0
Compare:
Compare with:
Please enter model name or part of it
 
AED درهم BHD دب BRL R$ CNY ¥ CZK Kč DKK kr EUR € GBP £ IDR Rp ILS ₪ INR ₹ JPY ¥ KRW ₩ KWD د.ك NOK kr PLN zł QAR ريال RUB руб SAR درهم SEK kr TRY ₺ UAH грн
You were probably searching for:
Reviews

Compare UMI Touch 3/16Gb vs Cubot Dinosaur 3/16Gb

UMI Touch 3/16Gb vs Cubot Dinosaur 3/16Gb Comparison - Compare Size, Cameras, Specs, Features, Price of UMI Touch 3/16Gb with Cubot Dinosaur 3/16Gb.

Name UMI Touch 3/16Gb Cubot Dinosaur 3/16Gb
UMI Touch 3/16Gb Cubot Dinosaur 3/16Gb
Antutu benchmark 34598 33539
CPU MediaTek MT6753 MediaTek MT6735
Diagonal size 5.5 " 5.5 "
Resolution 1920x1080 1280x720
Multi-touch (number of touches) 5 5
RAM 3 Gb 3 Gb
Bezel-less No No
ROM 16 GB 16 GB
External memory MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 128Gb MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 32Gb
Rear camera 13 Mp 13 Mp
Camera Single camera Single camera
Sensor model Sony IMX328
dxomark mobile ranking
dxomark (photo)
dxomark (video)
Front (selfie) camera 5 Mp 5 Mp
Battery 3800 mAh 4150 mAh
Wireless charging
Network 4 G 4 G
WiFi Yes Yes
Bluetooth Yes Yes
NFC No No
Navigation (Positioning) GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS
Notifications Led Yes Yes
Fingerprint's scanner Yes No
Operating system (OS) Android 6.0 Android 6.0
Material Metal Plastic
Weight 190 g 185 g
Dimensions 154.5 x 76 x 8.5 mm 152.3 x 77.2 x 8.8 mm
  Price Discontinued. View all UMI models here
Alternatives to the UMI Touch 3/16Gb:
Discontinued. View all Cubot models here
Alternatives to the Cubot Dinosaur 3/16Gb:
Cubot X30 8/128Gb - Compare
Cubot King Kong - Compare
Cubot King Kong 7 8/256GB - Compare

UMI Touch 3/16Gb vs Cubot Dinosaur 3/16Gb: Camera comparison.

In this table, you can compare the UMI Touch’s camera vs Cubot Dinosaur’s camera, see the difference between the 13Mp Sony IMX328 sensor and the 13Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.

Name UMI Touch 3/16Gb Cubot Dinosaur 3/16Gb
Rear camera 13 Mp 13 Mp
Sensor model Sony IMX328
Flash Dual LED flash LED flash
Front (selfie) camera 5 Mp 5 Mp
Flash LED flash No

UMI Touch 3/16Gb vs Cubot Dinosaur 3/16Gb: battery life comparison.

Below, you can find the last battery life test between the UMI Touch vs Cubot Dinosaur, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.

Name UMI Touch 3/16Gb Cubot Dinosaur 3/16Gb
Battery 3800 mAh 4150 mAh
Type Non-removable Removable
Stand-by time 6-7 days 5-6 days
Battery Life 2-3 days 2-3 days
Working hours in hard mode 7-8 hours 7-8 hours
Talk time 30 hours 30 hours
Fast charging No Yes
Wireless charging

UMI Touch 3/16Gb vs Cubot Dinosaur 3/16Gb: Antutu benchmark comparison. UMI Touch 3/16Gb vs Cubot Dinosaur 3/16Gb: Antutu benchmark comparison.

UMI Touch 3/16Gb in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 34598 score points which is 3.16% faster than the Cubot Dinosaur 3/16Gb, which got 33539. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.

UMI Touch 3/16Gb
5.5" (1920x1080) Curved Glass / MT6753 / 3Gb / 16GB / 13Mp Sony IMX328 / 3800mAh
0.00€
$0.00
 
Cubot Dinosaur 3/16Gb
5.5" (1280x720) Curved Glass / MT6735 / 3Gb / 16GB / 13Mp / 4150mAh
90.42€
$96.91
 

UMI Touch 3/16Gb vs Cubot Dinosaur 3/16Gb: Geekbench benchmark comparison.

UMI Touch 3/16Gb in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 0 points score in "Single-core" of against the Cubot Dinosaur 3/16Gb which got 0, it is 100.00% faster. In "Multi-core" score 0 vs 0 (100.00% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.

UMI Touch 3/16Gb
5.5" (1920x1080) Curved Glass / MT6753 / 3Gb / 16GB / 13Mp Sony IMX328 / 3800mAh
0.00€
$0.00
 
Cubot Dinosaur 3/16Gb
5.5" (1280x720) Curved Glass / MT6735 / 3Gb / 16GB / 13Mp / 4150mAh
90.42€
$96.91
 

What is the difference between UMI Touch 3/16Gb and Cubot Dinosaur 3/16Gb? (compare specs) (which is better)

The main differences, why it is better to choose the UMI Touch 3/16Gb (advantages)

  • Good performance: Is 3.16% faster in the Antutu test (1059 score difference).
  • Has a higher screen resolution: 1920x1080 vs 1280x720.

Why it is better not to take UMI Touch 3/16Gb (disadvantages)

  • Does not have fast charging support

The main differences, why it is better to choose the Cubot Dinosaur 3/16Gb (advantages)

  • Best weight: 5 grams less (185 vs 190).
  • More battery capacity: 4150mAh vs 3800mAh (a difference of 350mAh).
  • Have fast charging supports.

Why it is better not to take Cubot Dinosaur 3/16Gb (disadvantages)

The advantages of both models

  • Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.

UMI Touch 3/16Gb related comparisons

Cubot Dinosaur 3/16Gb related comparisons

Rate this page: 1-5
4.72/5 of 130
Frequent comparisons