0
Compare:
Compare with:
Please enter model name or part of it
 
AED درهم BHD دب BRL R$ CNY ¥ CZK Kč DKK kr EUR € GBP £ IDR Rp ILS ₪ INR ₹ JPY ¥ KRW ₩ KWD د.ك NOK kr PLN zł QAR ريال RUB руб SAR SAR SEK kr TRY ₺ UAH грн
You were probably searching for:
Reviews

Compare Vivo IQOO Neo 5 8/256GB vs UMIDIGI A3 Pro

Vivo IQOO Neo 5 8/256GB vs UMIDIGI A3 Pro Comparison - Compare Size, Cameras, Specs, Features, Price of Vivo IQOO Neo 5 8/256GB with UMIDIGI A3 Pro.

Name Vivo IQOO Neo 5 8/256GB UMIDIGI A3 Pro
Vivo IQOO Neo 5 8/256GB UMIDIGI A3 Pro
Antutu benchmark 653288 33566
CPU Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 MediaTek MT6739
Diagonal size 6.62 " 5.7 "
Resolution 2400x1080 1512x720
Multi-touch (number of touches) 10 5
RAM 8 Gb 3 Gb
Bezel-less Yes Yes
ROM 256 GB 32 GB
External memory No MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 64Gb
Rear camera 48 Mp 12 Mp
Camera Triple Camera Dual Camera
Sensor model Sony IMX598
dxomark mobile ranking
dxomark (photo)
dxomark (video)
Front (selfie) camera 16 Mp 8 Mp
Battery 4400 mAh 3300 mAh
Wireless charging No No
Network 5 G 4 G
WiFi Yes Yes
Bluetooth Yes Yes
NFC Yes No
Navigation (Positioning) GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS GPS, A-GPS
Notifications Led No Yes
Fingerprint's scanner Yes Yes
Operating system (OS) Android 11 Android 8.1
Material Metal frame and glass case Metal frame and glass case
Weight 196 g 187 g
Dimensions 163,3 x 76,4 x 8,4 mm 147,2 x 70,2 x 8,5 mm
  Price 392.79€ ($414.25) See Details 139.15€ ($146.75) See Details

Vivo IQOO Neo 5 8/256GB vs UMIDIGI A3 Pro: Camera comparison.

In this table, you can compare the Vivo IQOO Neo 5’s camera vs UMIDIGI A3 Pro’s camera, see the difference between the 48Mp Sony IMX598 sensor and the 12Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.

Name Vivo IQOO Neo 5 8/256GB UMIDIGI A3 Pro
Rear camera 48 Mp 12 Mp
Sensor model Sony IMX598
Flash Dual LED flash LED flash
Front (selfie) camera 16 Mp 8 Mp
Flash No No

Vivo IQOO Neo 5 8/256GB vs UMIDIGI A3 Pro: battery life comparison.

Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Vivo IQOO Neo 5 vs UMIDIGI A3 Pro, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.

Name Vivo IQOO Neo 5 8/256GB UMIDIGI A3 Pro
Battery 4400 mAh 3300 mAh
Type Non-removable Non-removable
Stand-by time 6-7 days 5-6 days
Battery Life 3-4 days 2-3 days
Working hours in hard mode 8-9 hours 6-7 hours
Talk time 30 hours 25 hours
Fast charging Yes No
Wireless charging No No

Vivo IQOO Neo 5 8/256GB vs UMIDIGI A3 Pro: Antutu benchmark comparison. Vivo IQOO Neo 5 8/256GB vs UMIDIGI A3 Pro: Antutu benchmark comparison.

Vivo IQOO Neo 5 8/256GB in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 653288 score points which is 1846.28% faster than the UMIDIGI A3 Pro, which got 33566. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.

Vivo IQOO Neo 5 8/256GB
6.62 inches (2400x1080) Gorilla glass / Snapdragon 870 / 8Gb / 256GB / 48Mp Sony IMX598 / 4400mAh
392.79€
$414.25
 
UMIDIGI A3 Pro
5.7" (1512x720) Curved Glass / MT6739 / 3Gb / 32GB / 12Mp / 3300mAh
139.15€
$146.75
 

Vivo IQOO Neo 5 8/256GB vs UMIDIGI A3 Pro: Geekbench benchmark comparison.

Vivo IQOO Neo 5 8/256GB in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 923 points score in "Single-core" of against the UMIDIGI A3 Pro which got 150, it is 515.33% faster. In "Multi-core" score 3228 vs 370 (772.43% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.

Vivo IQOO Neo 5 8/256GB
6.62 inches (2400x1080) Gorilla glass / Snapdragon 870 / 8Gb / 256GB / 48Mp Sony IMX598 / 4400mAh
392.79€
$414.25
 
UMIDIGI A3 Pro
5.7" (1512x720) Curved Glass / MT6739 / 3Gb / 32GB / 12Mp / 3300mAh
139.15€
$146.75
 

What is the difference between Vivo IQOO Neo 5 8/256GB and UMIDIGI A3 Pro? (compare specs) (which is better)

The main differences, why it is better to choose the Vivo IQOO Neo 5 8/256GB (advantages)

  • Good performance: Is 1846.28% faster in the Antutu test (619722 score difference).
  • Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 48Mp Sony IMX598 compared to 12Mp
  • Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 16Mp vs 8Mp OmniVision OV8856.
  • NFC supports.
  • Has a higher screen resolution: 2400x1080 vs 1512x720.
  • More battery capacity: 4400mAh vs 3300mAh (a difference of 1100mAh).
  • Have fast charging supports.

Why it is better not to take Vivo IQOO Neo 5 8/256GB (disadvantages)

  • Does not have Headphone Jack. Need audio 3.5mm headphone jack adapter

The main differences, why it is better to choose the UMIDIGI A3 Pro (advantages)

  • Best weight: 9 grams less (187 vs 196).
  • Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.

Why it is better not to take UMIDIGI A3 Pro (disadvantages)

  • Does not support NFC.
  • Does not have fast charging support

The advantages of both models

Vivo IQOO Neo 5 8/256GB related comparisons

UMIDIGI A3 Pro related comparisons

Rate this page: 1-5
4.00/5 of 4
Frequent comparisons