Compare Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra vs Motorola Moto G Fast
| Name | Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra | Motorola Moto G Fast |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Antutu benchmark | 511288 | 158799 |
| CPU | Samsung Exynos 990 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 |
| Diagonal size | 6.9 " | 6.4 " |
| Resolution | 3200x1440 | 1560x720 |
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 10 |
| RAM | 12 Gb | 3 Gb |
| Bezel-less | Yes | Yes |
| ROM | 128 GB | 32 GB |
| External memory | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb |
| Rear camera | 108 Mp | 16 Mp |
| Camera | Four cameras | Triple Camera |
| Sensor model | Samsung Bright S5KHM1 | |
| dxomark mobile ranking | ||
| dxomark (photo) | ||
| dxomark (video) | ||
| Front (selfie) camera | 10 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 4000 mAh |
| Wireless charging | Yes | No |
| Network | 4 G | 4 G |
| WiFi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS |
| Notifications Led | No | No |
| Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | Yes |
| Operating system (OS) | Android 10.0 (Q) | Android 10.0 (Q) |
| Material | Metal frame and glass case | Plastic |
| Weight | 222 g | 189 g |
| Dimensions | 166,9 x 76 x 8,8 mm | 161,9 x 75,7 x 9 mm |
| Price | 682.13€ ($698.99) See Details |
Notify me when it goes on sale.
View all Motorola models here
Alternatives to the Motorola Moto G Fast: Motorola Moto G42 4/128GB - Compare Motorola Moto X30 Pro 8/128GB - Compare Motorola Moto Razr 2022 8/256GB Global - Compare |
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra vs Motorola Moto G Fast: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra’s camera vs Motorola Moto G Fast’s camera, see the difference between the 108Mp Samsung Bright S5KHM1 sensor and the 16Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra | Motorola Moto G Fast |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 108 Mp | 16 Mp |
| Sensor model | Samsung Bright S5KHM1 | |
| Flash | Dual LED flash | Dual LED flash |
| Front (selfie) camera | 10 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Flash | No | No |
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra vs Motorola Moto G Fast: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra vs Motorola Moto G Fast, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra | Motorola Moto G Fast |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 4000 mAh |
| Type | Non-removable | Non-removable |
| Stand-by time | 6-7 days | 5-6 days |
| Battery Life | 3-4 days | 2-3 days |
| Working hours in hard mode | 8-9 hours | 8-9 hours |
| Talk time | 30 hours | 30 hours |
| Fast charging | Yes | Yes |
| Wireless charging | Yes | No |
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra vs Motorola Moto G Fast: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 511288 score points which is 221.97% faster than the Motorola Moto G Fast, which got 158799. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra vs Motorola Moto G Fast: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 490 points score in "Single-core" of against the Motorola Moto G Fast which got 313, it is 56.55% faster. In "Multi-core" score 2757 vs 1368 (101.54% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra and Motorola Moto G Fast? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 221.97% faster in the Antutu test (352489 score difference).
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 108Mp Samsung Bright S5KHM1 compared to 16Mp
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 10Mp vs 8Mp .
- NFC supports.
- Has a higher screen resolution: 3200x1440 vs 1560x720.
- More battery capacity: 5000mAh vs 4000mAh (a difference of 1000mAh).
- Have water resistant supports.
- Have wireless charging supports.
Why it is better not to take Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra (disadvantages)
- Does not have Headphone Jack. Need audio 3.5mm headphone jack adapter
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Motorola Moto G Fast (advantages)
- Best weight: 33 grams less (189 vs 222).
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Why it is better not to take Motorola Moto G Fast (disadvantages)
- Does not support NFC.
- Does not have water resistant supports.
- Does not have wireless charging support.
The advantages of both models
- Have fast charging supports.
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra related comparisons
- Compare Samsung Galaxy S22 vs Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
- Compare Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra vs Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra
- Compare Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra vs Samsung Galaxy A53 5G
- Compare OUKITEL K12 vs Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
- Compare Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra vs Samsung Galaxy A73 5G
Motorola Moto G Fast related comparisons
- Compare Motorola Moto G Fast vs Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
- Compare Motorola Moto G Fast vs Samsung Galaxy A02s
- Compare Motorola Moto G Fast vs Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
- Compare UMIDIGI One Max vs Motorola Moto G Fast
- Compare Motorola Moto G Fast vs Motorola Moto G10 Play