Compare Samsung Galaxy A52 5G vs UMIDIGI Bison GT
| Name | Samsung Galaxy A52 5G | UMIDIGI Bison GT |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Antutu benchmark | 326155 | 312667 |
| CPU | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G | MediaTek Helio G95 |
| Diagonal size | 6.5 " | 6.67 " |
| Resolution | 2400x1080 | 2400x1080 |
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 10 |
| RAM | 6 Gb | 8 Gb |
| Bezel-less | Yes | No |
| ROM | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| External memory | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb |
| Rear camera | 64 Mp | 64 Mp |
| Camera | Four cameras | Four cameras |
| Sensor model | Sony IMX682 | |
| dxomark mobile ranking | ||
| dxomark (photo) | ||
| dxomark (video) | ||
| Front (selfie) camera | 32 Mp | 32 Mp |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5150 mAh |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Network | 5 G | 4 G |
| WiFi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS |
| Notifications Led | No | No |
| Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | Yes |
| Operating system (OS) | Android 10.0 (Q) | Android 10.0 (Q) |
| Material | Metal frame and plastic case | Plastics and rubber |
| Weight | 187 g | 283 g |
| Dimensions | 159,9 x 75,1 x 8,4 mm | 170.3 x 82.5 x 12.8 mm |
| Price |
Notify me when it goes on sale.
View all Samsung models here
Alternatives to the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G: Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5 - Compare Samsung Galaxy A51 4/64Gb - Compare Samsung Galaxy A22 4G - Compare |
Discontinued.
View all UMIDIGI models here
Alternatives to the UMIDIGI Bison GT: UMIDIGI Bison 8/128Gb - Compare UMIDIGI A11 3/64Gb - Compare UMIDIGI A9 Pro 4/64Gb - Compare |
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G vs UMIDIGI Bison GT: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G’s camera vs UMIDIGI Bison GT’s camera, see the difference between the 64Mp Sony IMX682 sensor and the 64Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | Samsung Galaxy A52 5G | UMIDIGI Bison GT |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 64 Mp | 64 Mp |
| Sensor model | Sony IMX682 | |
| Flash | Dual LED flash | Dual LED flash |
| Front (selfie) camera | 32 Mp | 32 Mp |
| Flash | No | No |
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G vs UMIDIGI Bison GT: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G vs UMIDIGI Bison GT, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | Samsung Galaxy A52 5G | UMIDIGI Bison GT |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5150 mAh |
| Type | Non-removable | Non-removable |
| Stand-by time | 6-7 days | 6-7 days |
| Battery Life | 3-4 days | 3-4 days |
| Working hours in hard mode | 10-12 hours | 10-12 hours |
| Talk time | 30 hours | 30 hours |
| Fast charging | Yes | Yes |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G vs UMIDIGI Bison GT: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 326155 score points which is 4.31% faster than the UMIDIGI Bison GT, which got 312667. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G vs UMIDIGI Bison GT: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 613 points score in "Single-core" of against the UMIDIGI Bison GT which got 425, it is 44.24% faster. In "Multi-core" score 1916 vs 1552 (23.45% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Samsung Galaxy A52 5G and UMIDIGI Bison GT? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 4.31% faster in the Antutu test (13488 score difference).
- Best weight: 96 grams less (187 vs 283).
Why it is better not to take Samsung Galaxy A52 5G (disadvantages)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the UMIDIGI Bison GT (advantages)
- More battery capacity: 5150mAh vs 5000mAh (a difference of 150mAh).
Why it is better not to take UMIDIGI Bison GT (disadvantages)
The advantages of both models
- NFC supports.
- Have water resistant supports.
- Have fast charging supports.
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G related comparisons
- Compare Samsung Galaxy A52s vs Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
- Compare Samsung Galaxy A32 5G vs Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
- Compare Samsung Galaxy S20 FE vs Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
- Compare Samsung Galaxy A71 vs Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
- Compare Samsung Galaxy A53 5G vs Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
UMIDIGI Bison GT related comparisons
- Compare UMIDIGI Bison GT vs UMIDIGI Bison
- Compare UMIDIGI Bison GT vs Doogee S96 Pro
- Compare UMIDIGI Bison GT vs UMIDIGI Bison Pro
- Compare UMIDIGI Bison GT vs UMIDIGI Bison X10 Pro
- Compare Ulefone Armor 11 vs UMIDIGI Bison GT