Compare UMIDIGI A13 Pro 5G vs Cubot P80

UMIDIGI A13 Pro 5G vs Cubot P80 Comparison - Compare Size, Cameras, Specs, Features, Price of UMIDIGI A13 Pro 5G with Cubot P80.
Name	UMIDIGI A13 Pro 5G	Cubot P80

Antutu benchmark	362522	199835
CPU	MediaTek Dimensity 700	MediaTek Helio P60
Diagonal size	6.5 "	6.58 "
Resolution	2400x1080	2408x1080
Multi-touch (number of touches)	10	10
RAM	8 Gb	8 Gb
Bezel-less	Yes	Yes
ROM	128 GB	256 GB
External memory	MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb	MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb
Rear camera	48 Mp	48 Mp
Camera	Triple Camera	Triple Camera
Sensor model	Sony IMX582
dxomark mobile ranking
dxomark (photo)
dxomark (video)
Front (selfie) camera	24 Mp	24 Mp
Battery	5150 mAh	5200 mAh
Wireless charging	No	No
Network	4 G	4 G
WiFi	Yes	Yes
Bluetooth	Yes	Yes
NFC	Yes	Yes
Navigation (Positioning)	GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS	GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS
Notifications Led	No	Yes
Fingerprint's scanner	Yes	Yes
Operating system (OS)	Android 12	Android 13
Material	Plastic	Plastic
Weight	200 g	g
Dimensions	162,2 x 75,88 x 9,9 mm	mm
Price	126.16€ ($145.71) See Details	Notify me when it goes on sale. View all Cubot models here Alternatives to the Cubot P80: Cubot King Kong 6 - Compare Cubot Pocket - Compare Cubot S200 - Compare

UMIDIGI A13 Pro 5G vs Cubot P80: Camera comparison.

In this table, you can compare the UMIDIGI A13 Pro 5G’s camera vs Cubot P80’s camera, see the difference between the 48Mp Sony IMX582 sensor and the 48Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.

Name	UMIDIGI A13 Pro 5G	Cubot P80
Rear camera	48 Mp	48 Mp
Sensor model	Sony IMX582
Flash	Dual LED flash	LED flash
Front (selfie) camera	24 Mp	24 Mp
Flash	No	No

UMIDIGI A13 Pro 5G vs Cubot P80: battery life comparison.

Below, you can find the last battery life test between the UMIDIGI A13 Pro 5G vs Cubot P80, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.

Name	UMIDIGI A13 Pro 5G	Cubot P80
Battery	5150 mAh	5200 mAh
Type	Non-removable	Non-removable
Stand-by time	6-7 days	6-7 days
Battery Life	2-3 days	3-4 days
Working hours in hard mode	10-12 hours	10-12 hours
Talk time	30 hours	30 hours
Fast charging	Yes	No
Wireless charging	No	No

UMIDIGI A13 Pro 5G vs Cubot P80: Antutu benchmark comparison.

UMIDIGI A13 Pro 5G in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 362522 score points which is 81.41% faster than the Cubot P80, which got 199835. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.

UMIDIGI A13 Pro 5G

6.5 inches (2400x1080) Curved Glass / Dimensity 700 / 8Gb / 128GB / 48Mp Sony IMX582 / 5150mAh

126.16€

$145.71

362522

Cubot P80

On Sale Soon

199835

UMIDIGI A13 Pro 5G vs Cubot P80: Geekbench benchmark comparison.

UMIDIGI A13 Pro 5G in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 604 points score in "Single-core" of against the Cubot P80 which got 328, it is 84.15% faster. In "Multi-core" score 1828 vs 1485 (23.10% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.

UMIDIGI A13 Pro 5G

6.5 inches (2400x1080) Curved Glass / Dimensity 700 / 8Gb / 128GB / 48Mp Sony IMX582 / 5150mAh

126.16€

$145.71

604 / 1828

Cubot P80

On Sale Soon

328 / 1485

What is the difference between UMIDIGI A13 Pro 5G and Cubot P80? (compare specs) (which is better)

The main differences, why it is better to choose the UMIDIGI A13 Pro 5G (advantages)

Good performance: Is 81.41% faster in the Antutu test (162687 score difference).
Have fast charging supports.

Why it is better not to take UMIDIGI A13 Pro 5G (disadvantages)

The main differences, why it is better to choose the Cubot P80 (advantages)

Has a higher screen resolution: 2408x1080 vs 2400x1080.
More battery capacity: 5200mAh vs 5150mAh (a difference of 50mAh).

Why it is better not to take Cubot P80 (disadvantages)

Does not have fast charging support

The advantages of both models

NFC supports.
Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.

UMIDIGI A13 Pro 5G related comparisons

Cubot P80 related comparisons

Rate this page: 1-5

4.50/5 of 2

Frequent comparisons