Compare Sharp Aquos R2 Compact vs Samsung Galaxy M12 3/32GB
| Name | Sharp Aquos R2 Compact | Samsung Galaxy M12 3/32GB |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Antutu benchmark | 276448 | 129663 |
| CPU | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 | Samsung Exynos 850 |
| Diagonal size | 5.2 " | 6.4 " |
| Resolution | 2280x1080 | 1600x720 |
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 10 |
| RAM | 4 Gb | 3 Gb |
| Bezel-less | Yes | Yes |
| ROM | 64 GB | 32 GB |
| External memory | No | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb |
| Rear camera | 22.6 Mp | 48 Mp |
| Camera | Single camera | Four cameras |
| Sensor model | Samsung GM2 | |
| dxomark mobile ranking | ||
| dxomark (photo) | ||
| dxomark (video) | ||
| Front (selfie) camera | 8 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Battery | 2500 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Wireless charging | Yes | No |
| Network | 4 G | 4 G |
| WiFi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS |
| Notifications Led | Yes | No |
| Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | Yes |
| Operating system (OS) | Android 9.0 | Android 11 |
| Material | Metal | Plastic |
| Weight | 139 g | 221 g |
| Dimensions | 131 х 64 х 9,3 mm | 164 x 75,9 x 9,7 mm |
| Price | 344.16€ ($368.13) See Details | 106.00€ ($113.38) See Details |
Sharp Aquos R2 Compact vs Samsung Galaxy M12 3/32GB: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Sharp Aquos R2 Compact’s camera vs Samsung Galaxy M12’s camera, see the difference between the 22.6Mp sensor and the 48Mp Samsung GM2 sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | Sharp Aquos R2 Compact | Samsung Galaxy M12 3/32GB |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 22.6 Mp | 48 Mp |
| Sensor model | Samsung GM2 | |
| Flash | LED flash | LED flash |
| Front (selfie) camera | 8 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Flash | No | No |
Sharp Aquos R2 Compact vs Samsung Galaxy M12 3/32GB: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Sharp Aquos R2 Compact vs Samsung Galaxy M12, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | Sharp Aquos R2 Compact | Samsung Galaxy M12 3/32GB |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 2500 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Type | Non-removable | Non-removable |
| Stand-by time | 5-6 days | 6-7 days |
| Battery Life | 2-3 days | 3-4 days |
| Working hours in hard mode | 5-6 hours | 10-12 hours |
| Talk time | 25 hours | 30 hours |
| Fast charging | Yes | Yes |
| Wireless charging | Yes | No |
Sharp Aquos R2 Compact vs Samsung Galaxy M12 3/32GB: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Sharp Aquos R2 Compact in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 276448 score points which is 113.21% faster than the Samsung Galaxy M12 3/32GB, which got 129663. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Sharp Aquos R2 Compact vs Samsung Galaxy M12 3/32GB: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Sharp Aquos R2 Compact in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 501 points score in "Single-core" of against the Samsung Galaxy M12 3/32GB which got 162, it is 209.26% faster. In "Multi-core" score 1986 vs 933 (112.86% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Sharp Aquos R2 Compact and Samsung Galaxy M12 3/32GB? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Sharp Aquos R2 Compact (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 113.21% faster in the Antutu test (146785 score difference).
- Best weight: 82 grams less (139 vs 221).
- Has a higher screen resolution: 2280x1080 vs 1600x720.
- Have water resistant supports.
- Have wireless charging supports.
Why it is better not to take Sharp Aquos R2 Compact (disadvantages)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Samsung Galaxy M12 3/32GB (advantages)
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 48Mp Samsung GM2 compared to 22.6Mp
- More battery capacity: 5000mAh vs 2500mAh (a difference of 2500mAh).
Why it is better not to take Samsung Galaxy M12 3/32GB (disadvantages)
- Does not have water resistant supports.
- Does not have wireless charging support.
The advantages of both models
- NFC supports.
- Have fast charging supports.
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Sharp Aquos R2 Compact related comparisons
- Compare AGM A8 vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact
- Compare Nomu M8 vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact
- Compare Nomu S50 Pro vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact
- Compare Sharp Aquos R3 vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact
- Compare Sharp AQUOS S2 vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact
Samsung Galaxy M12 3/32GB related comparisons
- Compare Samsung Galaxy M12 vs Samsung Galaxy A12 5G
- Compare Samsung Galaxy A22 4G vs Samsung Galaxy M12
- Compare Samsung Galaxy M12 vs Samsung Galaxy A03s
- Compare Samsung Galaxy M12 vs Samsung Galaxy A02s
- Compare Samsung Galaxy M21 vs Samsung Galaxy M12