Compare Samsung Galaxy A90 5G vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact
| Name | Samsung Galaxy A90 5G | Sharp Aquos R2 Compact |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Antutu benchmark | 432666 | 276448 |
| CPU | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 |
| Diagonal size | 6.7 " | 5.2 " |
| Resolution | 2400x1080 | 2280x1080 |
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 10 |
| RAM | 8 Gb | 4 Gb |
| Bezel-less | Yes | Yes |
| ROM | 128 GB | 64 GB |
| External memory | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb | No |
| Rear camera | 48 Mp | 22.6 Mp |
| Camera | Triple Camera | Single camera |
| Sensor model | Samsung GM1 | |
| dxomark mobile ranking | ||
| dxomark (photo) | ||
| dxomark (video) | ||
| Front (selfie) camera | 32 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Battery | 4500 mAh | 2500 mAh |
| Wireless charging | No | Yes |
| Network | 5 G | 4 G |
| WiFi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS |
| Notifications Led | No | Yes |
| Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | Yes |
| Operating system (OS) | Android 9.0 | Android 9.0 |
| Material | Plastic frame and glass case | Metal |
| Weight | 206 g | 139 g |
| Dimensions | 164,8 x 76,4 x 8,4 mm | 131 х 64 х 9,3 mm |
| Price |
Notify me when it goes on sale.
View all Samsung models here
Alternatives to the Samsung Galaxy A90 5G: Samsung Galaxy A01 - Compare Samsung Galaxy A30S 3/32Gb - Compare Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 4 8/128GB - Compare |
353.13€ ($380.26) See Details |
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Samsung Galaxy A90 5G’s camera vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact’s camera, see the difference between the 48Mp Samsung GM1 sensor and the 22.6Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | Samsung Galaxy A90 5G | Sharp Aquos R2 Compact |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 48 Mp | 22.6 Mp |
| Sensor model | Samsung GM1 | |
| Flash | Dual LED flash | LED flash |
| Front (selfie) camera | 32 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Flash | No | No |
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Samsung Galaxy A90 5G vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | Samsung Galaxy A90 5G | Sharp Aquos R2 Compact |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 4500 mAh | 2500 mAh |
| Type | Non-removable | Non-removable |
| Stand-by time | 6-7 days | 5-6 days |
| Battery Life | 2-3 days | 2-3 days |
| Working hours in hard mode | 8-9 hours | 5-6 hours |
| Talk time | 25 hours | 25 hours |
| Fast charging | Yes | Yes |
| Wireless charging | No | Yes |
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 432666 score points which is 56.51% faster than the Sharp Aquos R2 Compact, which got 276448. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 736 points score in "Single-core" of against the Sharp Aquos R2 Compact which got 501, it is 46.91% faster. In "Multi-core" score 2584 vs 1986 (30.11% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Samsung Galaxy A90 5G and Sharp Aquos R2 Compact? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Samsung Galaxy A90 5G (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 56.51% faster in the Antutu test (156218 score difference).
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 48Mp Samsung GM1 compared to 22.6Mp
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 32Mp Samsung S5KGD1 vs 8Mp .
- Has a higher screen resolution: 2400x1080 vs 2280x1080.
- More battery capacity: 4500mAh vs 2500mAh (a difference of 2000mAh).
Why it is better not to take Samsung Galaxy A90 5G (disadvantages)
- Does not have water resistant supports.
- Does not have wireless charging support.
- Does not have Headphone Jack. Need audio 3.5mm headphone jack adapter
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Sharp Aquos R2 Compact (advantages)
- Best weight: 67 grams less (139 vs 206).
- Have water resistant supports.
- Have wireless charging supports.
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Why it is better not to take Sharp Aquos R2 Compact (disadvantages)
The advantages of both models
- NFC supports.
- Have fast charging supports.
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G related comparisons
- Compare Samsung Galaxy A53 5G vs Samsung Galaxy A90 5G
- Compare Samsung Galaxy A90 5G vs Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
- Compare Samsung Galaxy A90 5G vs Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
- Compare Samsung Galaxy A90 5G vs LG V50 ThinQ 5G
- Compare Samsung Galaxy A90 5G vs Samsung Galaxy A72 5G
Sharp Aquos R2 Compact related comparisons
- Compare AGM A8 vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact
- Compare Nomu M8 vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact
- Compare Nomu S50 Pro vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact
- Compare Sharp Aquos R3 vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact
- Compare Sharp AQUOS S2 vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact