Compare Sharp Aquos R2 Compact vs Motorola Moto G Pro
| Name | Sharp Aquos R2 Compact | Motorola Moto G Pro |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Antutu benchmark | 276448 | 151778 |
| CPU | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 |
| Diagonal size | 5.2 " | 6.4 " |
| Resolution | 2280x1080 | 2300x1080 |
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 10 |
| RAM | 4 Gb | 4 Gb |
| Bezel-less | Yes | Yes |
| ROM | 64 GB | 128 GB |
| External memory | No | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb |
| Rear camera | 22.6 Mp | 48 Mp |
| Camera | Single camera | Four cameras |
| Sensor model | ||
| dxomark mobile ranking | ||
| dxomark (photo) | ||
| dxomark (video) | ||
| Front (selfie) camera | 8 Mp | 20 Mp |
| Battery | 2500 mAh | 4000 mAh |
| Wireless charging | Yes | No |
| Network | 4 G | 4 G |
| WiFi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS |
| Notifications Led | Yes | No |
| Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | Yes |
| Operating system (OS) | Android 9.0 | Android 10.0 (Q) |
| Material | Metal | Plastic |
| Weight | 139 g | 192 g |
| Dimensions | 131 х 64 х 9,3 mm | 158.6 x 75.8 x 9.2 mm |
| Price | 363.28€ ($377.70) See Details | 196.00€ ($203.78) See Details |
Sharp Aquos R2 Compact vs Motorola Moto G Pro: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Sharp Aquos R2 Compact’s camera vs Motorola Moto G Pro’s camera, see the difference between the 22.6Mp sensor and the 48Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | Sharp Aquos R2 Compact | Motorola Moto G Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 22.6 Mp | 48 Mp |
| Sensor model | ||
| Flash | LED flash | Dual LED flash |
| Front (selfie) camera | 8 Mp | 20 Mp |
| Flash | No | Double LED |
Sharp Aquos R2 Compact vs Motorola Moto G Pro: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Sharp Aquos R2 Compact vs Motorola Moto G Pro, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | Sharp Aquos R2 Compact | Motorola Moto G Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 2500 mAh | 4000 mAh |
| Type | Non-removable | Non-removable |
| Stand-by time | 5-6 days | 6-7 days |
| Battery Life | 2-3 days | 2-3 days |
| Working hours in hard mode | 5-6 hours | 8-9 hours |
| Talk time | 25 hours | 25 hours |
| Fast charging | Yes | Yes |
| Wireless charging | Yes | No |
Sharp Aquos R2 Compact vs Motorola Moto G Pro: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Sharp Aquos R2 Compact in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 276448 score points which is 82.14% faster than the Motorola Moto G Pro, which got 151778. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Sharp Aquos R2 Compact vs Motorola Moto G Pro: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Sharp Aquos R2 Compact in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 501 points score in "Single-core" of against the Motorola Moto G Pro which got 314, it is 59.55% faster. In "Multi-core" score 1986 vs 1393 (42.57% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Sharp Aquos R2 Compact and Motorola Moto G Pro? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Sharp Aquos R2 Compact (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 82.14% faster in the Antutu test (124670 score difference).
- Best weight: 53 grams less (139 vs 192).
- Have water resistant supports.
- Have wireless charging supports.
Why it is better not to take Sharp Aquos R2 Compact (disadvantages)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Motorola Moto G Pro (advantages)
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 48Mp compared to 22.6Mp
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 20Mp vs 8Mp .
- Has a higher screen resolution: 2300x1080 vs 2280x1080.
- More battery capacity: 4000mAh vs 2500mAh (a difference of 1500mAh).
Why it is better not to take Motorola Moto G Pro (disadvantages)
- Does not have water resistant supports.
- Does not have wireless charging support.
The advantages of both models
- NFC supports.
- Have fast charging supports.
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Sharp Aquos R2 Compact related comparisons
- Compare AGM A8 vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact
- Compare Nomu M8 vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact
- Compare Nomu S50 Pro vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact
- Compare Sharp Aquos R3 vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact
- Compare Sharp AQUOS S2 vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact
Motorola Moto G Pro related comparisons
- Compare Motorola Moto G30 vs Motorola Moto G Pro
- Compare Motorola Moto G Pro vs Motorola Moto G10
- Compare Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro vs Motorola Moto G Pro
- Compare Motorola Moto G Pro vs Motorola Moto G10 Play
- Compare Motorola Edge S vs Motorola Moto G Pro