Compare Samsung Galaxy Z Fold2 vs IIIF150 B2021
| Name | Samsung Galaxy Z Fold2 | IIIF150 B2021 |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Antutu benchmark | 647884 | 102775 |
| CPU | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Plus | MediaTek Helio G25 |
| Diagonal size | 7.6 " | 5.86 " |
| Resolution | 2208x1768 | 1520x720 |
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 10 |
| RAM | 12 Gb | 6 Gb |
| Bezel-less | Yes | Yes |
| ROM | 256 GB | 64 GB |
| External memory | No | MicroSD (TF), support of card up to 2Tb |
| Rear camera | 12 Mp | 13 Mp |
| Camera | Triple Camera | Four cameras |
| Sensor model | Samsung S5K2LD | |
| dxomark mobile ranking | ||
| dxomark (photo) | ||
| dxomark (video) | ||
| Front (selfie) camera | 10 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Battery | 4365 mAh | 8000 mAh |
| Wireless charging | Yes | No |
| Network | 4 G | 4 G |
| WiFi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS |
| Notifications Led | No | No |
| Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | Yes |
| Operating system (OS) | Android 10.0 (Q) | Android 10.0 (Q) |
| Material | Metal frame and glass case | Plastic |
| Weight | 279 g | 315 g |
| Dimensions | 159,2 x 68 x 16,8 mm | 158 x 78 x 18 mm |
| Price | 860.71€ ($999.99) See Details | 118.56€ ($137.75) See Details |
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold2 vs IIIF150 B2021: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold2’s camera vs IIIF150 B2021’s camera, see the difference between the 12Mp Samsung S5K2LD sensor and the 13Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | Samsung Galaxy Z Fold2 | IIIF150 B2021 |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 12 Mp | 13 Mp |
| Sensor model | Samsung S5K2LD | |
| Flash | Dual LED flash | LED flash |
| Front (selfie) camera | 10 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Flash | No | No |
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold2 vs IIIF150 B2021: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold2 vs IIIF150 B2021, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | Samsung Galaxy Z Fold2 | IIIF150 B2021 |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 4365 mAh | 8000 mAh |
| Type | Non-removable | Non-removable |
| Stand-by time | 6-7 days | 8-9 days |
| Battery Life | 3-4 days | 3-4 days |
| Working hours in hard mode | 8-9 hours | 14-15 hours |
| Talk time | 30 hours | 30 hours |
| Fast charging | Yes | Yes |
| Wireless charging | Yes | No |
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold2 vs IIIF150 B2021: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold2 in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 647884 score points which is 530.39% faster than the IIIF150 B2021, which got 102775. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold2 vs IIIF150 B2021: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold2 in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 971 points score in "Single-core" of against the IIIF150 B2021 which got 172, it is 464.53% faster. In "Multi-core" score 3331 vs 967 (244.47% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Samsung Galaxy Z Fold2 and IIIF150 B2021? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold2 (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 530.39% faster in the Antutu test (545109 score difference).
- Best weight: 36 grams less (279 vs 315).
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 10Mp vs 8Mp .
- Has a higher screen resolution: 2208x1768 vs 1520x720.
- Have wireless charging supports.
Why it is better not to take Samsung Galaxy Z Fold2 (disadvantages)
- Does not have water resistant supports.
- Does not have Headphone Jack. Need audio 3.5mm headphone jack adapter
The main differences, why it is better to choose the IIIF150 B2021 (advantages)
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 13Mp compared to 12Mp Samsung S5K2LD
- More battery capacity: 8000mAh vs 4365mAh (a difference of 3635mAh).
- Have water resistant supports.
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Why it is better not to take IIIF150 B2021 (disadvantages)
- Does not have wireless charging support.
The advantages of both models
- NFC supports.
- Have fast charging supports.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold2 related comparisons
- Compare Samsung Galaxy Z Fold2 vs Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra
- Compare Samsung Galaxy Z Fold2 vs Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
- Compare Oppo X 2021 vs Samsung Galaxy Z Fold2
- Compare Samsung Galaxy Z Fold2 vs Samsung Galaxy A82
- Compare Samsung Galaxy S22 vs Samsung Galaxy Z Fold2
IIIF150 B2021 related comparisons
- Compare OUKITEL WP5 Pro vs F150 B2021
- Compare UMIDIGI Bison vs F150 B2021
- Compare F150 B2021 vs OUKITEL WP8 Pro
- Compare Doogee S59 Pro vs F150 B2021
- Compare OUKITEL WP5 vs F150 B2021