Compare Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro 6/128Gb vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact
| Name | Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro 6/128Gb | Sharp Aquos R2 Compact |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Antutu benchmark | 481446 | 276448 |
| CPU | Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 |
| Diagonal size | 6.67 " | 5.2 " |
| Resolution | 2400x1080 | 2280x1080 |
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 10 |
| RAM | 6 Gb | 4 Gb |
| Bezel-less | Yes | Yes |
| ROM | 128 GB | 64 GB |
| External memory | MicroSD (TF), support of card up to 2Tb | No |
| Rear camera | 48 Mp | 22.6 Mp |
| Camera | Four cameras | Single camera |
| Sensor model | Sony IMX582 | |
| dxomark mobile ranking | ||
| dxomark (photo) | ||
| dxomark (video) | ||
| Front (selfie) camera | 20 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Battery | 5160 mAh | 2500 mAh |
| Wireless charging | No | Yes |
| Network | 4 G | 4 G |
| WiFi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS |
| Notifications Led | Yes | Yes |
| Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | Yes |
| Operating system (OS) | Android 11 | Android 9.0 |
| Material | Plastic | Metal |
| Weight | 215 g | 139 g |
| Dimensions | 165,3 x 76,8 x 9,4 mm | 131 х 64 х 9,3 mm |
| Price | 269.00€ ($287.68) See Details | 344.22€ ($368.13) See Details |
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro 6/128Gb vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro’s camera vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact’s camera, see the difference between the 48Mp Sony IMX582 sensor and the 22.6Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro 6/128Gb | Sharp Aquos R2 Compact |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 48 Mp | 22.6 Mp |
| Sensor model | Sony IMX582 | |
| Flash | LED flash | |
| Front (selfie) camera | 20 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Flash | No | No |
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro 6/128Gb vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro 6/128Gb | Sharp Aquos R2 Compact |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 5160 mAh | 2500 mAh |
| Type | Non-removable | Non-removable |
| Stand-by time | 6-7 days | 5-6 days |
| Battery Life | 2-3 days | 2-3 days |
| Working hours in hard mode | 10-12 hours | 5-6 hours |
| Talk time | 25 hours | 25 hours |
| Fast charging | Yes | Yes |
| Wireless charging | No | Yes |
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro 6/128Gb vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro 6/128Gb in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 481446 score points which is 74.15% faster than the Sharp Aquos R2 Compact, which got 276448. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro 6/128Gb vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro 6/128Gb in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 782 points score in "Single-core" of against the Sharp Aquos R2 Compact which got 501, it is 56.09% faster. In "Multi-core" score 2792 vs 1986 (40.58% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro 6/128Gb and Sharp Aquos R2 Compact? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro 6/128Gb (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 74.15% faster in the Antutu test (204998 score difference).
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 48Mp Sony IMX582 compared to 22.6Mp
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 20Mp vs 8Mp .
- Has a higher screen resolution: 2400x1080 vs 2280x1080.
- More battery capacity: 5160mAh vs 2500mAh (a difference of 2660mAh).
- Have infrared blaster supports.
Why it is better not to take Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro 6/128Gb (disadvantages)
- Does not have water resistant supports.
- Does not have wireless charging support.
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Sharp Aquos R2 Compact (advantages)
- Best weight: 76 grams less (139 vs 215).
- Have water resistant supports.
- Have wireless charging supports.
Why it is better not to take Sharp Aquos R2 Compact (disadvantages)
- Does not have infrared blaster supports.
The advantages of both models
- NFC supports.
- Have fast charging supports.
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro 6/128Gb related comparisons
- Compare Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro vs Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
- Compare Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro vs Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro
- Compare Oppo Reno 5 vs Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
- Compare Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro vs Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
- Compare Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Sharp Aquos R2 Compact related comparisons
- Compare AGM A8 vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact
- Compare Nomu M8 vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact
- Compare Nomu S50 Pro vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact
- Compare Sharp Aquos R3 vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact
- Compare Sharp AQUOS S2 vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact