulefone Armor 9E | Samsung Galaxy A20 |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 64 Mp | 13 Mp |
| Sensor model | Samsung GW1 | |
| Flash | Dual LED flash | Dual LED flash |
| Front (selfie) camera | 8 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Flash | No | No |
Ulefone Armor 9E vs Samsung Galaxy A20: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Ulefone Armor 9E vs Samsung Galaxy A20, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | Ulefone Armor 9E | Samsung Galaxy A20 |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 6600 mAh | 4000 mAh |
| Type | Non-removable | Non-removable |
| Stand-by time | 6-7 days | 6-7 days |
| Battery Life | 3-4 days | 3-4 days |
| Working hours in hard mode | 14-15 hours | 8-9 hours |
| Talk time | 30 hours | 30 hours |
| Fast charging | Yes | Yes |
| Wireless charging | Yes | No |
Ulefone Armor 9E vs Samsung Galaxy A20: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Ulefone Armor 9E in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 223811 score points which is 148.10% faster than the Samsung Galaxy A20, which got 90211. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Ulefone Armor 9E vs Samsung Galaxy A20: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Ulefone Armor 9E in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 417 points score in "Single-core" of against the Samsung Galaxy A20 which got 242, it is 72.31% faster. In "Multi-core" score 1531 vs 742 (106.33% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Ulefone Armor 9E and Samsung Galaxy A20? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Ulefone Armor 9E (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 148.10% faster in the Antutu test (133600 score difference).
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 64Mp Samsung GW1 compared to 13Mp
- Has a higher screen resolution: 2340x1080 vs 1560x720.
- More battery capacity: 6600mAh vs 4000mAh (a difference of 2600mAh).
- Have water resistant supports.
- Have wireless charging supports.
Why it is better not to take Ulefone Armor 9E (disadvantages)
- Does not have Headphone Jack. Need audio 3.5mm headphone jack adapter
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Samsung Galaxy A20 (advantages)
- Best weight: 151 grams less (169 vs 320).
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Why it is better not to take Samsung Galaxy A20 (disadvantages)
- Does not have water resistant supports.
- Does not have wireless charging support.
The advantages of both models
- NFC supports.
- Have fast charging supports.
Ulefone Armor 9E related comparisons
- Compare Blackview BV9800 Pro vs Ulefone Armor 9E
- Compare Ulefone Armor 7 vs Ulefone Armor 9E
- Compare Blackview BV9800 vs Ulefone Armor 9E
- Compare Ulefone Armor 9 vs Ulefone Armor 9E
- Compare Ulefone Armor 6S vs Ulefone Armor 9E
Samsung Galaxy A20 related comparisons
- Compare Samsung Galaxy A13 5G vs Samsung Galaxy A20
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi 9 vs Samsung Galaxy A20
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Global vs Samsung Galaxy A20
- Compare Samsung Galaxy A14 5G vs Samsung Galaxy A20
- Compare Samsung Galaxy A02s vs Samsung Galaxy A20