0
Compare:
Compare with:
Please enter model name or part of it
 
AED درهم BHD دب BRL R$ CNY ¥ CZK Kč DKK kr EUR € GBP £ IDR Rp ILS ₪ INR ₹ JPY ¥ KRW ₩ KWD د.ك NOK kr PLN zł QAR ريال RUB руб SAR SAR SEK kr TRY ₺ UAH грн
You were probably searching for:
Reviews

Compare Sharp Aquos R2 Compact vs Xiaomi CC9 Pro 8/256Gb

Sharp Aquos R2 Compact vs Xiaomi CC9 Pro 8/256Gb Comparison - Compare Size, Cameras, Specs, Features, Price of Sharp Aquos R2 Compact with Xiaomi CC9 Pro 8/256Gb.

Name Sharp Aquos R2 Compact Xiaomi CC9 Pro 8/256Gb
Sharp Aquos R2 Compact Xiaomi CC9 Pro 8/256Gb
Antutu benchmark 276448 263117
CPU Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
Diagonal size 5.2 " 6.47 "
Resolution 2280x1080 2340x1080
Multi-touch (number of touches) 10 10
RAM 4 Gb 8 Gb
Bezel-less Yes Yes
ROM 64 GB 256 GB
External memory No No
Rear camera 22.6 Mp 108 Mp
Camera Single camera Five cameras
Sensor model Samsung ISOCELL Bright HMX
dxomark mobile ranking
dxomark (photo)
dxomark (video)
Front (selfie) camera 8 Mp 32 Mp
Battery 2500 mAh 5260 mAh
Wireless charging Yes No
Network 4 G 4 G
WiFi Yes Yes
Bluetooth Yes Yes
NFC Yes Yes
Navigation (Positioning) GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS
Notifications Led Yes Yes
Fingerprint's scanner Yes Yes
Operating system (OS) Android 9.0 Android 10.0 (Q)
Material Metal Metal frame and glass case
Weight 139 g 208 g
Dimensions 131 х 64 х 9,3 mm 157.8 x 74.2 x 9.7 mm
  Price 350.05€ ($405.71) See Details 371.09€ ($430.09) See Details

Sharp Aquos R2 Compact vs Xiaomi CC9 Pro 8/256Gb: Camera comparison.

In this table, you can compare the Sharp Aquos R2 Compact’s camera vs Xiaomi CC9 Pro’s camera, see the difference between the 22.6Mp sensor and the 108Mp Samsung ISOCELL Bright HMX sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.

Name Sharp Aquos R2 Compact Xiaomi CC9 Pro 8/256Gb
Rear camera 22.6 Mp 108 Mp
Sensor model Samsung ISOCELL Bright HMX
Flash LED flash Dual LED flash
Front (selfie) camera 8 Mp 32 Mp
Flash No No

Sharp Aquos R2 Compact vs Xiaomi CC9 Pro 8/256Gb: battery life comparison.

Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Sharp Aquos R2 Compact vs Xiaomi CC9 Pro, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.

Name Sharp Aquos R2 Compact Xiaomi CC9 Pro 8/256Gb
Battery 2500 mAh 5260 mAh
Type Non-removable Non-removable
Stand-by time 5-6 days 6-7 days
Battery Life 2-3 days 3-4 days
Working hours in hard mode 5-6 hours 10-12 hours
Talk time 25 hours 25 hours
Fast charging Yes Yes
Wireless charging Yes No

Sharp Aquos R2 Compact vs Xiaomi CC9 Pro 8/256Gb: Antutu benchmark comparison. Sharp Aquos R2 Compact vs Xiaomi CC9 Pro 8/256Gb: Antutu benchmark comparison.

Sharp Aquos R2 Compact in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 276448 score points which is 5.07% faster than the Xiaomi CC9 Pro 8/256Gb, which got 263117. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.

Sharp Aquos R2 Compact
5.2" (2280x1080) Curved Glass / Snapdragon 845 / 4Gb / 64GB / 22.6Mp / 2500mAh
350.05€
$405.71
 
Xiaomi CC9 Pro 8/256Gb
6.47" (2340x1080) Gorilla glass / Snapdragon 730G / 8Gb / 256GB / 108Mp Samsung ISOCELL Bright HMX / 5260mAh
371.09€
$430.09
 

Sharp Aquos R2 Compact vs Xiaomi CC9 Pro 8/256Gb: Geekbench benchmark comparison.

Sharp Aquos R2 Compact in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 501 points score in "Single-core" of against the Xiaomi CC9 Pro 8/256Gb which got 549, it is -8.74% faster. In "Multi-core" score 1986 vs 1771 (12.14% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.

Sharp Aquos R2 Compact
5.2" (2280x1080) Curved Glass / Snapdragon 845 / 4Gb / 64GB / 22.6Mp / 2500mAh
350.05€
$405.71
 
Xiaomi CC9 Pro 8/256Gb
6.47" (2340x1080) Gorilla glass / Snapdragon 730G / 8Gb / 256GB / 108Mp Samsung ISOCELL Bright HMX / 5260mAh
371.09€
$430.09
 

What is the difference between Sharp Aquos R2 Compact and Xiaomi CC9 Pro 8/256Gb? (compare specs) (which is better)

The main differences, why it is better to choose the Sharp Aquos R2 Compact (advantages)

  • Good performance: Is 5.07% faster in the Antutu test (13331 score difference).
  • Best weight: 69 grams less (139 vs 208).
  • Have water resistant supports.
  • Have wireless charging supports.
  • Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.

Why it is better not to take Sharp Aquos R2 Compact (disadvantages)

  • Does not have infrared blaster supports.

The main differences, why it is better to choose the Xiaomi CC9 Pro 8/256Gb (advantages)

  • Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 108Mp Samsung ISOCELL Bright HMX compared to 22.6Mp
  • Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 32Mp Samsung S5KGD1 vs 8Mp .
  • Has a higher screen resolution: 2340x1080 vs 2280x1080.
  • More battery capacity: 5260mAh vs 2500mAh (a difference of 2760mAh).
  • Have infrared blaster supports.

Why it is better not to take Xiaomi CC9 Pro 8/256Gb (disadvantages)

  • Does not have water resistant supports.
  • Does not have wireless charging support.
  • Does not have Headphone Jack. Need audio 3.5mm headphone jack adapter

The advantages of both models

  • NFC supports.
  • Have fast charging supports.

Sharp Aquos R2 Compact related comparisons

Xiaomi CC9 Pro 8/256Gb related comparisons

Rate this page: 1-5
4.39/5 of 36
Frequent comparisons