Compare Sharp Aquos R2 Compact vs OUKITEL C17 Pro
| Name | Sharp Aquos R2 Compact | OUKITEL C17 Pro |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Antutu benchmark | 276448 | 91277 |
| CPU | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 | MediaTek Helio P23 |
| Diagonal size | 5.2 " | 6.35 " |
| Resolution | 2280x1080 | 1560x720 |
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 5 |
| RAM | 4 Gb | 4 Gb |
| Bezel-less | Yes | Yes |
| ROM | 64 GB | 64 GB |
| External memory | No | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 128Gb |
| Rear camera | 22.6 Mp | 13 Mp |
| Camera | Single camera | Triple Camera |
| Sensor model | ||
| dxomark mobile ranking | ||
| dxomark (photo) | ||
| dxomark (video) | ||
| Front (selfie) camera | 8 Mp | 5 Mp |
| Battery | 2500 mAh | 3900 mAh |
| Wireless charging | Yes | No |
| Network | 4 G | 4 G |
| WiFi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS |
| Notifications Led | Yes | No |
| Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | Yes |
| Operating system (OS) | Android 9.0 | Android 9.0 |
| Material | Metal | Plastic |
| Weight | 139 g | 193 g |
| Dimensions | 131 х 64 х 9,3 mm | 158 x 75.3 x 8.8 mm |
| Price | 350.05€ ($405.71) See Details | 90.22€ ($104.56) See Details |
Sharp Aquos R2 Compact vs OUKITEL C17 Pro: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Sharp Aquos R2 Compact’s camera vs OUKITEL C17 Pro’s camera, see the difference between the 22.6Mp sensor and the 13Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | Sharp Aquos R2 Compact | OUKITEL C17 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 22.6 Mp | 13 Mp |
| Sensor model | ||
| Flash | LED flash | Dual LED flash |
| Front (selfie) camera | 8 Mp | 5 Mp |
| Flash | No | No |
Sharp Aquos R2 Compact vs OUKITEL C17 Pro: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Sharp Aquos R2 Compact vs OUKITEL C17 Pro, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | Sharp Aquos R2 Compact | OUKITEL C17 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 2500 mAh | 3900 mAh |
| Type | Non-removable | Non-removable |
| Stand-by time | 5-6 days | 6-7 days |
| Battery Life | 2-3 days | 2-3 days |
| Working hours in hard mode | 5-6 hours | 8-9 hours |
| Talk time | 25 hours | 30 hours |
| Fast charging | Yes | No |
| Wireless charging | Yes | No |
Sharp Aquos R2 Compact vs OUKITEL C17 Pro: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Sharp Aquos R2 Compact in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 276448 score points which is 202.87% faster than the OUKITEL C17 Pro, which got 91277. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Sharp Aquos R2 Compact vs OUKITEL C17 Pro: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Sharp Aquos R2 Compact in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 501 points score in "Single-core" of against the OUKITEL C17 Pro which got 156, it is 221.15% faster. In "Multi-core" score 1986 vs 875 (126.97% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Sharp Aquos R2 Compact and OUKITEL C17 Pro? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Sharp Aquos R2 Compact (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 202.87% faster in the Antutu test (185171 score difference).
- Best weight: 54 grams less (139 vs 193).
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 22.6Mp compared to 13Mp
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 8Mp vs 5Mp .
- NFC supports.
- Has a higher screen resolution: 2280x1080 vs 1560x720.
- Have water resistant supports.
- Have wireless charging supports.
- Have fast charging supports.
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Why it is better not to take Sharp Aquos R2 Compact (disadvantages)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the OUKITEL C17 Pro (advantages)
- More battery capacity: 3900mAh vs 2500mAh (a difference of 1400mAh).
Why it is better not to take OUKITEL C17 Pro (disadvantages)
- Does not support NFC.
- Does not have water resistant supports.
- Does not have wireless charging support.
- Does not have fast charging support
- Does not have Headphone Jack. Need audio 3.5mm headphone jack adapter
The advantages of both models
Sharp Aquos R2 Compact related comparisons
- Compare AGM A8 vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact
- Compare Nomu M8 vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact
- Compare Nomu S50 Pro vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact
- Compare Sharp Aquos R3 vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact
- Compare Sharp AQUOS S2 vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact
OUKITEL C17 Pro related comparisons
- Compare OUKITEL C17 Pro vs UMIDIGI A5 Pro
- Compare OUKITEL C17 Pro vs Doogee N20
- Compare OUKITEL C17 Pro vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Global
- Compare OUKITEL C17 Pro vs Xiaomi Redmi 8A
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi 7 Global vs OUKITEL C17 Pro