Compare Sharp Aquos R2 Compact vs OUKITEL C13 Pro
| Name | Sharp Aquos R2 Compact | OUKITEL C13 Pro |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Antutu benchmark | 276448 | 33428 |
| CPU | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 | MediaTek MT6739 |
| Diagonal size | 5.2 " | 6.18 " |
| Resolution | 2280x1080 | 960x480 |
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 5 |
| RAM | 4 Gb | 2 Gb |
| Bezel-less | Yes | Yes |
| ROM | 64 GB | 16 GB |
| External memory | No | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 64Gb |
| Rear camera | 22.6 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Camera | Single camera | Dual Camera |
| Sensor model | ||
| dxomark mobile ranking | ||
| dxomark (photo) | ||
| dxomark (video) | ||
| Front (selfie) camera | 8 Mp | 5 Mp |
| Battery | 2500 mAh | 3000 mAh |
| Wireless charging | Yes | No |
| Network | 4 G | 4 G |
| WiFi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS |
| Notifications Led | Yes | No |
| Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | Yes |
| Operating system (OS) | Android 9.0 | Android 9.0 |
| Material | Metal | Plastic |
| Weight | 139 g | 164 g |
| Dimensions | 131 х 64 х 9,3 mm | 155.5 x 76 x 8.3 mm |
| Price | 350.05€ ($405.71) See Details |
Discontinued.
View all OUKITEL models here
Alternatives to the OUKITEL C13 Pro: OUKITEL WP15 S - Compare OUKITEL WP2 - Compare OUKITEL Y1000 - Compare |
Sharp Aquos R2 Compact vs OUKITEL C13 Pro: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Sharp Aquos R2 Compact’s camera vs OUKITEL C13 Pro’s camera, see the difference between the 22.6Mp sensor and the 8Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | Sharp Aquos R2 Compact | OUKITEL C13 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 22.6 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Sensor model | ||
| Flash | LED flash | LED flash |
| Front (selfie) camera | 8 Mp | 5 Mp |
| Flash | No | No |
Sharp Aquos R2 Compact vs OUKITEL C13 Pro: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Sharp Aquos R2 Compact vs OUKITEL C13 Pro, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | Sharp Aquos R2 Compact | OUKITEL C13 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 2500 mAh | 3000 mAh |
| Type | Non-removable | Non-removable |
| Stand-by time | 5-6 days | 5-6 days |
| Battery Life | 2-3 days | 2-3 days |
| Working hours in hard mode | 5-6 hours | 5-6 hours |
| Talk time | 25 hours | 20 hours |
| Fast charging | Yes | No |
| Wireless charging | Yes | No |
Sharp Aquos R2 Compact vs OUKITEL C13 Pro: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Sharp Aquos R2 Compact in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 276448 score points which is 727.00% faster than the OUKITEL C13 Pro, which got 33428. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Sharp Aquos R2 Compact vs OUKITEL C13 Pro: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Sharp Aquos R2 Compact in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 501 points score in "Single-core" of against the OUKITEL C13 Pro which got 150, it is 234.00% faster. In "Multi-core" score 1986 vs 370 (436.76% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Sharp Aquos R2 Compact and OUKITEL C13 Pro? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Sharp Aquos R2 Compact (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 727.00% faster in the Antutu test (243020 score difference).
- Best weight: 25 grams less (139 vs 164).
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 22.6Mp compared to 8Mp
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 8Mp vs 5Mp .
- NFC supports.
- Has a higher screen resolution: 2280x1080 vs 960x480.
- Have water resistant supports.
- Have wireless charging supports.
- Have fast charging supports.
Why it is better not to take Sharp Aquos R2 Compact (disadvantages)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the OUKITEL C13 Pro (advantages)
- More battery capacity: 3000mAh vs 2500mAh (a difference of 500mAh).
Why it is better not to take OUKITEL C13 Pro (disadvantages)
- Does not support NFC.
- Does not have water resistant supports.
- Does not have wireless charging support.
- Does not have fast charging support
The advantages of both models
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Sharp Aquos R2 Compact related comparisons
- Compare AGM A8 vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact
- Compare Nomu M8 vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact
- Compare Nomu S50 Pro vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact
- Compare Sharp Aquos R3 vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact
- Compare Sharp AQUOS S2 vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact
OUKITEL C13 Pro related comparisons
- Compare Doogee Y8 vs OUKITEL C13 Pro
- Compare OUKITEL C15 Pro vs OUKITEL C13 Pro
- Compare OUKITEL C12 Pro vs OUKITEL C13 Pro
- Compare UMIDIGI A3 Pro vs OUKITEL C13 Pro
- Compare Leagoo Power 2 Pro vs OUKITEL C13 Pro