0
Compare:
Compare with:
Please enter model name or part of it
 
AED درهم BHD دب BRL R$ CNY ¥ CZK Kč DKK kr EUR € GBP £ IDR Rp ILS ₪ INR ₹ JPY ¥ KRW ₩ KWD د.ك NOK kr PLN zł QAR ريال RUB руб SAR SAR SEK kr TRY ₺ UAH грн
You were probably searching for:
Reviews

Compare Oppo Reno 3 vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact

Oppo Reno 3 vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact Comparison - Compare Size, Cameras, Specs, Features, Price of Oppo Reno 3 with Sharp Aquos R2 Compact.

Name Oppo Reno 3 Sharp Aquos R2 Compact
Oppo Reno 3 Sharp Aquos R2 Compact
Antutu benchmark 502188 276448
CPU MediaTek Dimensity 1000 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
Diagonal size 6.4 " 5.2 "
Resolution 2400x1080 2280x1080
Multi-touch (number of touches) 10 10
RAM 12 Gb 4 Gb
Bezel-less Yes Yes
ROM 128 GB 64 GB
External memory No No
Rear camera 64 Mp 22.6 Mp
Camera Four cameras Single camera
Sensor model Sony IMX686
dxomark mobile ranking
dxomark (photo)
dxomark (video)
Front (selfie) camera 32 Mp 8 Mp
Battery 4035 mAh 2500 mAh
Wireless charging No Yes
Network 5 G 4 G
WiFi Yes Yes
Bluetooth Yes Yes
NFC Yes Yes
Navigation (Positioning) GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS
Notifications Led Yes Yes
Fingerprint's scanner Yes Yes
Operating system (OS) Android 10.0 (Q) Android 9.0
Material Metal frame and glass case Metal
Weight 181 g 139 g
Dimensions 160.3 x 74.3 x 7.96 mm 131 х 64 х 9,3 mm
  Price 209.25€ ($242.52) See Details 350.05€ ($405.71) See Details

Oppo Reno 3 vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact: Camera comparison.

In this table, you can compare the Oppo Reno 3’s camera vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact’s camera, see the difference between the 64Mp Sony IMX686 sensor and the 22.6Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.

Name Oppo Reno 3 Sharp Aquos R2 Compact
Rear camera 64 Mp 22.6 Mp
Sensor model Sony IMX686
Flash Dual LED flash LED flash
Front (selfie) camera 32 Mp 8 Mp
Flash No No

Oppo Reno 3 vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact: battery life comparison.

Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Oppo Reno 3 vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.

Name Oppo Reno 3 Sharp Aquos R2 Compact
Battery 4035 mAh 2500 mAh
Type Non-removable Non-removable
Stand-by time 6-7 days 5-6 days
Battery Life 3-4 days 2-3 days
Working hours in hard mode 8-9 hours 5-6 hours
Talk time 30 hours 25 hours
Fast charging Yes Yes
Wireless charging No Yes

Oppo Reno 3 vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact: Antutu benchmark comparison. Oppo Reno 3 vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact: Antutu benchmark comparison.

Oppo Reno 3 in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 502188 score points which is 81.66% faster than the Sharp Aquos R2 Compact, which got 276448. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.

Oppo Reno 3
6.4" (2400x1080) Gorilla glass / Dimensity 1000 / 12Gb / 128GB / 64Mp Sony IMX686 / 4035mAh
209.25€
$242.52
 
Sharp Aquos R2 Compact
5.2" (2280x1080) Curved Glass / Snapdragon 845 / 4Gb / 64GB / 22.6Mp / 2500mAh
350.05€
$405.71
 

Oppo Reno 3 vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact: Geekbench benchmark comparison.

Oppo Reno 3 in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 785 points score in "Single-core" of against the Sharp Aquos R2 Compact which got 501, it is 56.69% faster. In "Multi-core" score 3023 vs 1986 (52.22% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.

Oppo Reno 3
6.4" (2400x1080) Gorilla glass / Dimensity 1000 / 12Gb / 128GB / 64Mp Sony IMX686 / 4035mAh
209.25€
$242.52
 
Sharp Aquos R2 Compact
5.2" (2280x1080) Curved Glass / Snapdragon 845 / 4Gb / 64GB / 22.6Mp / 2500mAh
350.05€
$405.71
 

What is the difference between Oppo Reno 3 and Sharp Aquos R2 Compact? (compare specs) (which is better)

The main differences, why it is better to choose the Oppo Reno 3 (advantages)

  • Good performance: Is 81.66% faster in the Antutu test (225740 score difference).
  • Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 64Mp Sony IMX686 compared to 22.6Mp
  • Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 32Mp vs 8Mp .
  • Has a higher screen resolution: 2400x1080 vs 2280x1080.
  • More battery capacity: 4035mAh vs 2500mAh (a difference of 1535mAh).

Why it is better not to take Oppo Reno 3 (disadvantages)

  • Does not have water resistant supports.
  • Does not have wireless charging support.

The main differences, why it is better to choose the Sharp Aquos R2 Compact (advantages)

  • Best weight: 42 grams less (139 vs 181).
  • Have water resistant supports.
  • Have wireless charging supports.

Why it is better not to take Sharp Aquos R2 Compact (disadvantages)

The advantages of both models

  • NFC supports.
  • Have fast charging supports.
  • Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.

Oppo Reno 3 related comparisons

Sharp Aquos R2 Compact related comparisons

Rate this page: 1-5
4.69/5 of 16
Frequent comparisons