Compare Motorola Moto Nio vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact
| Name | Motorola Moto Nio | Sharp Aquos R2 Compact |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Antutu benchmark | 643266 | 276448 |
| CPU | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 |
| Diagonal size | 6.6 " | 5.2 " |
| Resolution | 2520x1080 | 2280x1080 |
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 10 |
| RAM | 12 Gb | 4 Gb |
| Bezel-less | Yes | Yes |
| ROM | 256 GB | 64 GB |
| External memory | No | No |
| Rear camera | 64 Mp | 22.6 Mp |
| Camera | Triple Camera | Single camera |
| Sensor model | OmniVision OV64B | |
| dxomark mobile ranking | ||
| dxomark (photo) | ||
| dxomark (video) | ||
| Front (selfie) camera | 16 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Battery | 4500 mAh | 2500 mAh |
| Wireless charging | No | Yes |
| Network | 5 G | 4 G |
| WiFi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS |
| Notifications Led | No | Yes |
| Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | Yes |
| Operating system (OS) | Android 11 | Android 9.0 |
| Material | Metal frame and glass case | Metal |
| Weight | g | 139 g |
| Dimensions | mm | 131 х 64 х 9,3 mm |
| Price |
Notify me when it goes on sale.
View all Motorola models here
Alternatives to the Motorola Moto Nio: Motorola Moto G82 5G - Compare Motorola Edge S 6/128Gb - Compare Motorola Moto G8 Play - Compare |
349.68€ ($403.86) See Details |
Motorola Moto Nio vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Motorola Moto Nio’s camera vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact’s camera, see the difference between the 64Mp OmniVision OV64B sensor and the 22.6Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | Motorola Moto Nio | Sharp Aquos R2 Compact |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 64 Mp | 22.6 Mp |
| Sensor model | OmniVision OV64B | |
| Flash | Dual LED flash | LED flash |
| Front (selfie) camera | 16 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Flash | No | No |
Motorola Moto Nio vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Motorola Moto Nio vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | Motorola Moto Nio | Sharp Aquos R2 Compact |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 4500 mAh | 2500 mAh |
| Type | Non-removable | Non-removable |
| Stand-by time | 6-7 days | 5-6 days |
| Battery Life | 3-4 days | 2-3 days |
| Working hours in hard mode | 8-9 hours | 5-6 hours |
| Talk time | 30 hours | 25 hours |
| Fast charging | Yes | Yes |
| Wireless charging | No | Yes |
Motorola Moto Nio vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Motorola Moto Nio in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 643266 score points which is 132.69% faster than the Sharp Aquos R2 Compact, which got 276448. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Motorola Moto Nio vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Motorola Moto Nio in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 93 points score in "Single-core" of against the Sharp Aquos R2 Compact which got 501, it is -81.44% faster. In "Multi-core" score 3613 vs 1986 (81.92% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Motorola Moto Nio and Sharp Aquos R2 Compact? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Motorola Moto Nio (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 132.69% faster in the Antutu test (366818 score difference).
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 64Mp OmniVision OV64B compared to 22.6Mp
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 16Mp vs 8Mp .
- Has a higher screen resolution: 2520x1080 vs 2280x1080.
- More battery capacity: 4500mAh vs 2500mAh (a difference of 2000mAh).
- Have infrared blaster supports.
Why it is better not to take Motorola Moto Nio (disadvantages)
- Does not have water resistant supports.
- Does not have wireless charging support.
- Does not have Headphone Jack. Need audio 3.5mm headphone jack adapter
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Sharp Aquos R2 Compact (advantages)
- Have water resistant supports.
- Have wireless charging supports.
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Why it is better not to take Sharp Aquos R2 Compact (disadvantages)
- Does not have infrared blaster supports.
The advantages of both models
- NFC supports.
- Have fast charging supports.
Motorola Moto Nio related comparisons
- Compare Motorola Moto Nio vs Motorola One Action
- Compare Motorola Moto Nio vs Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
- Compare Motorola Moto Nio vs Motorola Moto G9 Plus
- Compare Motorola Moto Nio vs Motorola One Vision
- Compare Motorola Moto Nio vs Motorola One Vision Plus
Sharp Aquos R2 Compact related comparisons
- Compare AGM A8 vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact
- Compare Nomu M8 vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact
- Compare Nomu S50 Pro vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact
- Compare Sharp Aquos R3 vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact
- Compare Sharp AQUOS S2 vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact