Compare Samsung Galaxy A35 5G vs IIIF150 B2021
| Name | Samsung Galaxy A35 5G | IIIF150 B2021 |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Antutu benchmark | 507683 | 102775 |
| CPU | Samsung Exynos 1380 | MediaTek Helio G25 |
| Diagonal size | 6.64 " | 5.86 " |
| Resolution | 2340x1080 | 1520x720 |
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 10 |
| RAM | 6 Gb | 6 Gb |
| Bezel-less | Yes | Yes |
| ROM | 128 GB | 64 GB |
| External memory | MicroSD (TF), support of card up to 2Tb | MicroSD (TF), support of card up to 2Tb |
| Rear camera | 50 Mp | 13 Mp |
| Camera | Triple Camera | Four cameras |
| Sensor model | Sony LYT600 | |
| dxomark mobile ranking | ||
| dxomark (photo) | ||
| dxomark (video) | ||
| Front (selfie) camera | 13 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 8000 mAh |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Network | 5 G | 4 G |
| WiFi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS |
| Notifications Led | No | No |
| Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | Yes |
| Operating system (OS) | Android 14 | Android 10.0 (Q) |
| Material | Plastic | Plastic |
| Weight | 209 g | 315 g |
| Dimensions | 161.7 x 78 x 8.2 mm | 158 x 78 x 18 mm |
| Price |
Notify me when it goes on sale.
View all Samsung models here
Alternatives to the Samsung Galaxy A35 5G: Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite - Compare Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra 12/512GB - Compare Samsung Galaxy M53 5G 8/128GB - Compare |
117.34€ ($137.75) See Details |
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G vs IIIF150 B2021: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Samsung Galaxy A35 5G’s camera vs IIIF150 B2021’s camera, see the difference between the 50Mp Sony LYT600 sensor and the 13Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | Samsung Galaxy A35 5G | IIIF150 B2021 |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 50 Mp | 13 Mp |
| Sensor model | Sony LYT600 | |
| Flash | Dual LED flash | LED flash |
| Front (selfie) camera | 13 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Flash | No | No |
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G vs IIIF150 B2021: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Samsung Galaxy A35 5G vs IIIF150 B2021, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | Samsung Galaxy A35 5G | IIIF150 B2021 |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 8000 mAh |
| Type | Non-removable | Non-removable |
| Stand-by time | 6-7 days | 8-9 days |
| Battery Life | 3-4 days | 3-4 days |
| Working hours in hard mode | 10-12 hours | 14-15 hours |
| Talk time | 30 hours | 30 hours |
| Fast charging | Yes | Yes |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G vs IIIF150 B2021: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 507683 score points which is 393.98% faster than the IIIF150 B2021, which got 102775. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G vs IIIF150 B2021: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 788 points score in "Single-core" of against the IIIF150 B2021 which got 172, it is 358.14% faster. In "Multi-core" score 2667 vs 967 (175.80% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Samsung Galaxy A35 5G and IIIF150 B2021? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Samsung Galaxy A35 5G (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 393.98% faster in the Antutu test (404908 score difference).
- Best weight: 106 grams less (209 vs 315).
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 50Mp Sony LYT600 compared to 13Mp
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 13Mp vs 8Mp .
- Has a higher screen resolution: 2340x1080 vs 1520x720.
Why it is better not to take Samsung Galaxy A35 5G (disadvantages)
- Does not have Headphone Jack. Need audio 3.5mm headphone jack adapter
The main differences, why it is better to choose the IIIF150 B2021 (advantages)
- More battery capacity: 8000mAh vs 5000mAh (a difference of 3000mAh).
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Why it is better not to take IIIF150 B2021 (disadvantages)
The advantages of both models
- NFC supports.
- Have water resistant supports.
- Have fast charging supports.
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G related comparisons
- Compare Samsung Galaxy A35 5G vs Samsung Galaxy A16 5G
- Compare Samsung Galaxy A35 5G vs Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
- Compare Samsung Galaxy A35 5G vs Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
- Compare Samsung Galaxy A35 5G vs Samsung Galaxy A53 5G
- Compare Samsung Galaxy S22 vs Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
IIIF150 B2021 related comparisons
- Compare OUKITEL WP5 Pro vs F150 B2021
- Compare UMIDIGI Bison vs F150 B2021
- Compare F150 B2021 vs OUKITEL WP8 Pro
- Compare Doogee S59 Pro vs F150 B2021
- Compare OUKITEL WP5 vs F150 B2021