Compare Vernee Thor 3/16Gb vs UHAPPY UP350
| Name | Vernee Thor 3/16Gb | UHAPPY UP350 |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Antutu benchmark | 37524 | |
| CPU | MediaTek MT6753 | MediaTek MT6737 |
| Diagonal size | 5 " | 5.5 " |
| Resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 5 | 5 |
| RAM | 3 Gb | 2 Gb |
| Bezel-less | No | No |
| ROM | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| External memory | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 128Gb | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 64Gb |
| Rear camera | 13 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Camera | Single camera | Single camera |
| Sensor model | ||
| dxomark mobile ranking | ||
| dxomark (photo) | ||
| dxomark (video) | ||
| Front (selfie) camera | 5 Mp | 5 Mp |
| Battery | 2800 mAh | 2700 mAh |
| Wireless charging | ||
| Network | 4 G | 4 G |
| WiFi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | |
| NFC | No | |
| Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS |
| Notifications Led | Yes | Yes |
| Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | Yes |
| Operating system (OS) | Android 6.0 | Android 6.0 |
| Material | Metal and plastic | Metal frame and plastic case |
| Weight | 140 g | 135 g |
| Dimensions | 142 x 70.3 x 7.9 mm | 152 x 76,6 x 8,8 mm |
| Price |
Discontinued.
View all Vernee models here
Alternatives to the Vernee Thor 3/16Gb: |
Notify me when it goes on sale.
View all UHAPPY models here
Alternatives to the UHAPPY UP350: |
Vernee Thor 3/16Gb vs UHAPPY UP350: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Vernee Thor’s camera vs UHAPPY UP350’s camera, see the difference between the 13Mp sensor and the 8Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | Vernee Thor 3/16Gb | UHAPPY UP350 |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 13 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Sensor model | ||
| Flash | LED flash | |
| Front (selfie) camera | 5 Mp | 5 Mp |
| Flash | No |
Vernee Thor 3/16Gb vs UHAPPY UP350: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Vernee Thor vs UHAPPY UP350, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | Vernee Thor 3/16Gb | UHAPPY UP350 |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 2800 mAh | 2700 mAh |
| Type | Non-removable | Removable |
| Stand-by time | 5-6 days | |
| Battery Life | 2-3 days | |
| Working hours in hard mode | 5-6 hours | |
| Talk time | 20 hours | |
| Fast charging | Yes | |
| Wireless charging |
Vernee Thor 3/16Gb vs UHAPPY UP350: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Vernee Thor 3/16Gb in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 37524 score points which is 100.00% faster than the UHAPPY UP350, which got 0. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Vernee Thor 3/16Gb vs UHAPPY UP350: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Vernee Thor 3/16Gb in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 116 points score in "Single-core" of against the UHAPPY UP350 which got 126, it is -7.94% faster. In "Multi-core" score 604 vs 433 (39.49% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Vernee Thor 3/16Gb and UHAPPY UP350? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Vernee Thor 3/16Gb (advantages)
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 13Mp compared to 8Mp
- More battery capacity: 2800mAh vs 2700mAh (a difference of 100mAh).
- Have fast charging supports.
Why it is better not to take Vernee Thor 3/16Gb (disadvantages)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the UHAPPY UP350 (advantages)
- Best weight: 5 grams less (135 vs 140).
Why it is better not to take UHAPPY UP350 (disadvantages)
- Does not have fast charging support
The advantages of both models
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Vernee Thor 3/16Gb related comparisons
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi 4X vs Vernee Thor
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi 4X Pro vs Vernee Thor
- Compare OUKITEL U20 Plus vs Vernee Thor
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi 4A vs Vernee Thor
- Compare Vernee Thor vs Doogee X5 Max Pro