Compare Sharp Aquos R2 Compact vs OUKITEL C17
| Name | Sharp Aquos R2 Compact | OUKITEL C17 |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Antutu benchmark | 276448 | 82177 |
| CPU | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 | MediaTek Helio P23 |
| Diagonal size | 5.2 " | 6.35 " |
| Resolution | 2280x1080 | 1560x720 |
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 5 |
| RAM | 4 Gb | 3 Gb |
| Bezel-less | Yes | Yes |
| ROM | 64 GB | 16 GB |
| External memory | No | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 128Gb |
| Rear camera | 22.6 Mp | 13 Mp |
| Camera | Single camera | Triple Camera |
| Sensor model | ||
| dxomark mobile ranking | ||
| dxomark (photo) | ||
| dxomark (video) | ||
| Front (selfie) camera | 8 Mp | 5 Mp |
| Battery | 2500 mAh | 3900 mAh |
| Wireless charging | Yes | No |
| Network | 4 G | 4 G |
| WiFi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS |
| Notifications Led | Yes | No |
| Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | Yes |
| Operating system (OS) | Android 9.0 | Android 9.0 |
| Material | Metal | Plastic |
| Weight | 139 g | 193 g |
| Dimensions | 131 х 64 х 9,3 mm | 158 x 75.3 x 8.8 mm |
| Price | 350.05€ ($405.71) See Details |
Discontinued.
View all OUKITEL models here
Alternatives to the OUKITEL C17: OUKITEL WP5 3/32Gb - Compare OUKITEL WP17 - Compare OUKITEL WP30 Pro - Compare |
Sharp Aquos R2 Compact vs OUKITEL C17: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Sharp Aquos R2 Compact’s camera vs OUKITEL C17’s camera, see the difference between the 22.6Mp sensor and the 13Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | Sharp Aquos R2 Compact | OUKITEL C17 |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 22.6 Mp | 13 Mp |
| Sensor model | ||
| Flash | LED flash | Dual LED flash |
| Front (selfie) camera | 8 Mp | 5 Mp |
| Flash | No | No |
Sharp Aquos R2 Compact vs OUKITEL C17: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Sharp Aquos R2 Compact vs OUKITEL C17, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | Sharp Aquos R2 Compact | OUKITEL C17 |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 2500 mAh | 3900 mAh |
| Type | Non-removable | Non-removable |
| Stand-by time | 5-6 days | 6-7 days |
| Battery Life | 2-3 days | 2-3 days |
| Working hours in hard mode | 5-6 hours | 8-9 hours |
| Talk time | 25 hours | 30 hours |
| Fast charging | Yes | No |
| Wireless charging | Yes | No |
Sharp Aquos R2 Compact vs OUKITEL C17: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Sharp Aquos R2 Compact in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 276448 score points which is 236.41% faster than the OUKITEL C17, which got 82177. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Sharp Aquos R2 Compact vs OUKITEL C17: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Sharp Aquos R2 Compact in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 501 points score in "Single-core" of against the OUKITEL C17 which got 156, it is 221.15% faster. In "Multi-core" score 1986 vs 875 (126.97% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Sharp Aquos R2 Compact and OUKITEL C17? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Sharp Aquos R2 Compact (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 236.41% faster in the Antutu test (194271 score difference).
- Best weight: 54 grams less (139 vs 193).
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 22.6Mp compared to 13Mp
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 8Mp vs 5Mp .
- NFC supports.
- Has a higher screen resolution: 2280x1080 vs 1560x720.
- Have water resistant supports.
- Have wireless charging supports.
- Have fast charging supports.
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Why it is better not to take Sharp Aquos R2 Compact (disadvantages)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the OUKITEL C17 (advantages)
- More battery capacity: 3900mAh vs 2500mAh (a difference of 1400mAh).
Why it is better not to take OUKITEL C17 (disadvantages)
- Does not support NFC.
- Does not have water resistant supports.
- Does not have wireless charging support.
- Does not have fast charging support
- Does not have Headphone Jack. Need audio 3.5mm headphone jack adapter
The advantages of both models
Sharp Aquos R2 Compact related comparisons
- Compare AGM A8 vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact
- Compare Nomu M8 vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact
- Compare Nomu S50 Pro vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact
- Compare Sharp Aquos R3 vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact
- Compare Sharp AQUOS S2 vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact
OUKITEL C17 related comparisons
- Compare UMIDIGI A5 Pro vs OUKITEL C17
- Compare OUKITEL C17 vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Global
- Compare Ulefone Power 3s vs OUKITEL C17
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi 8A vs OUKITEL C17
- Compare OUKITEL C17 Pro vs OUKITEL C17