Compare Sharp Aquos R3 vs Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
| Name | Sharp Aquos R3 | Samsung Galaxy A52 5G |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Antutu benchmark | 365833 | 326155 |
| CPU | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G |
| Diagonal size | 6.2 " | 6.5 " |
| Resolution | 3120x1440 | 2400x1080 |
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 10 |
| RAM | 6 Gb | 6 Gb |
| Bezel-less | Yes | Yes |
| ROM | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| External memory | MicroSD (TF), support of card up to 2Tb | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb |
| Rear camera | 12 Mp | 64 Mp |
| Camera | Dual Camera | Four cameras |
| Sensor model | Sony IMX682 | |
| dxomark mobile ranking | ||
| dxomark (photo) | ||
| dxomark (video) | ||
| Front (selfie) camera | 16 Mp | 32 Mp |
| Battery | 3200 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Wireless charging | Yes | No |
| Network | 4 G | 5 G |
| WiFi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS |
| Notifications Led | Yes | No |
| Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | Yes |
| Operating system (OS) | Android 9.0 | Android 10.0 (Q) |
| Material | Metal | Metal frame and plastic case |
| Weight | 185 g | 187 g |
| Dimensions | 156 x 74 x 8,9 mm | 159,9 x 75,1 x 8,4 mm |
| Price |
Notify me when it goes on sale.
View all Sharp models here
Alternatives to the Sharp Aquos R3: Sharp Aquos R2 Compact - Compare Sharp AQUOS S2 - Compare |
Notify me when it goes on sale.
View all Samsung models here
Alternatives to the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G: Samsung Galaxy A10s - Compare Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 - Compare Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus 8/128Gb - Compare |
Sharp Aquos R3 vs Samsung Galaxy A52 5G: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Sharp Aquos R3’s camera vs Samsung Galaxy A52 5G’s camera, see the difference between the 12Mp sensor and the 64Mp Sony IMX682 sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | Sharp Aquos R3 | Samsung Galaxy A52 5G |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 12 Mp | 64 Mp |
| Sensor model | Sony IMX682 | |
| Flash | Dual LED flash | Dual LED flash |
| Front (selfie) camera | 16 Mp | 32 Mp |
| Flash | No | No |
Sharp Aquos R3 vs Samsung Galaxy A52 5G: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Sharp Aquos R3 vs Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | Sharp Aquos R3 | Samsung Galaxy A52 5G |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 3200 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Type | Non-removable | Non-removable |
| Stand-by time | 5-6 days | 6-7 days |
| Battery Life | 2-3 days | 3-4 days |
| Working hours in hard mode | 6-7 hours | 10-12 hours |
| Talk time | 25 hours | 30 hours |
| Fast charging | Yes | Yes |
| Wireless charging | Yes | No |
Sharp Aquos R3 vs Samsung Galaxy A52 5G: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Sharp Aquos R3 in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 365833 score points which is 12.17% faster than the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, which got 326155. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Sharp Aquos R3 vs Samsung Galaxy A52 5G: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Sharp Aquos R3 in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 681 points score in "Single-core" of against the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G which got 613, it is 11.09% faster. In "Multi-core" score 2663 vs 1916 (38.99% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Sharp Aquos R3 and Samsung Galaxy A52 5G? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Sharp Aquos R3 (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 12.17% faster in the Antutu test (39678 score difference).
- Best weight: 2 grams less (185 vs 187).
- Has a higher screen resolution: 3120x1440 vs 2400x1080.
- Have wireless charging supports.
Why it is better not to take Sharp Aquos R3 (disadvantages)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G (advantages)
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 64Mp Sony IMX682 compared to 12Mp
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 32Mp Samsung S5KGD1 vs 16Mp .
- More battery capacity: 5000mAh vs 3200mAh (a difference of 1800mAh).
Why it is better not to take Samsung Galaxy A52 5G (disadvantages)
- Does not have wireless charging support.
The advantages of both models
- NFC supports.
- Have water resistant supports.
- Have fast charging supports.
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Sharp Aquos R3 related comparisons
- Compare Blackview BV9500 Pro vs Sharp Aquos R3
- Compare Blackview BV9600 Pro (Helio P60) vs Sharp Aquos R3
- Compare AGM X3 vs Sharp Aquos R3
- Compare Doogee S70 vs Sharp Aquos R3
- Compare Sharp Aquos R3 vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G related comparisons
- Compare Samsung Galaxy A52s vs Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
- Compare Samsung Galaxy A32 5G vs Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
- Compare Samsung Galaxy S20 FE vs Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
- Compare Samsung Galaxy A71 vs Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
- Compare Samsung Galaxy A53 5G vs Samsung Galaxy A52 5G