Compare Sharp Aquos R2 Compact vs Ulefone Note 9
| Name | Sharp Aquos R2 Compact | Ulefone Note 9 |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Antutu benchmark | 276448 | 74188 |
| CPU | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 | MediaTek Helio A22 |
| Diagonal size | 5.2 " | 6.52 " |
| Resolution | 2280x1080 | 1600x720 |
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 5 |
| RAM | 4 Gb | 2 Gb |
| Bezel-less | Yes | Yes |
| ROM | 64 GB | 16 GB |
| External memory | No | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 128Gb |
| Rear camera | 22.6 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Camera | Single camera | Triple Camera |
| Sensor model | ||
| dxomark mobile ranking | ||
| dxomark (photo) | ||
| dxomark (video) | ||
| Front (selfie) camera | 8 Mp | 5 Mp |
| Battery | 2500 mAh | 4000 mAh |
| Wireless charging | Yes | No |
| Network | 4 G | 4 G |
| WiFi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS |
| Notifications Led | Yes | No |
| Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | Yes |
| Operating system (OS) | Android 9.0 | Android 10.0 (Q) |
| Material | Metal | Plastic |
| Weight | 139 g | g |
| Dimensions | 131 х 64 х 9,3 mm | mm |
| Price | 350.05€ ($405.71) See Details |
Notify me when it goes on sale.
View all Ulefone models here
Alternatives to the Ulefone Note 9: Ulefone Power Armor 18 - Compare Ulefone Armor X12 - Compare Ulefone Note 14 - Compare |
Sharp Aquos R2 Compact vs Ulefone Note 9: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Sharp Aquos R2 Compact’s camera vs Ulefone Note 9’s camera, see the difference between the 22.6Mp sensor and the 8Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | Sharp Aquos R2 Compact | Ulefone Note 9 |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 22.6 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Sensor model | ||
| Flash | LED flash | Dual LED flash |
| Front (selfie) camera | 8 Mp | 5 Mp |
| Flash | No | No |
Sharp Aquos R2 Compact vs Ulefone Note 9: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Sharp Aquos R2 Compact vs Ulefone Note 9, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | Sharp Aquos R2 Compact | Ulefone Note 9 |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 2500 mAh | 4000 mAh |
| Type | Non-removable | Non-removable |
| Stand-by time | 5-6 days | 6-7 days |
| Battery Life | 2-3 days | 2-3 days |
| Working hours in hard mode | 5-6 hours | 8-9 hours |
| Talk time | 25 hours | 25 hours |
| Fast charging | Yes | No |
| Wireless charging | Yes | No |
Sharp Aquos R2 Compact vs Ulefone Note 9: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Sharp Aquos R2 Compact in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 276448 score points which is 272.63% faster than the Ulefone Note 9, which got 74188. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Sharp Aquos R2 Compact vs Ulefone Note 9: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Sharp Aquos R2 Compact in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 501 points score in "Single-core" of against the Ulefone Note 9 which got 161, it is 211.18% faster. In "Multi-core" score 1986 vs 538 (269.14% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Sharp Aquos R2 Compact and Ulefone Note 9? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Sharp Aquos R2 Compact (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 272.63% faster in the Antutu test (202260 score difference).
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 22.6Mp compared to 8Mp
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 8Mp vs 5Mp .
- NFC supports.
- Has a higher screen resolution: 2280x1080 vs 1600x720.
- Have water resistant supports.
- Have wireless charging supports.
- Have fast charging supports.
Why it is better not to take Sharp Aquos R2 Compact (disadvantages)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Ulefone Note 9 (advantages)
- More battery capacity: 4000mAh vs 2500mAh (a difference of 1500mAh).
Why it is better not to take Ulefone Note 9 (disadvantages)
- Does not support NFC.
- Does not have water resistant supports.
- Does not have wireless charging support.
- Does not have fast charging support
The advantages of both models
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Sharp Aquos R2 Compact related comparisons
- Compare AGM A8 vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact
- Compare Nomu M8 vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact
- Compare Nomu S50 Pro vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact
- Compare Sharp Aquos R3 vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact
- Compare Sharp AQUOS S2 vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact
Ulefone Note 9 related comparisons
- Compare Leagoo M11 vs Ulefone Note 9
- Compare Blackview A60 Pro vs Ulefone Note 9
- Compare Doogee X95 vs Ulefone Note 9
- Compare Ulefone Armor 7 vs Ulefone Note 9
- Compare Ulefone Note 9 vs Nokia 2.3