Compare Samsung Galaxy A53 5G 6/128GB vs Sharp Aquos R3
| Name | Samsung Galaxy A53 5G 6/128GB | Sharp Aquos R3 |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Antutu benchmark | 476833 | 365833 |
| CPU | Samsung Exynos 1280 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 |
| Diagonal size | 6.5 " | 6.2 " |
| Resolution | 2400x1080 | 3120x1440 |
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 10 |
| RAM | 6 Gb | 6 Gb |
| Bezel-less | Yes | Yes |
| ROM | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| External memory | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb | MicroSD (TF), support of card up to 2Tb |
| Rear camera | 64 Mp | 12 Mp |
| Camera | Four cameras | Dual Camera |
| Sensor model | Sony IMX686 | |
| dxomark mobile ranking | ||
| dxomark (photo) | ||
| dxomark (video) | ||
| Front (selfie) camera | 32 Mp | 16 Mp |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 3200 mAh |
| Wireless charging | No | Yes |
| Network | 5 G | 4 G |
| WiFi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS |
| Notifications Led | No | Yes |
| Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | Yes |
| Operating system (OS) | Android 12 | Android 9.0 |
| Material | Plastic | Metal |
| Weight | 189 g | 185 g |
| Dimensions | 159,6 x 74,8 x 8,1 mm | 156 x 74 x 8,9 mm |
| Price | 162.14€ ($187.26) See Details |
Notify me when it goes on sale.
View all Sharp models here
Alternatives to the Sharp Aquos R3: Sharp Aquos R2 Compact - Compare Sharp AQUOS S2 - Compare |
Samsung Galaxy A53 5G 6/128GB vs Sharp Aquos R3: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Samsung Galaxy A53 5G’s camera vs Sharp Aquos R3’s camera, see the difference between the 64Mp Sony IMX686 sensor and the 12Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | Samsung Galaxy A53 5G 6/128GB | Sharp Aquos R3 |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 64 Mp | 12 Mp |
| Sensor model | Sony IMX686 | |
| Flash | Dual LED flash | Dual LED flash |
| Front (selfie) camera | 32 Mp | 16 Mp |
| Flash | No | No |
Samsung Galaxy A53 5G 6/128GB vs Sharp Aquos R3: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Samsung Galaxy A53 5G vs Sharp Aquos R3, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | Samsung Galaxy A53 5G 6/128GB | Sharp Aquos R3 |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 3200 mAh |
| Type | Non-removable | Non-removable |
| Stand-by time | 6-7 days | 5-6 days |
| Battery Life | 3-4 days | 2-3 days |
| Working hours in hard mode | 10-12 hours | 6-7 hours |
| Talk time | 30 hours | 25 hours |
| Fast charging | Yes | Yes |
| Wireless charging | No | Yes |
Samsung Galaxy A53 5G 6/128GB vs Sharp Aquos R3: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Samsung Galaxy A53 5G 6/128GB in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 476833 score points which is 30.34% faster than the Sharp Aquos R3, which got 365833. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Samsung Galaxy A53 5G 6/128GB vs Sharp Aquos R3: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Samsung Galaxy A53 5G 6/128GB in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 687 points score in "Single-core" of against the Sharp Aquos R3 which got 681, it is 0.88% faster. In "Multi-core" score 2058 vs 2663 (-22.72% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Samsung Galaxy A53 5G 6/128GB and Sharp Aquos R3? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Samsung Galaxy A53 5G 6/128GB (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 30.34% faster in the Antutu test (111000 score difference).
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 64Mp Sony IMX686 compared to 12Mp
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 32Mp vs 16Mp .
- More battery capacity: 5000mAh vs 3200mAh (a difference of 1800mAh).
Why it is better not to take Samsung Galaxy A53 5G 6/128GB (disadvantages)
- Does not have wireless charging support.
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Sharp Aquos R3 (advantages)
- Best weight: 4 grams less (185 vs 189).
- Has a higher screen resolution: 3120x1440 vs 2400x1080.
- Have wireless charging supports.
Why it is better not to take Sharp Aquos R3 (disadvantages)
The advantages of both models
- NFC supports.
- Have water resistant supports.
- Have fast charging supports.
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Samsung Galaxy A53 5G 6/128GB related comparisons
- Compare Samsung Galaxy A52s vs Samsung Galaxy A53 5G
- Compare Samsung Galaxy S22 vs Samsung Galaxy A53 5G
- Compare Samsung Galaxy A53 5G vs Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
- Compare Samsung Galaxy A53 5G vs Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
- Compare Samsung Galaxy S20 FE vs Samsung Galaxy A53 5G
Sharp Aquos R3 related comparisons
- Compare Blackview BV9500 Pro vs Sharp Aquos R3
- Compare Blackview BV9600 Pro (Helio P60) vs Sharp Aquos R3
- Compare AGM X3 vs Sharp Aquos R3
- Compare Doogee S70 vs Sharp Aquos R3
- Compare Sharp Aquos R3 vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact