Compare Sharp Aquos R2 Compact vs Ulefone Armor 3WT
| Name | Sharp Aquos R2 Compact | Ulefone Armor 3WT |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Antutu benchmark | 276448 | 148199 |
| CPU | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 | MediaTek Helio P70 |
| Diagonal size | 5.2 " | 5.7 " |
| Resolution | 2280x1080 | 2160x1080 |
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 10 |
| RAM | 4 Gb | 6 Gb |
| Bezel-less | Yes | No |
| ROM | 64 GB | 64 GB |
| External memory | No | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb |
| Rear camera | 22.6 Mp | 21 Mp |
| Camera | Single camera | Single camera |
| Sensor model | Sony IMX230 | |
| dxomark mobile ranking | ||
| dxomark (photo) | ||
| dxomark (video) | ||
| Front (selfie) camera | 8 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Battery | 2500 mAh | 10300 mAh |
| Wireless charging | Yes | No |
| Network | 4 G | 4 G |
| WiFi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS |
| Notifications Led | Yes | Yes |
| Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | Yes |
| Operating system (OS) | Android 9.0 | Android 9.0 |
| Material | Metal | Plastics and rubber |
| Weight | 139 g | 364 g |
| Dimensions | 131 х 64 х 9,3 mm | 164,8 x 79,2 x 18,2 mm |
| Price | 336.85€ ($390.90) See Details | 247.91€ ($287.69) See Details |
Sharp Aquos R2 Compact vs Ulefone Armor 3WT: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Sharp Aquos R2 Compact’s camera vs Ulefone Armor 3WT’s camera, see the difference between the 22.6Mp sensor and the 21Mp Sony IMX230 sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | Sharp Aquos R2 Compact | Ulefone Armor 3WT |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 22.6 Mp | 21 Mp |
| Sensor model | Sony IMX230 | |
| Flash | LED flash | Dual LED flash |
| Front (selfie) camera | 8 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Flash | No | No |
Sharp Aquos R2 Compact vs Ulefone Armor 3WT: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Sharp Aquos R2 Compact vs Ulefone Armor 3WT, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | Sharp Aquos R2 Compact | Ulefone Armor 3WT |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 2500 mAh | 10300 mAh |
| Type | Non-removable | Non-removable |
| Stand-by time | 5-6 days | 8-9 days |
| Battery Life | 2-3 days | 5-6 days |
| Working hours in hard mode | 5-6 hours | 14-15 hours |
| Talk time | 25 hours | 30 hours |
| Fast charging | Yes | Yes |
| Wireless charging | Yes | No |
Sharp Aquos R2 Compact vs Ulefone Armor 3WT: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Sharp Aquos R2 Compact in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 276448 score points which is 86.54% faster than the Ulefone Armor 3WT, which got 148199. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Sharp Aquos R2 Compact vs Ulefone Armor 3WT: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Sharp Aquos R2 Compact in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 501 points score in "Single-core" of against the Ulefone Armor 3WT which got 320, it is 56.56% faster. In "Multi-core" score 1986 vs 1475 (34.64% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Sharp Aquos R2 Compact and Ulefone Armor 3WT? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Sharp Aquos R2 Compact (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 86.54% faster in the Antutu test (128249 score difference).
- Best weight: 225 grams less (139 vs 364).
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 22.6Mp compared to 21Mp Sony IMX230
- Has a higher screen resolution: 2280x1080 vs 2160x1080.
- Have wireless charging supports.
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Why it is better not to take Sharp Aquos R2 Compact (disadvantages)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Ulefone Armor 3WT (advantages)
- More battery capacity: 10300mAh vs 2500mAh (a difference of 7800mAh).
Why it is better not to take Ulefone Armor 3WT (disadvantages)
- Does not have wireless charging support.
- Does not have Headphone Jack. Need audio 3.5mm headphone jack adapter
The advantages of both models
- NFC supports.
- Have water resistant supports.
- Have fast charging supports.
Sharp Aquos R2 Compact related comparisons
- Compare AGM A8 vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact
- Compare Nomu M8 vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact
- Compare Nomu S50 Pro vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact
- Compare Sharp Aquos R3 vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact
- Compare Sharp AQUOS S2 vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact
Ulefone Armor 3WT related comparisons
- Compare Blackview BV9500 Pro vs Ulefone Armor 3WT
- Compare Ulefone Armor 6E vs Ulefone Armor 3WT
- Compare Ulefone Armor 7 vs Ulefone Armor 3WT
- Compare Blackview BV9800 Pro vs Ulefone Armor 3WT
- Compare Blackview BV9500 Plus vs Ulefone Armor 3WT