Compare Sharp Aquos R2 Compact vs Samsung Galaxy M51
| Name | Sharp Aquos R2 Compact | Samsung Galaxy M51 |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Antutu benchmark | 276448 | 267699 |
| CPU | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G |
| Diagonal size | 5.2 " | 6.67 " |
| Resolution | 2280x1080 | 2400x1080 |
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 10 |
| RAM | 4 Gb | 6 Gb |
| Bezel-less | Yes | Yes |
| ROM | 64 GB | 128 GB |
| External memory | No | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb |
| Rear camera | 22.6 Mp | 64 Mp |
| Camera | Single camera | Four cameras |
| Sensor model | Sony IMX682 | |
| dxomark mobile ranking | ||
| dxomark (photo) | ||
| dxomark (video) | ||
| Front (selfie) camera | 8 Mp | 32 Mp |
| Battery | 2500 mAh | 7000 mAh |
| Wireless charging | Yes | No |
| Network | 4 G | 4 G |
| WiFi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS |
| Notifications Led | Yes | No |
| Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | Yes |
| Operating system (OS) | Android 9.0 | Android 10.0 (Q) |
| Material | Metal | Plastic |
| Weight | 139 g | 213 g |
| Dimensions | 131 х 64 х 9,3 mm | 163,9 x 76,3 x 9,5 mm |
| Price | 345.95€ ($369.04) See Details |
Discontinued.
View all Samsung models here
Alternatives to the Samsung Galaxy M51: Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 4 8/128GB - Compare Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra - Compare Samsung Galaxy S20 Plus - Compare |
Sharp Aquos R2 Compact vs Samsung Galaxy M51: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Sharp Aquos R2 Compact’s camera vs Samsung Galaxy M51’s camera, see the difference between the 22.6Mp sensor and the 64Mp Sony IMX682 sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | Sharp Aquos R2 Compact | Samsung Galaxy M51 |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 22.6 Mp | 64 Mp |
| Sensor model | Sony IMX682 | |
| Flash | LED flash | Dual LED flash |
| Front (selfie) camera | 8 Mp | 32 Mp |
| Flash | No | No |
Sharp Aquos R2 Compact vs Samsung Galaxy M51: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Sharp Aquos R2 Compact vs Samsung Galaxy M51, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | Sharp Aquos R2 Compact | Samsung Galaxy M51 |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 2500 mAh | 7000 mAh |
| Type | Non-removable | Non-removable |
| Stand-by time | 5-6 days | 6-7 days |
| Battery Life | 2-3 days | 3-4 days |
| Working hours in hard mode | 5-6 hours | 14-15 hours |
| Talk time | 25 hours | 30 hours |
| Fast charging | Yes | Yes |
| Wireless charging | Yes | No |
Sharp Aquos R2 Compact vs Samsung Galaxy M51: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Sharp Aquos R2 Compact in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 276448 score points which is 3.27% faster than the Samsung Galaxy M51, which got 267699. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Sharp Aquos R2 Compact vs Samsung Galaxy M51: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Sharp Aquos R2 Compact in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 501 points score in "Single-core" of against the Samsung Galaxy M51 which got 382, it is 31.15% faster. In "Multi-core" score 1986 vs 1518 (30.83% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Sharp Aquos R2 Compact and Samsung Galaxy M51? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Sharp Aquos R2 Compact (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 3.27% faster in the Antutu test (8749 score difference).
- Best weight: 74 grams less (139 vs 213).
- Have water resistant supports.
- Have wireless charging supports.
Why it is better not to take Sharp Aquos R2 Compact (disadvantages)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Samsung Galaxy M51 (advantages)
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 64Mp Sony IMX682 compared to 22.6Mp
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 32Mp Sony IMX616 vs 8Mp .
- Has a higher screen resolution: 2400x1080 vs 2280x1080.
- More battery capacity: 7000mAh vs 2500mAh (a difference of 4500mAh).
Why it is better not to take Samsung Galaxy M51 (disadvantages)
- Does not have water resistant supports.
- Does not have wireless charging support.
The advantages of both models
- NFC supports.
- Have fast charging supports.
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Sharp Aquos R2 Compact related comparisons
- Compare AGM A8 vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact
- Compare Nomu M8 vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact
- Compare Nomu S50 Pro vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact
- Compare Sharp Aquos R3 vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact
- Compare Sharp AQUOS S2 vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact
Samsung Galaxy M51 related comparisons
- Compare Samsung Galaxy A52 5G vs Samsung Galaxy M51
- Compare Samsung Galaxy M51 vs Samsung Galaxy A72
- Compare Samsung Galaxy M62 vs Samsung Galaxy M51
- Compare Samsung Galaxy M51 vs Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
- Compare Samsung Galaxy M51 vs Samsung Galaxy M31S