Compare Samsung Galaxy A52 5G vs Vivo IQOO U1 5G
| Name | Samsung Galaxy A52 5G | Vivo IQOO U1 5G |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Antutu benchmark | 326155 | 307335 |
| CPU | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G | MediaTek Dimensity 800U |
| Diagonal size | 6.5 " | 6.53 " |
| Resolution | 2400x1080 | 2340x1080 |
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 10 |
| RAM | 6 Gb | 6 Gb |
| Bezel-less | Yes | No |
| ROM | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| External memory | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb |
| Rear camera | 64 Mp | 48 Mp |
| Camera | Four cameras | Triple Camera |
| Sensor model | Sony IMX682 | |
| dxomark mobile ranking | ||
| dxomark (photo) | ||
| dxomark (video) | ||
| Front (selfie) camera | 32 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 4500 mAh |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Network | 5 G | 5 G |
| WiFi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS |
| Notifications Led | No | No |
| Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | Yes |
| Operating system (OS) | Android 10.0 (Q) | Android 10.0 (Q) |
| Material | Metal frame and plastic case | Plastic |
| Weight | 187 g | 190 g |
| Dimensions | 159,9 x 75,1 x 8,4 mm | 162.1 × 76.6 × 8.5 mm |
| Price |
Notify me when it goes on sale.
View all Samsung models here
Alternatives to the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G: Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra - Compare Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra 8/256GB - Compare Samsung Galaxy A60 6/64Gb - Compare |
Notify me when it goes on sale.
View all Vivo models here
Alternatives to the Vivo IQOO U1 5G: Vivo IQOO Neo 7 SE 8/128GB - Compare Vivo X90 12/512GB - Compare Vivo V29 - Compare |
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G vs Vivo IQOO U1 5G: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G’s camera vs Vivo IQOO U1 5G’s camera, see the difference between the 64Mp Sony IMX682 sensor and the 48Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | Samsung Galaxy A52 5G | Vivo IQOO U1 5G |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 64 Mp | 48 Mp |
| Sensor model | Sony IMX682 | |
| Flash | Dual LED flash | LED flash |
| Front (selfie) camera | 32 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Flash | No | No |
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G vs Vivo IQOO U1 5G: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G vs Vivo IQOO U1 5G, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | Samsung Galaxy A52 5G | Vivo IQOO U1 5G |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 4500 mAh |
| Type | Non-removable | Non-removable |
| Stand-by time | 6-7 days | 6-7 days |
| Battery Life | 3-4 days | 2-3 days |
| Working hours in hard mode | 10-12 hours | 8-9 hours |
| Talk time | 30 hours | 30 hours |
| Fast charging | Yes | Yes |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G vs Vivo IQOO U1 5G: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 326155 score points which is 6.12% faster than the Vivo IQOO U1 5G, which got 307335. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G vs Vivo IQOO U1 5G: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 613 points score in "Single-core" of against the Vivo IQOO U1 5G which got 573, it is 6.98% faster. In "Multi-core" score 1916 vs 1674 (14.46% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Samsung Galaxy A52 5G and Vivo IQOO U1 5G? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 6.12% faster in the Antutu test (18820 score difference).
- Best weight: 3 grams less (187 vs 190).
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 64Mp Sony IMX682 compared to 48Mp
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 32Mp Samsung S5KGD1 vs 8Mp .
- NFC supports.
- Has a higher screen resolution: 2400x1080 vs 2340x1080.
- More battery capacity: 5000mAh vs 4500mAh (a difference of 500mAh).
- Have water resistant supports.
Why it is better not to take Samsung Galaxy A52 5G (disadvantages)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Vivo IQOO U1 5G (advantages)
Why it is better not to take Vivo IQOO U1 5G (disadvantages)
- Does not support NFC.
- Does not have water resistant supports.
The advantages of both models
- Have fast charging supports.
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G related comparisons
- Compare Samsung Galaxy A52s vs Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
- Compare Samsung Galaxy A32 5G vs Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
- Compare Samsung Galaxy S20 FE vs Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
- Compare Samsung Galaxy A71 vs Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
- Compare Samsung Galaxy A53 5G vs Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Vivo IQOO U1 5G related comparisons
- Compare Vivo IQOO U1 5G vs Vivo iQOO U3
- Compare Vivo X60 vs Vivo IQOO U1 5G
- Compare Vivo iQOO Z1 vs Vivo IQOO U1 5G
- Compare Vivo IQOO 7 vs Vivo IQOO U1 5G
- Compare Vivo IQOO U1 5G vs Vivo S5