Compare Samsung Galaxy A35 5G vs Hotwav Cyber 15
| Name | Samsung Galaxy A35 5G | Hotwav Cyber 15 |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Antutu benchmark | 507683 | 359844 |
| CPU | Samsung Exynos 1380 | MediaTek Helio G99 |
| Diagonal size | 6.64 " | 6.6 " |
| Resolution | 2340x1080 | 2400x1080 |
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 10 |
| RAM | 6 Gb | 12 Gb |
| Bezel-less | Yes | No |
| ROM | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| External memory | MicroSD (TF), support of card up to 2Tb | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb |
| Rear camera | 50 Mp | 200 Mp |
| Camera | Triple Camera | Triple Camera |
| Sensor model | Sony LYT600 | Samsung ISOCELL HP3 |
| dxomark mobile ranking | ||
| dxomark (photo) | ||
| dxomark (video) | ||
| Front (selfie) camera | 13 Mp | 32 Mp |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 6280 mAh |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Network | 5 G | 5 G |
| WiFi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS |
| Notifications Led | No | Yes |
| Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | Yes |
| Operating system (OS) | Android 14 | Android 13 |
| Material | Plastic | Plastics and rubber |
| Weight | 209 g | 292 g |
| Dimensions | 161.7 x 78 x 8.2 mm | 174.6 x 82.3 x 12.8 mm |
| Price |
Notify me when it goes on sale.
View all Samsung models here
Alternatives to the Samsung Galaxy A35 5G: Samsung Galaxy A70 8/128Gb - Compare Samsung Galaxy A53 5G 8/128GB - Compare Samsung Galaxy A31 4/64GB - Compare |
Notify me when it goes on sale.
View all Hotwav models here
Alternatives to the Hotwav Cyber 15: Hotwav CYBER 7 5G - Compare Hotwav T5 Max - Compare Hotwav Cyber X Pro - Compare |
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G vs Hotwav Cyber 15: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Samsung Galaxy A35 5G’s camera vs Hotwav Cyber 15’s camera, see the difference between the 50Mp Sony LYT600 sensor and the 200Mp Samsung ISOCELL HP3 sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | Samsung Galaxy A35 5G | Hotwav Cyber 15 |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 50 Mp | 200 Mp |
| Sensor model | Sony LYT600 | Samsung ISOCELL HP3 |
| Flash | Dual LED flash | Dual LED flash |
| Front (selfie) camera | 13 Mp | 32 Mp |
| Flash | No | No |
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G vs Hotwav Cyber 15: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Samsung Galaxy A35 5G vs Hotwav Cyber 15, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | Samsung Galaxy A35 5G | Hotwav Cyber 15 |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 6280 mAh |
| Type | Non-removable | Non-removable |
| Stand-by time | 6-7 days | 6-7 days |
| Battery Life | 3-4 days | 3-4 days |
| Working hours in hard mode | 10-12 hours | 10-12 hours |
| Talk time | 30 hours | 30 hours |
| Fast charging | Yes | Yes |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G vs Hotwav Cyber 15: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 507683 score points which is 41.08% faster than the Hotwav Cyber 15, which got 359844. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G vs Hotwav Cyber 15: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 788 points score in "Single-core" of against the Hotwav Cyber 15 which got 588, it is 34.01% faster. In "Multi-core" score 2667 vs 1915 (39.27% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Samsung Galaxy A35 5G and Hotwav Cyber 15? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Samsung Galaxy A35 5G (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 41.08% faster in the Antutu test (147839 score difference).
- Best weight: 83 grams less (209 vs 292).
Why it is better not to take Samsung Galaxy A35 5G (disadvantages)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Hotwav Cyber 15 (advantages)
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 200Mp Samsung ISOCELL HP3 compared to 50Mp Sony LYT600
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 32Mp Sony IMX616 vs 13Mp .
- Has a higher screen resolution: 2400x1080 vs 2340x1080.
- More battery capacity: 6280mAh vs 5000mAh (a difference of 1280mAh).
Why it is better not to take Hotwav Cyber 15 (disadvantages)
The advantages of both models
- NFC supports.
- Have water resistant supports.
- Have fast charging supports.
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G related comparisons
- Compare Samsung Galaxy A35 5G vs Samsung Galaxy A16 5G
- Compare Samsung Galaxy A35 5G vs Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
- Compare Samsung Galaxy A35 5G vs Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
- Compare Samsung Galaxy A35 5G vs Samsung Galaxy A53 5G
- Compare Samsung Galaxy S22 vs Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Hotwav Cyber 15 related comparisons
- Compare Hotwav Cyber 15 vs Hotwav Cyber 13 Pro
- Compare Hotwav Cyber 15 vs Hotwav W11
- Compare Hotwav Cyber 15 vs Hotwav H1
- Compare Hotwav Cyber 15 vs Hotwav Cyber X Pro
- Compare Hotwav Cyber 15 vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G