Compare Sharp Aquos R3 vs OUKITEL C11
| Name | Sharp Aquos R3 | OUKITEL C11 |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Antutu benchmark | 365833 | 21166 |
| CPU | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 | MediaTek MT6580 |
| Diagonal size | 6.2 " | 5.45 " |
| Resolution | 3120x1440 | 960x480 |
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 2 |
| RAM | 6 Gb | 1 Gb |
| Bezel-less | Yes | Yes |
| ROM | 128 GB | 8 GB |
| External memory | MicroSD (TF), support of card up to 2Tb | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 64Gb |
| Rear camera | 12 Mp | 5 Mp |
| Camera | Dual Camera | Dual Camera |
| Sensor model | ||
| dxomark mobile ranking | ||
| dxomark (photo) | ||
| dxomark (video) | ||
| Front (selfie) camera | 16 Mp | 2 Mp |
| Battery | 3200 mAh | 3400 mAh |
| Wireless charging | Yes | No |
| Network | 4 G | 4 G |
| WiFi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS |
| Notifications Led | Yes | Yes |
| Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | No |
| Operating system (OS) | Android 9.0 | Android 8.1 |
| Material | Metal | Plastic |
| Weight | 185 g | 176 g |
| Dimensions | 156 x 74 x 8,9 mm | 146,6 x 70 x 10,3 mm |
| Price |
Notify me when it goes on sale.
View all Sharp models here
Alternatives to the Sharp Aquos R3: Sharp Aquos R2 Compact - Compare Sharp AQUOS S2 - Compare |
Discontinued.
View all OUKITEL models here
Alternatives to the OUKITEL C11: OUKITEL WP53 Pro - Compare OUKITEL WP8 Pro - Compare OUKITEL WP26 - Compare |
Sharp Aquos R3 vs OUKITEL C11: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Sharp Aquos R3’s camera vs OUKITEL C11’s camera, see the difference between the 12Mp sensor and the 5Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | Sharp Aquos R3 | OUKITEL C11 |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 12 Mp | 5 Mp |
| Sensor model | ||
| Flash | Dual LED flash | LED flash |
| Front (selfie) camera | 16 Mp | 2 Mp |
| Flash | No | No |
Sharp Aquos R3 vs OUKITEL C11: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Sharp Aquos R3 vs OUKITEL C11, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | Sharp Aquos R3 | OUKITEL C11 |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 3200 mAh | 3400 mAh |
| Type | Non-removable | Removable |
| Stand-by time | 5-6 days | 5-6 days |
| Battery Life | 2-3 days | 2-3 days |
| Working hours in hard mode | 6-7 hours | 6-7 hours |
| Talk time | 25 hours | 20 hours |
| Fast charging | Yes | No |
| Wireless charging | Yes | No |
Sharp Aquos R3 vs OUKITEL C11: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Sharp Aquos R3 in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 365833 score points which is 1628.40% faster than the OUKITEL C11, which got 21166. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Sharp Aquos R3 vs OUKITEL C11: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Sharp Aquos R3 in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 681 points score in "Single-core" of against the OUKITEL C11 which got 65, it is 947.69% faster. In "Multi-core" score 2663 vs 222 (1099.55% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Sharp Aquos R3 and OUKITEL C11? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Sharp Aquos R3 (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 1628.40% faster in the Antutu test (344667 score difference).
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 12Mp compared to 5Mp
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 16Mp vs 2Mp .
- NFC supports.
- Has a higher screen resolution: 3120x1440 vs 960x480.
- Have water resistant supports.
- Have wireless charging supports.
- Have fast charging supports.
Why it is better not to take Sharp Aquos R3 (disadvantages)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the OUKITEL C11 (advantages)
- Best weight: 9 grams less (176 vs 185).
- More battery capacity: 3400mAh vs 3200mAh (a difference of 200mAh).
Why it is better not to take OUKITEL C11 (disadvantages)
- Does not support NFC.
- Does not have water resistant supports.
- Does not have wireless charging support.
- Does not have fast charging support
The advantages of both models
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Sharp Aquos R3 related comparisons
- Compare Blackview BV9500 Pro vs Sharp Aquos R3
- Compare Blackview BV9600 Pro (Helio P60) vs Sharp Aquos R3
- Compare AGM X3 vs Sharp Aquos R3
- Compare Doogee S70 vs Sharp Aquos R3
- Compare Sharp Aquos R3 vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact
OUKITEL C11 related comparisons
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi 6A vs OUKITEL C11
- Compare OUKITEL C11 vs OUKITEL C12
- Compare HomTom HT16 vs OUKITEL C11
- Compare OUKITEL C8 vs OUKITEL C11
- Compare Leagoo M9 vs OUKITEL C11