Compare Vivo IQOO Neo 3 8/128Gb vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact
| Name | Vivo IQOO Neo 3 8/128Gb | Sharp Aquos R2 Compact |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Antutu benchmark | 583188 | 276448 |
| CPU | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 |
| Diagonal size | 6.57 " | 5.2 " |
| Resolution | 2408x1080 | 2280x1080 |
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 10 |
| RAM | 8 Gb | 4 Gb |
| Bezel-less | Yes | Yes |
| ROM | 128 GB | 64 GB |
| External memory | No | No |
| Rear camera | 48 Mp | 22.6 Mp |
| Camera | Triple Camera | Single camera |
| Sensor model | Samsung GM1 | |
| dxomark mobile ranking | ||
| dxomark (photo) | ||
| dxomark (video) | ||
| Front (selfie) camera | 16 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Battery | 4500 mAh | 2500 mAh |
| Wireless charging | No | Yes |
| Network | 5 G | 4 G |
| WiFi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS |
| Notifications Led | Yes | Yes |
| Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | Yes |
| Operating system (OS) | Android 10.0 (Q) | Android 9.0 |
| Material | Metal frame and glass case | Metal |
| Weight | 198 g | 139 g |
| Dimensions | 163.7 x 75.6 x 8.9 mm | 131 х 64 х 9,3 mm |
| Price |
Discontinued.
View all Vivo models here
Alternatives to the Vivo IQOO Neo 3 8/128Gb: Vivo IQOO Neo7 8/128GB - Compare Vivo iQOO Neo5 SE 12/256GB - Compare Vivo IQOO 10 Pro 12/256GB - Compare |
349.68€ ($403.86) See Details |
Vivo IQOO Neo 3 8/128Gb vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Vivo IQOO Neo 3’s camera vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact’s camera, see the difference between the 48Mp Samsung GM1 sensor and the 22.6Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | Vivo IQOO Neo 3 8/128Gb | Sharp Aquos R2 Compact |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 48 Mp | 22.6 Mp |
| Sensor model | Samsung GM1 | |
| Flash | Dual LED flash | LED flash |
| Front (selfie) camera | 16 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Flash | No | No |
Vivo IQOO Neo 3 8/128Gb vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Vivo IQOO Neo 3 vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | Vivo IQOO Neo 3 8/128Gb | Sharp Aquos R2 Compact |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 4500 mAh | 2500 mAh |
| Type | Non-removable | Non-removable |
| Stand-by time | 6-7 days | 5-6 days |
| Battery Life | 3-4 days | 2-3 days |
| Working hours in hard mode | 10-12 hours | 5-6 hours |
| Talk time | 30 hours | 25 hours |
| Fast charging | Yes | Yes |
| Wireless charging | No | Yes |
Vivo IQOO Neo 3 8/128Gb vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Vivo IQOO Neo 3 8/128Gb in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 583188 score points which is 110.96% faster than the Sharp Aquos R2 Compact, which got 276448. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Vivo IQOO Neo 3 8/128Gb vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Vivo IQOO Neo 3 8/128Gb in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 924 points score in "Single-core" of against the Sharp Aquos R2 Compact which got 501, it is 84.43% faster. In "Multi-core" score 3449 vs 1986 (73.67% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Vivo IQOO Neo 3 8/128Gb and Sharp Aquos R2 Compact? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Vivo IQOO Neo 3 8/128Gb (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 110.96% faster in the Antutu test (306740 score difference).
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 48Mp Samsung GM1 compared to 22.6Mp
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 16Mp vs 8Mp .
- Has a higher screen resolution: 2408x1080 vs 2280x1080.
- More battery capacity: 4500mAh vs 2500mAh (a difference of 2000mAh).
Why it is better not to take Vivo IQOO Neo 3 8/128Gb (disadvantages)
- Does not have water resistant supports.
- Does not have wireless charging support.
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Sharp Aquos R2 Compact (advantages)
- Best weight: 59 grams less (139 vs 198).
- Have water resistant supports.
- Have wireless charging supports.
Why it is better not to take Sharp Aquos R2 Compact (disadvantages)
The advantages of both models
- NFC supports.
- Have fast charging supports.
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Vivo IQOO Neo 3 8/128Gb related comparisons
- Compare Huawei Honor X10 Max vs Vivo IQOO Neo 3
- Compare Vivo IQOO Neo 5 vs Vivo IQOO Neo 3
- Compare Vivo U1 vs Vivo IQOO Neo 3
- Compare Vivo Apex 2019 vs Vivo IQOO Neo 3
- Compare Vivo IQOO Neo 3 vs Elephone P7
Sharp Aquos R2 Compact related comparisons
- Compare AGM A8 vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact
- Compare Nomu M8 vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact
- Compare Nomu S50 Pro vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact
- Compare Sharp Aquos R3 vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact
- Compare Sharp AQUOS S2 vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact