Compare Sharp Aquos R2 Compact vs Cubot King Kong CS
Name | Sharp Aquos R2 Compact | Cubot King Kong CS |
---|---|---|
![]() |
![]() |
|
Antutu benchmark | 276448 | 21244 |
CPU | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 | MediaTek MT6580 |
Diagonal size | 5.2 " | 5 " |
Resolution | 2280x1080 | 1280x720 |
Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 5 |
RAM | 4 Gb | 2 Gb |
Bezel-less | Yes | No |
ROM | 64 GB | 16 GB |
External memory | No | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 64Gb |
Rear camera | 22.6 Mp | 8 Mp |
Camera | Single camera | Single camera |
Sensor model | ||
dxomark mobile ranking | ||
dxomark (photo) | ||
dxomark (video) | ||
Front (selfie) camera | 8 Mp | 5 Mp |
Battery | 2500 mAh | 4400 mAh |
Wireless charging | Yes | No |
Network | 4 G | 3 G |
WiFi | Yes | Yes |
Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
NFC | Yes | No |
Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS |
Notifications Led | Yes | Yes |
Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | No |
Operating system (OS) | Android 9.0 | Android 10.0 (Q) |
Material | Metal | Plastic |
Weight | 139 g | 220 g |
Dimensions | 131 х 64 х 9,3 mm | 154 x 79,2 x 11,2 mm |
Price | 350.05€ ($405.71) See Details |
Discontinued.
View all Cubot models here
Alternatives to the Cubot King Kong CS: Cubot King Kong - Compare Cubot KingKong Mini 3 - Compare Cubot J5 - Compare |
Sharp Aquos R2 Compact vs Cubot King Kong CS: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Sharp Aquos R2 Compact’s camera vs Cubot King Kong CS’s camera, see the difference between the 22.6Mp sensor and the 8Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
Name | Sharp Aquos R2 Compact | Cubot King Kong CS |
---|---|---|
Rear camera | 22.6 Mp | 8 Mp |
Sensor model | ||
Flash | LED flash | Dual LED flash |
Front (selfie) camera | 8 Mp | 5 Mp |
Flash | No | No |
Sharp Aquos R2 Compact vs Cubot King Kong CS: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Sharp Aquos R2 Compact vs Cubot King Kong CS, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
Name | Sharp Aquos R2 Compact | Cubot King Kong CS |
---|---|---|
Battery | 2500 mAh | 4400 mAh |
Type | Non-removable | Non-removable |
Stand-by time | 5-6 days | 6-7 days |
Battery Life | 2-3 days | 3-4 days |
Working hours in hard mode | 5-6 hours | 10-12 hours |
Talk time | 25 hours | 30 hours |
Fast charging | Yes | No |
Wireless charging | Yes | No |
Sharp Aquos R2 Compact vs Cubot King Kong CS: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Sharp Aquos R2 Compact in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 276448 score points which is 1201.30% faster than the Cubot King Kong CS, which got 21244. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Sharp Aquos R2 Compact vs Cubot King Kong CS: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Sharp Aquos R2 Compact in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 501 points score in "Single-core" of against the Cubot King Kong CS which got 60, it is 735.00% faster. In "Multi-core" score 1986 vs 249 (697.59% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Sharp Aquos R2 Compact and Cubot King Kong CS? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Sharp Aquos R2 Compact (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 1201.30% faster in the Antutu test (255204 score difference).
- Best weight: 81 grams less (139 vs 220).
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 22.6Mp compared to 8Mp
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 8Mp vs 5Mp .
- NFC supports.
- Has a higher screen resolution: 2280x1080 vs 1280x720.
- Have wireless charging supports.
- Have fast charging supports.
Why it is better not to take Sharp Aquos R2 Compact (disadvantages)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Cubot King Kong CS (advantages)
- More battery capacity: 4400mAh vs 2500mAh (a difference of 1900mAh).
Why it is better not to take Cubot King Kong CS (disadvantages)
- Does not support NFC.
- Does not have wireless charging support.
- Does not have fast charging support
The advantages of both models
- Have water resistant supports.
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Sharp Aquos R2 Compact related comparisons
- Compare AGM A8 vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact
- Compare Nomu M8 vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact
- Compare Nomu S50 Pro vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact
- Compare Sharp Aquos R3 vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact
- Compare Sharp AQUOS S2 vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact
Cubot King Kong CS related comparisons
- Compare Cubot King Kong vs Cubot King Kong CS
- Compare OUKITEL K12 vs Cubot King Kong CS
- Compare HT F801C vs Cubot King Kong CS
- Compare Ulefone Armor X6 vs Cubot King Kong CS
- Compare Zopo zp700 vs Cubot King Kong CS