Compare Samsung Galaxy A52 5G vs OUKITEL C32
| Name | Samsung Galaxy A52 5G | OUKITEL C32 |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Antutu benchmark | 326155 | 165488 |
| CPU | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G | UNISOC Tiger T606 |
| Diagonal size | 6.5 " | 6.51 " |
| Resolution | 2400x1080 | 1600x720 |
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 10 |
| RAM | 6 Gb | 8 Gb |
| Bezel-less | Yes | Yes |
| ROM | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| External memory | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb |
| Rear camera | 64 Mp | 20 Mp |
| Camera | Four cameras | Triple Camera |
| Sensor model | Sony IMX682 | Sony IMX376 |
| dxomark mobile ranking | ||
| dxomark (photo) | ||
| dxomark (video) | ||
| Front (selfie) camera | 32 Mp | 5 Mp |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5150 mAh |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Network | 5 G | 4 G |
| WiFi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS |
| Notifications Led | No | No |
| Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | Yes |
| Operating system (OS) | Android 10.0 (Q) | Android 12 |
| Material | Metal frame and plastic case | Plastic |
| Weight | 187 g | 198 g |
| Dimensions | 159,9 x 75,1 x 8,4 mm | 164 x 76 x 9.2 mm |
| Price |
Notify me when it goes on sale.
View all Samsung models here
Alternatives to the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G: Samsung Galaxy A51 5G 6/128Gb - Compare Samsung Galaxy A14 5G - Compare Samsung Galaxy A22s 5G 4/128GB - Compare |
93.50€ ($99.99) See Details |
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G vs OUKITEL C32: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G’s camera vs OUKITEL C32’s camera, see the difference between the 64Mp Sony IMX682 sensor and the 20Mp Sony IMX376 sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | Samsung Galaxy A52 5G | OUKITEL C32 |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 64 Mp | 20 Mp |
| Sensor model | Sony IMX682 | Sony IMX376 |
| Flash | Dual LED flash | LED flash |
| Front (selfie) camera | 32 Mp | 5 Mp |
| Flash | No | No |
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G vs OUKITEL C32: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G vs OUKITEL C32, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | Samsung Galaxy A52 5G | OUKITEL C32 |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5150 mAh |
| Type | Non-removable | Non-removable |
| Stand-by time | 6-7 days | 6-7 days |
| Battery Life | 3-4 days | 2-3 days |
| Working hours in hard mode | 10-12 hours | 8-9 hours |
| Talk time | 30 hours | 30 hours |
| Fast charging | Yes | No |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G vs OUKITEL C32: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 326155 score points which is 97.09% faster than the OUKITEL C32, which got 165488. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G vs OUKITEL C32: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 613 points score in "Single-core" of against the OUKITEL C32 which got 315, it is 94.60% faster. In "Multi-core" score 1916 vs 1183 (61.96% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Samsung Galaxy A52 5G and OUKITEL C32? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 97.09% faster in the Antutu test (160667 score difference).
- Best weight: 11 grams less (187 vs 198).
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 64Mp Sony IMX682 compared to 20Mp Sony IMX376
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 32Mp Samsung S5KGD1 vs 5Mp .
- NFC supports.
- Has a higher screen resolution: 2400x1080 vs 1600x720.
- Have water resistant supports.
- Have fast charging supports.
Why it is better not to take Samsung Galaxy A52 5G (disadvantages)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the OUKITEL C32 (advantages)
- More battery capacity: 5150mAh vs 5000mAh (a difference of 150mAh).
Why it is better not to take OUKITEL C32 (disadvantages)
- Does not support NFC.
- Does not have water resistant supports.
- Does not have fast charging support
The advantages of both models
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G related comparisons
- Compare Samsung Galaxy A52s vs Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
- Compare Samsung Galaxy A32 5G vs Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
- Compare Samsung Galaxy S20 FE vs Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
- Compare Samsung Galaxy A71 vs Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
- Compare Samsung Galaxy A53 5G vs Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
OUKITEL C32 related comparisons
- Compare OUKITEL C31 Pro vs OUKITEL C32
- Compare OUKITEL C32 vs Blackview Oscal C80
- Compare OUKITEL C33 vs OUKITEL C32
- Compare OUKITEL C32 vs Cubot P60
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 2023 vs OUKITEL C32