Compare Xiaomi Black Shark 3S vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact
| Name | Xiaomi Black Shark 3S | Sharp Aquos R2 Compact |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Antutu benchmark | 657199 | 276448 |
| CPU | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 |
| Diagonal size | 6.67 " | 5.2 " |
| Resolution | 2400x1080 | 2280x1080 |
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 10 |
| RAM | 12 Gb | 4 Gb |
| Bezel-less | Yes | Yes |
| ROM | 256 GB | 64 GB |
| External memory | No | No |
| Rear camera | 64 Mp | 22.6 Mp |
| Camera | Triple Camera | Single camera |
| Sensor model | Samsung GW1 | |
| dxomark mobile ranking | ||
| dxomark (photo) | ||
| dxomark (video) | ||
| Front (selfie) camera | 20 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Battery | 4720 mAh | 2500 mAh |
| Wireless charging | No | Yes |
| Network | 4 G | 4 G |
| WiFi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS |
| Notifications Led | No | Yes |
| Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | Yes |
| Operating system (OS) | Android 10.0 (Q) | Android 9.0 |
| Material | Metal | Metal |
| Weight | 222 g | 139 g |
| Dimensions | 168.7 x 77.3 x 10.4 mm | 131 х 64 х 9,3 mm |
| Price |
Discontinued.
View all Xiaomi models here
Alternatives to the Xiaomi Black Shark 3S: Xiaomi Mi 11 Pro 8/128Gb - Compare Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 8/128GB - Compare Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G 6/128GB - Compare |
347.93€ ($400.05) See Details |
Xiaomi Black Shark 3S vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Xiaomi Black Shark 3S’s camera vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact’s camera, see the difference between the 64Mp Samsung GW1 sensor and the 22.6Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | Xiaomi Black Shark 3S | Sharp Aquos R2 Compact |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 64 Mp | 22.6 Mp |
| Sensor model | Samsung GW1 | |
| Flash | Dual LED flash | LED flash |
| Front (selfie) camera | 20 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Flash | No | No |
Xiaomi Black Shark 3S vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Xiaomi Black Shark 3S vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | Xiaomi Black Shark 3S | Sharp Aquos R2 Compact |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 4720 mAh | 2500 mAh |
| Type | Non-removable | Non-removable |
| Stand-by time | 6-7 days | 5-6 days |
| Battery Life | 2-3 days | 2-3 days |
| Working hours in hard mode | 10-12 hours | 5-6 hours |
| Talk time | 30 hours | 25 hours |
| Fast charging | Yes | Yes |
| Wireless charging | No | Yes |
Xiaomi Black Shark 3S vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Xiaomi Black Shark 3S in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 657199 score points which is 137.73% faster than the Sharp Aquos R2 Compact, which got 276448. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Xiaomi Black Shark 3S vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Xiaomi Black Shark 3S in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 904 points score in "Single-core" of against the Sharp Aquos R2 Compact which got 501, it is 80.44% faster. In "Multi-core" score 3315 vs 1986 (66.92% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Xiaomi Black Shark 3S and Sharp Aquos R2 Compact? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Xiaomi Black Shark 3S (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 137.73% faster in the Antutu test (380751 score difference).
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 64Mp Samsung GW1 compared to 22.6Mp
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 20Mp Samsung S5K3T2 vs 8Mp .
- Has a higher screen resolution: 2400x1080 vs 2280x1080.
- More battery capacity: 4720mAh vs 2500mAh (a difference of 2220mAh).
Why it is better not to take Xiaomi Black Shark 3S (disadvantages)
- Does not support NFC.
- Does not have water resistant supports.
- Does not have wireless charging support.
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Sharp Aquos R2 Compact (advantages)
- Best weight: 83 grams less (139 vs 222).
- NFC supports.
- Have water resistant supports.
- Have wireless charging supports.
Why it is better not to take Sharp Aquos R2 Compact (disadvantages)
The advantages of both models
- Have fast charging supports.
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Xiaomi Black Shark 3S related comparisons
- Compare Xiaomi Black Shark 3 vs Xiaomi Black Shark 3S
- Compare Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro vs Xiaomi Black Shark 3S
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi K30 Pro vs Xiaomi Black Shark 3S
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi Note 9s vs Xiaomi Black Shark 3S
- Compare OnePlus 8 vs Xiaomi Black Shark 3S
Sharp Aquos R2 Compact related comparisons
- Compare AGM A8 vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact
- Compare Nomu M8 vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact
- Compare Nomu S50 Pro vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact
- Compare Sharp Aquos R3 vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact
- Compare Sharp AQUOS S2 vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact