Compare Sharp Aquos R2 Compact vs Xiaomi CC9 6/128Gb
| Name | Sharp Aquos R2 Compact | Xiaomi CC9 6/128Gb |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Antutu benchmark | 276448 | 179211 |
| CPU | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 |
| Diagonal size | 5.2 " | 6.39 " |
| Resolution | 2280x1080 | 2340x1080 |
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 10 |
| RAM | 4 Gb | 6 Gb |
| Bezel-less | Yes | Yes |
| ROM | 64 GB | 128 GB |
| External memory | No | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb |
| Rear camera | 22.6 Mp | 48 Mp |
| Camera | Single camera | Triple Camera |
| Sensor model | Sony IMX586 | |
| dxomark mobile ranking | ||
| dxomark (photo) | ||
| dxomark (video) | ||
| Front (selfie) camera | 8 Mp | 32 Mp |
| Battery | 2500 mAh | 4030 mAh |
| Wireless charging | Yes | No |
| Network | 4 G | 4 G |
| WiFi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS |
| Notifications Led | Yes | Yes |
| Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | Yes |
| Operating system (OS) | Android 9.0 | Android 9.0 |
| Material | Metal | Metal frame and glass case |
| Weight | 139 g | 179 g |
| Dimensions | 131 х 64 х 9,3 mm | 156.8 х 74.5 х 8.67 mm |
| Price | 349.68€ ($403.86) See Details |
Discontinued.
View all Xiaomi models here
Alternatives to the Xiaomi CC9 6/128Gb: Xiaomi Black Shark 4 6/128GB - Compare Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 3/64Gb - Compare Xiaomi Redmi K50 Pro 8/256GB - Compare |
Sharp Aquos R2 Compact vs Xiaomi CC9 6/128Gb: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Sharp Aquos R2 Compact’s camera vs Xiaomi CC9’s camera, see the difference between the 22.6Mp sensor and the 48Mp Sony IMX586 sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | Sharp Aquos R2 Compact | Xiaomi CC9 6/128Gb |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 22.6 Mp | 48 Mp |
| Sensor model | Sony IMX586 | |
| Flash | LED flash | Dual LED flash |
| Front (selfie) camera | 8 Mp | 32 Mp |
| Flash | No | No |
Sharp Aquos R2 Compact vs Xiaomi CC9 6/128Gb: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Sharp Aquos R2 Compact vs Xiaomi CC9, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | Sharp Aquos R2 Compact | Xiaomi CC9 6/128Gb |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 2500 mAh | 4030 mAh |
| Type | Non-removable | Non-removable |
| Stand-by time | 5-6 days | 6-7 days |
| Battery Life | 2-3 days | 3-4 days |
| Working hours in hard mode | 5-6 hours | 8-9 hours |
| Talk time | 25 hours | 25 hours |
| Fast charging | Yes | Yes |
| Wireless charging | Yes | No |
Sharp Aquos R2 Compact vs Xiaomi CC9 6/128Gb: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Sharp Aquos R2 Compact in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 276448 score points which is 54.26% faster than the Xiaomi CC9 6/128Gb, which got 179211. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Sharp Aquos R2 Compact vs Xiaomi CC9 6/128Gb: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Sharp Aquos R2 Compact in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 501 points score in "Single-core" of against the Xiaomi CC9 6/128Gb which got 313, it is 60.06% faster. In "Multi-core" score 1986 vs 1444 (37.53% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Sharp Aquos R2 Compact and Xiaomi CC9 6/128Gb? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Sharp Aquos R2 Compact (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 54.26% faster in the Antutu test (97237 score difference).
- Best weight: 40 grams less (139 vs 179).
- Have water resistant supports.
- Have wireless charging supports.
Why it is better not to take Sharp Aquos R2 Compact (disadvantages)
- Does not have infrared blaster supports.
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Xiaomi CC9 6/128Gb (advantages)
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 48Mp Sony IMX586 compared to 22.6Mp
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 32Mp Samsung S5KGD1 vs 8Mp .
- Has a higher screen resolution: 2340x1080 vs 2280x1080.
- More battery capacity: 4030mAh vs 2500mAh (a difference of 1530mAh).
- Have infrared blaster supports.
Why it is better not to take Xiaomi CC9 6/128Gb (disadvantages)
- Does not have water resistant supports.
- Does not have wireless charging support.
The advantages of both models
- NFC supports.
- Have fast charging supports.
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Sharp Aquos R2 Compact related comparisons
- Compare AGM A8 vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact
- Compare Nomu M8 vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact
- Compare Nomu S50 Pro vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact
- Compare Sharp Aquos R3 vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact
- Compare Sharp AQUOS S2 vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact
Xiaomi CC9 6/128Gb related comparisons
- Compare Xiaomi Mi A3 vs Xiaomi CC9
- Compare Huawei Honor V20 vs Xiaomi CC9
- Compare Doogee S90 vs Xiaomi CC9
- Compare Xiaomi CC9 vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
- Compare Elephone U3H vs Xiaomi CC9