Compare Samsung Galaxy S9 vs YU FLY F9
Name | Samsung Galaxy S9 | YU FLY F9 |
---|---|---|
![]() |
![]() |
|
Antutu benchmark | 368733 | 69227 |
CPU | Samsung Exynos 9810 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 |
Diagonal size | 5.8 " | 6 " |
Resolution | 2960x1440 | 2560x1440 |
Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 10 |
RAM | 4 Gb | 4 Gb |
Bezel-less | Yes | No |
ROM | 64 GB | 64 GB |
External memory | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb |
Rear camera | 12 Mp | 16 Mp |
Camera | Single camera | Single camera |
Sensor model | ||
dxomark mobile ranking | ||
dxomark (photo) | ||
dxomark (video) | ||
Front (selfie) camera | 8 Mp | 16 Mp |
Battery | 3000 mAh | 4180 mAh |
Wireless charging | Yes | No |
Network | 4 G | 4 G |
WiFi | Yes | Yes |
Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
NFC | Yes | No |
Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS |
Notifications Led | No | Yes |
Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | Yes |
Operating system (OS) | Android 9.0 | Android 7.1 |
Material | Metal frame and glass case | Metal |
Weight | 163 g | 165 g |
Dimensions | 147,7 x 68,7 x 8,5 mm | 170 x 81 x 7.5 mm |
Price |
Discontinued.
View all Samsung models here
Alternatives to the Samsung Galaxy S9: Samsung Galaxy S20 FE 6/128GB - Compare Samsung Galaxy S23 FE - Compare Samsung Galaxy S10 8/512Gb - Compare |
Discontinued.
View all YU FLY models here
Alternatives to the YU FLY F9: |
Samsung Galaxy S9 vs YU FLY F9: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Samsung Galaxy S9’s camera vs YU FLY F9’s camera, see the difference between the 12Mp sensor and the 16Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
Name | Samsung Galaxy S9 | YU FLY F9 |
---|---|---|
Rear camera | 12 Mp | 16 Mp |
Sensor model | ||
Flash | Dual LED flash | Dual LED flash |
Front (selfie) camera | 8 Mp | 16 Mp |
Flash | No | No |
Samsung Galaxy S9 vs YU FLY F9: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Samsung Galaxy S9 vs YU FLY F9, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
Name | Samsung Galaxy S9 | YU FLY F9 |
---|---|---|
Battery | 3000 mAh | 4180 mAh |
Type | Non-removable | Non-removable |
Stand-by time | 5-6 days | 6-7 days |
Battery Life | 2-3 days | 2-3 days |
Working hours in hard mode | 6-7 hours | 7-8 hours |
Talk time | 30 hours | 25 hours |
Fast charging | Yes | Yes |
Wireless charging | Yes | No |
Samsung Galaxy S9 vs YU FLY F9: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Samsung Galaxy S9 in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 368733 score points which is 432.64% faster than the YU FLY F9, which got 69227. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Samsung Galaxy S9 vs YU FLY F9: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Samsung Galaxy S9 in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 678 points score in "Single-core" of against the YU FLY F9 which got 212, it is 219.81% faster. In "Multi-core" score 1991 vs 1051 (89.44% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Samsung Galaxy S9 and YU FLY F9? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Samsung Galaxy S9 (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 432.64% faster in the Antutu test (299506 score difference).
- Best weight: 2 grams less (163 vs 165).
- NFC supports.
- Has a higher screen resolution: 2960x1440 vs 2560x1440.
- Have water resistant supports.
- Have wireless charging supports.
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Why it is better not to take Samsung Galaxy S9 (disadvantages)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the YU FLY F9 (advantages)
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 16Mp compared to 12Mp
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 16Mp vs 8Mp .
- More battery capacity: 4180mAh vs 3000mAh (a difference of 1180mAh).
Why it is better not to take YU FLY F9 (disadvantages)
- Does not support NFC.
- Does not have water resistant supports.
- Does not have wireless charging support.
- Does not have Headphone Jack. Need audio 3.5mm headphone jack adapter
The advantages of both models
- Have fast charging supports.
Samsung Galaxy S9 related comparisons
- Compare Samsung Galaxy A53 5G vs Samsung Galaxy S9
- Compare Samsung Galaxy S9 vs Samsung Galaxy A14 5G
- Compare Samsung Galaxy S22 vs Samsung Galaxy S9
- Compare Samsung Galaxy S23 vs Samsung Galaxy S9
- Compare Samsung Galaxy S9 vs Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra
YU FLY F9 related comparisons
- Compare UMIDIGI A5 Pro vs YU FLY F9
- Compare Doogee N20 vs YU FLY F9
- Compare UMIDIGI F1 vs YU FLY F9
- Compare UMIDIGI Power vs YU FLY F9
- Compare Ulefone Armor 6E vs YU FLY F9