Compare Sharp Aquos R2 Compact vs Samsung Galaxy Xcover Pro
| Name | Sharp Aquos R2 Compact | Samsung Galaxy Xcover Pro |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Antutu benchmark | 276448 | 176833 |
| CPU | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 | Samsung Exynos 9611 |
| Diagonal size | 5.2 " | 6.3 " |
| Resolution | 2280x1080 | 2400x1080 |
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 10 |
| RAM | 4 Gb | 4 Gb |
| Bezel-less | Yes | No |
| ROM | 64 GB | 64 GB |
| External memory | No | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb |
| Rear camera | 22.6 Mp | 25 Mp |
| Camera | Single camera | Dual Camera |
| Sensor model | ||
| dxomark mobile ranking | ||
| dxomark (photo) | ||
| dxomark (video) | ||
| Front (selfie) camera | 8 Mp | 13 Mp |
| Battery | 2500 mAh | 4050 mAh |
| Wireless charging | Yes | No |
| Network | 4 G | 4 G |
| WiFi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS |
| Notifications Led | Yes | No |
| Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | Yes |
| Operating system (OS) | Android 9.0 | Android 10.0 (Q) |
| Material | Metal | Plastic |
| Weight | 139 g | 218 g |
| Dimensions | 131 х 64 х 9,3 mm | 159,9 x 76,7 x 9,9 mm |
| Price | 347.35€ ($374.62) See Details | 440.00€ ($474.54) See Details |
Sharp Aquos R2 Compact vs Samsung Galaxy Xcover Pro: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Sharp Aquos R2 Compact’s camera vs Samsung Galaxy Xcover Pro’s camera, see the difference between the 22.6Mp sensor and the 25Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | Sharp Aquos R2 Compact | Samsung Galaxy Xcover Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 22.6 Mp | 25 Mp |
| Sensor model | ||
| Flash | LED flash | Dual LED flash |
| Front (selfie) camera | 8 Mp | 13 Mp |
| Flash | No | No |
Sharp Aquos R2 Compact vs Samsung Galaxy Xcover Pro: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Sharp Aquos R2 Compact vs Samsung Galaxy Xcover Pro, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | Sharp Aquos R2 Compact | Samsung Galaxy Xcover Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 2500 mAh | 4050 mAh |
| Type | Non-removable | Non-removable |
| Stand-by time | 5-6 days | 5-6 days |
| Battery Life | 2-3 days | 2-3 days |
| Working hours in hard mode | 5-6 hours | 7-8 hours |
| Talk time | 25 hours | 30 hours |
| Fast charging | Yes | Yes |
| Wireless charging | Yes | No |
Sharp Aquos R2 Compact vs Samsung Galaxy Xcover Pro: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Sharp Aquos R2 Compact in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 276448 score points which is 56.33% faster than the Samsung Galaxy Xcover Pro, which got 176833. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Sharp Aquos R2 Compact vs Samsung Galaxy Xcover Pro: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Sharp Aquos R2 Compact in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 501 points score in "Single-core" of against the Samsung Galaxy Xcover Pro which got 323, it is 55.11% faster. In "Multi-core" score 1986 vs 1120 (77.32% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Sharp Aquos R2 Compact and Samsung Galaxy Xcover Pro? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Sharp Aquos R2 Compact (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 56.33% faster in the Antutu test (99615 score difference).
- Best weight: 79 grams less (139 vs 218).
- Have wireless charging supports.
Why it is better not to take Sharp Aquos R2 Compact (disadvantages)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Samsung Galaxy Xcover Pro (advantages)
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 25Mp compared to 22.6Mp
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 13Mp vs 8Mp .
- Has a higher screen resolution: 2400x1080 vs 2280x1080.
- More battery capacity: 4050mAh vs 2500mAh (a difference of 1550mAh).
Why it is better not to take Samsung Galaxy Xcover Pro (disadvantages)
- Does not have wireless charging support.
The advantages of both models
- NFC supports.
- Have water resistant supports.
- Have fast charging supports.
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Sharp Aquos R2 Compact related comparisons
- Compare AGM A8 vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact
- Compare Nomu M8 vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact
- Compare Nomu S50 Pro vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact
- Compare Sharp Aquos R3 vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact
- Compare Sharp AQUOS S2 vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact
Samsung Galaxy Xcover Pro related comparisons
- Compare Samsung Galaxy A52 5G vs Samsung Galaxy Xcover Pro
- Compare Doogee S96 Pro vs Samsung Galaxy Xcover Pro
- Compare Blackview BV6300 Pro vs Samsung Galaxy Xcover Pro
- Compare Samsung Galaxy Xcover Pro vs Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra
- Compare Samsung Galaxy A82 vs Samsung Galaxy Xcover Pro