Compare Sharp Aquos R2 Compact vs Blackview BV6900
| Name | Sharp Aquos R2 Compact | Blackview BV6900 |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Antutu benchmark | 276448 | 94338 |
| CPU | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 | MediaTek MT6757 Pro / Helio P25 |
| Diagonal size | 5.2 " | 5.84 " |
| Resolution | 2280x1080 | 2280x1080 |
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 5 |
| RAM | 4 Gb | 4 Gb |
| Bezel-less | Yes | No |
| ROM | 64 GB | 64 GB |
| External memory | No | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb |
| Rear camera | 22.6 Mp | 16 Mp |
| Camera | Single camera | Four cameras |
| Sensor model | Samsung S5K3P9 | |
| dxomark mobile ranking | ||
| dxomark (photo) | ||
| dxomark (video) | ||
| Front (selfie) camera | 8 Mp | 16 Mp |
| Battery | 2500 mAh | 5580 mAh |
| Wireless charging | Yes | Yes |
| Network | 4 G | 4 G |
| WiFi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS |
| Notifications Led | Yes | Yes |
| Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | Yes |
| Operating system (OS) | Android 9.0 | Android 9.0 |
| Material | Metal | Plastics and rubber |
| Weight | 139 g | 284 g |
| Dimensions | 131 х 64 х 9,3 mm | 164.5 x 82.4 x 15 mm |
| Price | 349.68€ ($403.86) See Details | 109.99€ ($127.03) See Details |
Sharp Aquos R2 Compact vs Blackview BV6900: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Sharp Aquos R2 Compact’s camera vs Blackview BV6900’s camera, see the difference between the 22.6Mp sensor and the 16Mp Samsung S5K3P9 sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | Sharp Aquos R2 Compact | Blackview BV6900 |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 22.6 Mp | 16 Mp |
| Sensor model | Samsung S5K3P9 | |
| Flash | LED flash | Dual LED flash |
| Front (selfie) camera | 8 Mp | 16 Mp |
| Flash | No | No |
Sharp Aquos R2 Compact vs Blackview BV6900: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Sharp Aquos R2 Compact vs Blackview BV6900, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | Sharp Aquos R2 Compact | Blackview BV6900 |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 2500 mAh | 5580 mAh |
| Type | Non-removable | Non-removable |
| Stand-by time | 5-6 days | 6-7 days |
| Battery Life | 2-3 days | 3-4 days |
| Working hours in hard mode | 5-6 hours | 10-12 hours |
| Talk time | 25 hours | 30 hours |
| Fast charging | Yes | Yes |
| Wireless charging | Yes | Yes |
Sharp Aquos R2 Compact vs Blackview BV6900: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Sharp Aquos R2 Compact in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 276448 score points which is 193.04% faster than the Blackview BV6900, which got 94338. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Sharp Aquos R2 Compact vs Blackview BV6900: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Sharp Aquos R2 Compact in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 501 points score in "Single-core" of against the Blackview BV6900 which got 178, it is 181.46% faster. In "Multi-core" score 1986 vs 871 (128.01% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Sharp Aquos R2 Compact and Blackview BV6900? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Sharp Aquos R2 Compact (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 193.04% faster in the Antutu test (182110 score difference).
- Best weight: 145 grams less (139 vs 284).
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 22.6Mp compared to 16Mp Samsung S5K3P9
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Why it is better not to take Sharp Aquos R2 Compact (disadvantages)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Blackview BV6900 (advantages)
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 16Mp vs 8Mp .
- More battery capacity: 5580mAh vs 2500mAh (a difference of 3080mAh).
Why it is better not to take Blackview BV6900 (disadvantages)
- Does not have Headphone Jack. Need audio 3.5mm headphone jack adapter
The advantages of both models
- NFC supports.
- Have water resistant supports.
- Have wireless charging supports.
- Have fast charging supports.
Sharp Aquos R2 Compact related comparisons
- Compare AGM A8 vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact
- Compare Nomu M8 vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact
- Compare Nomu S50 Pro vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact
- Compare Sharp Aquos R3 vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact
- Compare Sharp AQUOS S2 vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact
Blackview BV6900 related comparisons
- Compare Blackview BV9600E vs Blackview BV6900
- Compare Blackview BV9600 vs Blackview BV6900
- Compare OUKITEL K12 vs Blackview BV6900
- Compare Doogee S90C vs Blackview BV6900
- Compare HT F801C vs Blackview BV6900